What is it about western comics manga readers are turned off by? (& vice-versa)

Status
Not open for further replies.
But, but there are Dragonball Z and GT! Its so strange an confusing!

(Can I start reading Dragonball Z without Knowledge of Dragonball? I think not, I think its way to hard to get the informations, why Son Goku is dead and all this stuff and why are there people with Ape-Tails and why are there so many Aliens so suddenly?)

I still dont understand the difficulty in useing Google to search for a summary.

So people who pick up issue 527 of Detective Conan arent confused, why this little boy acts like a teenage dude? Or people who want to pick up Ranma 1/2 issue 787 why this girl can change into a boy?
First sentence shows that don't know what you are even talking about. There is no GT manga material to begin with.

Secondly you point to summaries for comics, because they are hard to get into, but you have a problem to use the same principle for manga. Tz
 
Marvel and DC's main universes I feel are an inherently and fundamentally terrible way to tell a story, shit never ends, it changes writers all the time and everything being connected leads to both a ton of plotholes and nothing mattering in the long run. If the same thing was done in Manga form I'd still hate it.

I have no real problem with most Western comics, I think The Goon is pretty rad and The Watchmen is one of my favorite pieces of media, but generally I really don't like the artstyle most Western comic artists tend to use. It all looks the same to me and is generally pretty ugly. I'm also not a fan of musclemen outside of JoJo's Bizarre Adventure, so that design type being far more common in Western comics is also a turnoff. I also think colored comic/manga art in general looks really shitty.

I think the absolute biggest difference for me is the difference in the way the two styles draw faces. I really, REALLY do not like the way 99% of Western artists draw faces.

Also, now, I haven't been able to bring myself to stand the art long enough to read very many full comics, but based on them and everything I've seen/heard in the periphery, Western comics tend not to have a very big focus on the actual fighting in most action stories. Like, there seems to be less of a focus on the big finishing moves and attacks and more seems to have one or two panels of zip zap zoom and puncharoo then the bad guy is on the ground.
The big unbeatable guy doesn't seem ever be beat by fighting spirit, they always beat everyone then there's a big moment where they disable his super stuff and suddenly they've won the fight. But, I am probably completely wrong, that's just what I've seen from most of them, I'm sure there are plenty with amazing fights and big climactic finishing moves, but that's not the general product I associate with Western comics.
 
I never thought I'd see some Ibañez praise @ GAF :D

Clever & Smart can be very funny but... I can't get over the fact that Ibañez so obviously ripped off Franquin, more than once.

sac-elg.jpg


Seriously...
 
Clever & Smart can be very funny but... I can't get over the fact that Ibañez so obviously ripped off Franquin, more than once.

sac-elg.jpg


Seriously...

Yeah, it is well known that Ibáñez took a lot of inspiration from other comics, sometimes to a fault.
 
(Can I start reading Dragonball Z without Knowledge of Dragonball? I think not, I think its way to hard to get the informations, why Son Goku is dead and all this stuff and why are there people with Ape-Tails and why are there so many Aliens so suddenly?)

So people who pick up issue 527 of Detective Conan arent confused, why this little boy acts like a teenage dude? Or people who want to pick up Ranma 1/2 issue 787 why this girl can change into a boy?

Dragonball, Ranma 1/2 and Detective Conan all start at #1 and you read it in order. DB and Ranma are finished. Nobody would pick up any other issue than #1 to start and read to the last issue.
 
I like both, but US comics are, generally speaking, super hero stuff, which I personally find to be mindnumbingly boring garbage. Doesn't help that there's X amounts of different universes involving the same characters, and series that never seem to end, which is why I prefer series and graphic novels that have a definite ending, like Sandman, V for Vendetta, From Hell, Don Rosa's Duck comics etc.
 
Also, now, I haven't been able to bring myself to stand the art long enough to read very many full comics, but based on them and everything I've seen/heard in the periphery, Western comics tend not to have a very big focus on the actual fighting in most action stories. Like, there seems to be less of a focus on the big finishing moves and attacks and more seems to have one or two panels of zip zap zoom and puncharoo then the bad guy is on the ground.
The big unbeatable guy doesn't seem ever be beat by fighting spirit, they always beat everyone then there's a big moment where they disable his super stuff and suddenly they've won the fight.
But, I am probably completely wrong, that's just what I've seen from most of them, I'm sure there are plenty with amazing fights and big climactic finishing moves, but that's not the general product I associate with Western comics.

while the scenario is more than often not true, comics often have "fighting spirit" scenes. hell, thats spideys go to. speech and all
 
while the scenario is more than often not true, comics often have "fighting spirit" scenes. hell, thats spideys go to. speech and all

Like I said, I've not really read many, but what about finishing moves? Like, the best moments of every Shonen Manga is when they do their big super move at the end of an arc and that's the moment to look back on. I never hear about that stuff in comics.

One Piece does this in every arc, it's one of the main draws to keep reading.

Naruto is essentially just fluff between big dumb finishing moves.

I don't know, that's just what I usually look for in battles.
 
Like I said, I've not really read many, but what about finishing moves? Like, the best moments of every Shonen Manga is when they do their big super move at the end of an arc and that's the moment to look back on. I never hear about that stuff in comics.

3035408-9598821140-Cyclo.jpg
 
Western comics (including Bandes Dessinées) are too expensive compared to manga, especially when you can buy and read the stuff from Japan. Drop the stupid colour, it just makes it more costly!

The manga scene is also much broader.
I mean, just compare the amount of erotic or porn comics to hentai.
 
I grew up with Franco/Belgian comics, stuff like Thorgal, Yoko Tsuno, Blake & Mortimer, Valerian & Laureline etc. Never been interested in superhero comics.

I always wondered whether Yoko Tsuno is read in Japan, since the main character is Japanese.

daughter-cover.jpg
 

That's pretty awesome and I have heard about that in the past, but how common is stuff like that? Whenever I read it there's very little fighting with the big enemy.

Just for the record, in case I'm unclear on this with my wording, I'm not trying to demean comics or get argumentative, I just don't have a great frame of reference for these types of comics and am genuinely curious.
 
Both genres have really stupid shit in them. I don't find one better than the other just different.

Anyone who is still reading Naruto but swears Superhero comics are dumb is remedial.
 
"Shonen" isn't a genre. You mean shonen action manga I guess.

Personally I can't get into super hero comics because it takes itself too seriously for what it is imo. Also, why the fuck do you have to reboot everything. At least most manga series are One series = One author (or a duo).
At least your average fighting manga knows its audience is kids and teenagers so it's still good fun.
I also think there are more themes in manga that I find appealing. You have sports stuff, lots of really great slice of life series...
Franco-belgian comics are great though, better than American comics imo

Oh, sorry, I'm not too familiar with manga but I always thought it was a genre. You learn something new everyday.

When it comes to comics, does any other country put out slice of life stuff like Japan? Seems like most western stories need to have some kind of goal.
 
Anyone who is still reading Naruto but swears Superhero comics are dumb is remedial.

I only know like, one or two people that still read Naruto that claim it's not dumb, everyone else I know who still reads (Like, 5-6) openly admit it's terrible but they're too deep in. But, pretty much everyone I know who likes comics (8 or so people) all claim the mainline DC and Marvel are all great and that people don't give it a fair chance.

Not saying that's the consensus, just my personal experience.
 
It's like Image, Valiant, IDW, Dark Horse, Vertigo (DC imprint, I know), Dynamite, and probably quite a few others I'm forgetting don't even exist in these threads.
 
Speaking from personal experience, I'd say character growth is what important. You have a sense of progression from characters in manga, even in average shounen/battle manga; that you don't normally get from western superhero comics.

I felt like if I stopped reading a superhero series at one point in time, and pick it up years later, I won't feel like I'm missing anything. I can't say the same with One Piece, for example.

Granted, I stopped reading comics years ago and went fully into manga so I probably missed on more recent offerings. Gotham Central and The Sandman were probably my favourite superhero series (If you can call it that.)
 
Because comics are niche, Marvel and DC aren't.

If we're comparing western (really American) comics and manga, it kind of helps to be aware of the breadth of both if you're going to participate in the discussion, no? Almost all the complaints against "western" comics in here are really just complaints about the big two. But the OP didn't ask "why don't you like superhero comics?" He asked "why don't you like western comics?" and even made sure to include non-Marvel/DC stuff in the OP.

Both genres have really stupid shit in them. I don't find one better than the other just different.

Anyone who is still reading Naruto but swears Superhero comics are dumb is remedial.
Word.
 
I only know like, one or two people that still read Naruto that claim it's not dumb, everyone else I know who still reads (Like, 5-6) openly admit it's terrible but they're too deep in. But, pretty much everyone I know who likes comics (8 or so people) all claim the mainline DC and Marvel are all great and that people don't give it a fair chance.

Not saying that's the consensus, just my personal experience.

I mean how am I suppose to respond to anecdotal evidence? I mean I guess I could post my own that runs counter to yours but that's rather pointless.

