MPAA Rejects Eva Green Poster for 'Sin City: A Dame to Kill For'

Status
Not open for further replies.

Enduin

No bald cap? Lies!
Her nails and eyes look terrible. I mean I get highlighting them, but at least do it well.

Also once again MPAA is stupid puritanical bullshit. You see far worse ads all over the place. NYC has like 200 foot ad screens with SI and lingerie models showing way more than that.
 

inky

Member
It bothers me that her boob silhouette is visible but her arm behind it isn't.

I'm picky.

You can see it (at least I can clearly enough) and I'm sure it'd be more noticeable in a non-lossy .jpg.

It's closer to the light source and not being shaded by another body part so I think it actually looks like it should.
 

zoozilla

Member
Eva Green is never not a dame.

I just wish she chose movies I was more interested in than 300: The Sequel and Sin City: The Sequel.
 
It's too sexy. She's not supposed too look sexy and stuff because she may enjoy being sexy and women are not supposed to enjoy sex or their own sexiness,

Or some bullshit like that.

me gusta
 

Bodacious

Banned
She's in a show on Showtime right now called Penny Dreadful. I haven't been watching .. any boobage yet? Almost inevitable, isn't it?
 
tumblr_ldk361VlLs1qco4keo1_400.jpg


Frank Cross: I want to see her nipples.
Censor Lady: But this is a CHRISTMAS show.
Frank Cross: Well, I'm sure Charles Dickens would have wanted to see her nipples.
Carpenter: You can barely see them nipples.
Frank Cross: See? And these guys are REALLY looking.
 
tumblr_ldk361VlLs1qco4keo1_400.jpg


Frank Cross: I want to see her nipples.
Censor Lady: But this is a CHRISTMAS show.
Frank Cross: Well, I'm sure Charles Dickens would have wanted to see her nipples.
Carpenter: You can barely see them nipples.
Frank Cross: See? And these guys are REALLY looking.
That movie is so underrated.
 

Kaldea

Member
You can see it (at least I can clearly enough) and I'm sure it'd be more noticeable in a non-lossy .jpg.

It's closer to the light source and not being shaded by another body part so I think it actually looks like it should.

Oh, I'm not saying I can't see it at all. Clearly they're more focused on accentuating her breast and that's fine. Still looks off to me. :p
 

liquidtmd

Banned
I've rejected the MPAA for years.

"The gun that can murder people is fine, but you can kinda sorta see a woman's natural boob outline so BANNED Lolol"
 

Iadien

Guarantee I'm going to screw up this post? Yeah.
What's the big deal, is it the gun or the breasts?

Such a joke, there are far worse posters out there.
 
Is this a nipple thing? I can forward an annotated diagram of the female reproductive system complete with locations to the MPAA if needed. It's a bit crude in proportion, in green biro, and there's a cameo appearance from vhappy looking dude who may resemble me. Kinda.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom