Super Smash Bros. for 3DS & Wii U Thread 7: How Can My Smash Brother Be This Cut

Hmm, so, does anyone think they'll include anything from Pokemon ORAS in the game? I'm not talking about Hoenn representatives but more like an trophy reference or something. Probably both Groudon and Kyogre will return and we haven't seen them yet, so it would be cool to include their supposedly mega forms.
 
bqAHbwA.gif


I'm really sorry about low quality of my work.
tumblr_n5qakgYIpB1twgs7qo1_500.gif
 
Hmm, so, does anyone think they'll include anything from Pokemon ORAS in the game? I'm not talking about Hoenn representatives but more like an trophy reference or something. Probably both Groudon and Kyogre will return and we haven't seen them yet, so it would be cool to include their supposedly mega forms.

Kyogre were shown in Smash Direct.
 
Speaking of OR/AS, when do you all suppose those games entered development? I really have no idea how long the remakes take to develop, nor do I have any understanding of the team structure at Game Freak. If GF told Sakurai about those games around the same time they suggested Greninja, then I'm sure it's possible we'll see new gen 3 representation.
 
Speaking of OR/AS, when do you all suppose those games entered development? I really have no idea how long the remakes take to develop, nor do I have any understanding of the team structure at Game Freak. If GF told Sakurai about those games around the same time they suggested Greninja, then I'm sure it's possible we'll see new gen 3 representation.
Eh, I don't really think so. The remakes aren't really the same as a whole new game in terms of representation.
 
Speaking of OR/AS, when do you all suppose those games entered development? I really have no idea how long the remakes take to develop, nor do I have any understanding of the team structure at Game Freak. If GF told Sakurai about those games around the same time they suggested Greninja, then I'm sure it's possible we'll see new gen 3 representation.

GameFreak's historically been a two-team studio, with main games developed by one and remakes/third versions developed by the second.

It's entirely possible that the two were in development concurrently, or at least planned out in advance.
 
Speaking of OR/AS, when do you all suppose those games entered development? I really have no idea how long the remakes take to develop, nor do I have any understanding of the team structure at Game Freak. If GF told Sakurai about those games around the same time they suggested Greninja, then I'm sure it's possible we'll see new gen 3 representation.

I'm quite confident Sakurai has been aware of this game's development. He should probably know everything Nintendo has planned, considering the type of game Smash is.

A playable Gen 3 starter would be neat. Sceptile would definitely fulfill the need for a leaf starter. Though Blaziken is more popular, and "looks cooler", despite being super redundant.

Eh, I don't really think so. The remakes aren't really the same as a whole new game in terms of representation.

I believe Pokemon Trainer was relevant to Fire Red and Leaf Green, not to mention this remake will be a full overhaul with 3D models and more.
 
I'm quite confident Sakurai has been aware of this game's development. He should probably know everything Nintendo has planned, considering the type of game Smash is.

A playable Gen 3 starter would be neat. Sceptile would definitely fulfill the need for a leaf starter. Though Blaziken is more popular, and "looks cooler", despite being super redundant.

Despite that, TPCi is known for their secrecy. I'm pretty sure that not everyone knew about stuff like Greninja long before his official reveal. Actually, I'm confident they chose him as the XY rep after the game's release.
 
I'm quite confident Sakurai has been aware of this game's development. He should probably know everything Nintendo has planned, considering the type of game Smash is.

A playable Gen 3 starter would be neat. Sceptile would definitely fulfill the need for a leaf starter. Though Blaziken is more popular, and "looks cooler", despite being super redundant.



I believe Pokemon Trainer was relevant to Fire Red and Leaf Green, not to mention this remake will be a full overhaul with 3D models and more.
So wouldn't FR/LG have been our 3rd gen rep then? Shouldn't we get a HGSS character by that logic?
 
Speaking of OR/AS, when do you all suppose those games entered development? I really have no idea how long the remakes take to develop, nor do I have any understanding of the team structure at Game Freak. If GF told Sakurai about those games around the same time they suggested Greninja, then I'm sure it's possible we'll see new gen 3 representation.
GF has a two team system. So when team #1 release B/W in 2010 they began on X/Y which released in 2013. Then when Black 2/White 2 released they likely began on ORAS in 2012.
 
So wouldn't FR/LG have been our 3rd gen rep then? Shouldn't we get a HGSS character by that logic?

Uh. ..

You're over analyzing my comment. There's no hard rule or number that series representation should abide by. I'm just saying that there's no "disqualifier" for remakes, nor should there be.
 
Uh. ..

You're over analyzing my comment. There's no hard rule or number that series representation should abide by. I'm just saying that there's no "disqualifier" for remakes.
Yeah, but there's nothing to really suggest that a recent remake means more content will show up either, which was my point.

Compare to a brand new gen, which always results in a new character.
 
Yeah, but there's nothing to really suggest that a recent remake means more content will show up either, which was my point.

Compare to a brand new gen, which always results in a new character.

Yeah, we're just discussing the possibility. It's not like it's a far-fetched idea. (Held back from bad Pokemon pun).
 
It seems Zoroark will appear as a Pokeball Pokemon. And it makes much more sense that way.
GF has a two team system. So when team #1 release B/W in 2010 they began on X/Y which released in 2013. Then when Black 2/White 2 released they likely began on ORAS in 2012.
Should be noted that Team #2 works on remakes and third versions. 3rd versions require less work so I believe that only a bit of time is required for the 3rd version while remakes would require a lot more work.
 
2D Mario Bosses: A history.

SMB1: Fake Bowsers + Bowser
SMB2: Fake Bowsers + Bowser
SMB3: Koopalings + Bowser (Boom Boom)
SMW: Koopalings + Bowser (Reznor, Big Boo)
NSMB: Bowser + Mummipokey, Cheepskipper, Mega Goomba, Petey Piranha, Monty Tank, Lakithunder, and Dry Bowser (Bowser Jr)
NSMBWii: Koopalings + Bowser + Bowser Jr (Kamek)
NSMB2: Koopalings + Bowser + Dry Bowser (Reznor)
NSMBU: Koopalings + Bowser + Bowser Jr (Boom Boom, Boss Sumo Bro, Kamek)

It should be noted that the Koopalings, Bowser Jr, and Bowser change up their tactics a lot between games.

Seems like NSMB's diversive bosses put a false image in my head then. I didn't mind them in SMW, but that had been my first and only 2D Mario game at the time I played it.
Oh well it's not like the bosses have ever been my primary source of enjoyment in the 2D Mario games, at least they are exploitable enough to quickly finish them off and move on. Still hope we'll get another 2D Mario game with bosses in the vein of NSMB (but with NSMBU-quality level design)
 
Nonexistent right? About the same as Skull Kid, Ashley, and Wonder Red.

I don't think that many actually care about skill kid. Majora mask is the ff9 of Zeldas. ( ff9 is one of my favorite ff's)

And no one knows who wonder red is.

Wario ware isn't popular enough yet.


Deoxis is already more popular than these three.
 
There's been a lot of talk of King K. Rool lately, and it's got me thinking of bad guys in Smash Bros. I say "bad guys" instead of villains because not all of the characters who are portrayed as bad guys in Smash Bros. are necessarily villains; they can be rivals or anti-heroes, too. Anyway, I think this is an interesting subject to look into, so let's talk about bad guys in the Smash Bros. series.

In the original Super Smash Bros., there were no bad guys. Four were planned, however, but didn't make the cut: Bowser, Mewtwo, King Dedede, and Wolf.

Super Smash Bros. Melee introduced three bad guys: Bowser, Mewtwo, and Ganondorf. These three characters are even featured together in Event Match 51: The Showdown. King Dedede was also planned for Melee, but was cut in favor of six clone characters (including Ganondorf).

In Super Smash Bros. Brawl, we got three more bad guys: King Dedede, Wolf, and Wario. (You could say that Meta Knight arguably counts too, but he wasn't really portrayed as a bad guy in the game like King Dedede and Wario were.) Unfortunately, we also lost one (Mewtwo; though he was planned to be in the game at one point).

So, the last two Smash Bros. games have each introduced three bad guys. Smash Bros. is made up of a large majority of hero and sidekick characters, but very few bad guys. Because of this, and because of the fact that three bad guys have been added in the last two games, I think it's a safe bet that Sakurai will add some more this time around, too. Smash Bros. needs more bad guys, after all!

But who will those bad guys be? I think it's very unlikely for any franchise that's new to Smash Bros. this time around to get a bad guy, because I don't think we'll see more than one character per new franchise, and there's no way they'd choose a bad guy over a main character (unless the main character of the franchise is a bad guy, like in Wario's case, but there aren't really many other examples of that to choose from).

With that in mind, I think it's safe to say that we should only expect bad guys from franchises that have already been represented with a character in Smash Bros. in past games. From those, subtract any franchises that already have bad guys in Smash Bros. (Mario, The Legend of Zelda, Kirby, Star Fox, and Pokémon if you include Mewtwo), because I doubt any franchise will be getting more than one. On top of that, remove any franchises that don't really have any bad guys that could be playable characters in Smash Bros. (Yoshi—because Kamek/Magikoopa is already a Smash Run enemy, Ice Climber, Game & Watch, Pikmin, Robot Series). Also, I doubt third-party franchises will be getting a second character, so you can exclude those, too. That leaves us with the following franchises, with the respective potential bad guys:

Donkey Kong: King K. Rool
Metroid: Ridley
F-ZERO: Black Shadow
EarthBound/MOTHER: Masked Man
Fire Emblem: Black Knight
Wario: Captain Syrup
Kid Icarus: Medusa or Hades

Of course, there may be other potential bad guys for some of those franchises, but I believe the ones listed are the most popular and would be the most likely. Of those, some have pretty much no chance. I doubt we'll get another F-ZERO or EarthBound/MOTHER character. And for the Wario franchise, if we ever do get another character, it'd probably be from WarioWare, not Wario Land; besides, Wario's already a bad guy, so I think another one from his series would be unlikely and unnecessary, even if it's his bad guy. When it comes to Fire Emblem, I doubt they'd add a bad guy over a main character, especially when the series has so many to choose from. For Kid Icarus, I expect Palutena before any other character, and I feel like a third Kid Icarus character is unlikely (though still more likely than bad guys from any of the franchises mentioned above).

That leaves us with only two franchises that I really feel have a good shot at getting a bad guy this time around: Donkey Kong and Metroid. And those two characters would be King K. Rool and Ridley.

Given all this, I don't think King K. Rool or Ridley are as far-fetched as many people make them seem. If we are to get any more bad guys in Smash Bros., these two kind of have priority over everyone else.

So...yeah. What do you all think? Do you really think that we won't get any more bad guys this time around? And if we do and it's not King K. Rool or Ridley, who would it be?!

Also, apologies for saying "bad guys" so much. I know how silly it sounds, but I couldn't think of a better term, lol.

EDIT: Of course, there has to be an interesting pic of the day when I try to start a new discussion. ._. XD It's about time they revealed female Villager and alternate outfits for the character. We all knew it was coming, anyway!

Bumping this discussion for weekend SmashGAF. =P I'm really interested in hearing what people think about potential bad guy newcomers. Will we get any more this time? If so, who?
 
Seems like NSMB's diversive bosses put a false image in my head then. I didn't mind them in SMW, but that had been my first and only 2D Mario game at the time I played it.
Oh well it's not like the bosses have ever been my primary source of enjoyment in the 2D Mario games, at least they are exploitable enough to quickly finish them off and move on. Still hope we'll get another 2D Mario game with bosses in the vein of NSMB (but with NSMBU-quality level design)

The Koopalings have been as diverse as those bosses from NSMB, they just really need to make it impossible to hit them before they start another attack phase. The only real problem with them is you can hit them as soon as they pop out of their shells.
 
Bumping this discussion for weekend SmashGAF. =P I'm really interested in hearing what people think about potential bad guy newcomers. Will we get any more this time? If so, who?

I chose King Boo in a previous post:

Striking off Ridley and K. Rool, any Nintendo villains you guys want that aren't often talked about here?

I personally want King Boo from Luigi's Mansion in.

216px-LuigiMansion2-LuigivsKingBoo.png


I want him in because he'll be difficult to implement properly, which always leads to some creativity.

I sat down and thought about it for a good ~10 mins and came up with things that he could potentially do.

Firstly, for his idle, he'd float in place, a few inches off the ground, and when he "runs" or dashes, he has his hands out in front while shaking his head left and right as if he's trying to scare/haunt something.

His "jump" could possibly be Kirby-esque, though I think we're getting too many of those character types. Perhaps it should be limited to three "jumps" before he covers his eyes and falls to his doom or something.

For his B-specials:

Up-B could probably be similar to Dedede where he flies up into the air and drop back down with a shockwave, like he does in the boss battle for Luigi's Mansion 2.

Down-B could probably be several things. He could have a charge move where he builds up electricity in his crown and let it explode as an AoE. He could also summon a portrait frame in front of him that could trap an opponent in a portrait for a few seconds, allowing him to hit them.

Side-B he could probably throw a spiked ball that has physics so that it would roll down hills and sloping platforms. He could also maybe summon a purple ghost that could fly forward and punch an opponent.

For his normals, he'd probably have a neutral A similar to Kirby's with a bunch of jabs with his stubby arms. His forward A could be a tumbling/rolling attack like he does in the boss battle, and his down A could be a chomp type attack.

For his Final Smash, he could summon a bunch of boos that beeline towards the opponents and possess them. The opponents still have control, but every 1~3 seconds, the player can give them a "command" by pressing direction+A, direction+B, or direction+jump, forcing them to execute those commands.

I haven't really thought up anything else for him in depth, but I felt the need to dump my brain somewhere.
 
The Koopalings have been as diverse as those bosses from NSMB, they just really need to make it impossible to hit them before they start another attack phase. The only real problem with them is you can hit them as soon as they pop out of their shells.

For someone who doesn't like them in the slightest (like me) it's more like the single redeeming quality they have.

Honest players still can choose not to abuse this. I hope Nintendo won't remove the possibility to "skip" these guys in future titles.
 
I chose King Boo in a previous post:
So this is a personal want, not a character that you expect? If that's the case, what bad guy newcomers do you expect to see, if any?

I think King Boo would be cool (though I think the lack of feet would be a real issue...), but I don't expect to see him at all. Plus, we've already got Bowser (and Wario, kinda) for a Mario series villain. But King Boo is cool. It's lame that he's not even in Mario Kart anymore. =(
 
So this is a personal want, not a character that you expect? If that's the case, what bad guy newcomers do you expect to see, if any?

I think King Boo would be cool (though I think the lack of feet would be a real issue...), but I don't expect to see him at all. Plus, we've already got Bowser (and Wario, kinda) for a Mario series villain. But King Boo is cool. It's lame that he's not even in Mario Kart anymore. =(

I don't really expect any more than we have already gotten to be honest. The closest to come to having a chance IMO is either Medusa or a Zelda baddie.
 
I don't know if I expect any villainous newcomers, but I've supported Captain Syrup, Medusa, and Ridley for the longest. Black Shadow and Porky would also be pretty fun if they could make the former interesting and scale down the latter.

Kamek and K. Rool are interesting choices too, but the former would really need a lot to stand out from standard Magikoopa enemies and Rool I just don't know enough about to suggest something unique.
 
Bumping this discussion for weekend SmashGAF. =P I'm really interested in hearing what people think about potential bad guy newcomers. Will we get any more this time? If so, who?

The problem is, most of the big series have one major, recurring bad guy, and then a few one-offs who aren't important enough for Smash (unless Sakurai is in one of his WFT moods, I guess.)

Mario has Bowser and then a bunch of one offs - Count Bleck, Grodus, Smithy, etc. No way we're seeing any of those guys in Smash. King Boo is an exception, but we already have so many Mario characters, we probably won't get any more.

Zelda has Ganondorf, and then people like Demise, Ghirahim, Queen Ambi, Onox, etc. Vaati is the only reasonable contender I can think of.

Kirby has DeDeDe, Meta Knight, and who else? Dark Matter? Kracko? (that would be hype, actually. New boss character?)

Point is, Smash already has most of the major, interesting bad guys. Captain Syrup and King K. Rool are about the only obvious choices I can think of who aren't already in.

Ridley goes without saying, of course.
 
So this is a personal want, not a character that you expect? If that's the case, what bad guy newcomers do you expect to see, if any?

I think King Boo would be cool (though I think the lack of feet would be a real issue...), but I don't expect to see him at all. Plus, we've already got Bowser (and Wario, kinda) for a Mario series villain. But King Boo is cool. It's lame that he's not even in Mario Kart anymore. =(

Hades as a newcomer would be cool, but since I don't think Kid Icarus will get three spots in the roster I'd still prefer Palutena over him.
 
Ridley will be a stage hazard and K. Rool will (at best) be an Assist Trophy. Outside of maybe Bowser Jr., none of the remaining Nintendo villains are well-known/recurring enough to be playable.
 
King Boo could be a very cool boss rather than a playable character. Villains are good material for bosses, but if those are limited to stage bosses like the Yellow Devil then I can see some villains getting in the game.

I can see King K. Rool as possible because of that, besides DK deserves a third character and the other Kongs are a bit too same-y. Someone from Fire Emblem could be really cool and a nice change of pace too. A villain from Earthbound is not happening but best choice would be Porky, since he's the bad guy in two games. Kid Icarus is a hard one because Palutena is probably in and adding 2 characters could be a bit too much. From F-Zero I expect nothing unless a new game is announced at E3.

Mario could get a small villain like Bowser Jr. too, especially if we have as many Pokemon reps as we expect.
 
For someone who doesn't like them in the slightest (like me) it's more like the single redeeming quality they have.

Honest players still can choose not to abuse this. I hope Nintendo won't remove the possibility to "skip" these guys in future titles.

Why do you hate them? It's sounding irrational. They have new ways of fighting Mario every time he faces them but you wouldn't like them no matter what they did? You'd rather have a giant goomba as a boss?

HEfzMB8.png


x67EKfk.jpg


m7WVQ3n.jpg


iJsayb7.png


L514Oqr.png


Jl8CZUo.png


I mean, Monty Tank was cool but the Koopalings have at least as much diversity. If it weren't for that one flaw where you can attack them before they start another phase they'd be more challenging than those bosses for sure.

TSIHTDi.png


pF0ZrBr.png


10YnxsT.png


w8uO3dG.png


k2mgt3g.png


LpngFsJ.png


RXeAWAJ.png
 
Top Bottom