Because comics are niche, Marvel and DC aren't.

By this argument most of these slice of life type manga people like and are using as their argument are niche, while the battle shonen like Naruto, Bleach, and One Piece aren't.
 
I usually just buy trade paperbacks of comics, self contained story arcs. I'd go crazy trying to catch up with every issue in every week and stuff.

I have a disinterest in manga because it's near impossible to find in stores at a good price. and when I do find it, it's stuff I have no that looks off-putting, it's also censored most of the time. Even if the subject matter disgusts me, censorship disgusts me even more,
 
I actually like quite a number of Western comics, but I'm just not interested in superhero stories. Same with me for manga though. I'd much rather read slice of life or other stories that don't focus on superpowers and fighting. It's just that manga caters to that a lot more than western comics.
 
Don't read much of either, although I can't imagine ever wanting to delve into anything in the world of Marvel or DC outside of isolated side stories or maybe a graphic novel here or there. I have Watchmen in my bookshelf and my copy of Sandman Omnibus vol. 1 arrived in the post today, although I haven't had a chance to read any of it yet. I'm hoping it's mainly a stand-alone thing that doesn't require knowledge of the DCU, but I'm going in basically blind on recommendations from others.
 
For me it's generally art style preferences. It's also easier (for me) to find more unique looking manga than it is to find unique looking comics.

I know not every western comic is "muscle guy / girl in suit fighting other human enemies" but I guess I'm not exposed to enough other material think otherwise. Show me nice western art / mechs and I'll read.

 
Don't read much of either, although I can't imagine ever wanting to delve into anything in the world of Marvel or DC outside of isolated side stories or maybe a graphic novel here or there. I have Watchmen in my bookshelf and my copy of Sandman Omnibus vol. 1 arrived in the post today, although I haven't had a chance to read any of it yet. I'm hoping it's mainly a stand-alone thing that doesn't require knowledge of the DCU, but I'm going in basically blind on recommendations from others.

Sandman requires no knowledge of the DCU to enjoy. It technically exists in that universe, but the most that's ever come of that are small guest spots from SM characters in odd issues of mainline DC titles.
 
By this argument most of these slice of life type manga people like and are using as their argument are niche, while the battle shonen like Naruto, Bleach, and One Piece aren't.
Some aren't niche

These are the 10 best selling manga series. 3 of them are shonen battle but this is still a pretty diverse set of titles.

One Piece
Golgo 13
Dragon Ball
Kochikame
Conan
Naruto
Oishinbo
Slam Dunk
Doraemon
Touch
Dokaben


And even within the genre One Piece is about pirates, Naruto Ninjas, Dragonball is based of chinese folktales etc.
 
If we're comparing western (really American) comics and manga, it kind of helps to be aware of the breadth of both if you're going to participate in the discussion, no? Almost all the complaints against "western" comics in here are really just complaints about the big two. But the OP didn't ask "why don't you like superhero comics?" He asked "why don't you like western comics?" and even made sure to include non-Marvel/DC stuff in the OP.
By this argument most of these slice of life type manga people like and are using as their argument are niche, while the battle shonen like Naruto, Bleach, and One Piece aren't.

Comics/manga themselves are niche, which is why most of this thread is only about the ones that aren't. Because people who don't actually read comics are going to post anyway and only know of the big two. It's just the problem with this type of discussion taking place on a forum not dedicated to comics/manga, not everyone that is going to see the thread is going to have the same level of exposure or interest in the discussion, but they see it anyway and there's no reason they can't post.

I mean how am I suppose to respond to anecdotal evidence? I mean I guess I could post my own that runs counter to yours but that's rather pointless.

Also, not using it an argument, just using my experience to show that some people acknowledge the quality of what they're reading to be low.
 
http://static.comicvine.com/uploads/original/10/109694/3035408-9598821140-Cyclo.jpg[IMG][/QUOTE]

That isn't much of a special move, it's more like "here's a showcase of Cyclops power level, which may or may not be relevant in the future since the various writers on Xmen books since then don't always want him doing that".
 
For me it's generally art style preferences. It's also easier (for me) to find more unique looking manga than it is to find unique looking comics.

I know not every western comic is "muscle guy / girl in suit fighting other human enemies" but I guess I'm not exposed to enough other material think otherwise. Show me nice western art / mechs and I'll read.

is that oh great? because my god i love his two page spreads in air gear(crappy story but my god those spreads)

edit: also i guess im one of the few people on gaf who still kinda likes naruto ( storys been kinda going up and down but its not been all bad :T bleach to be honest is kinda meh)
 
From reading these post people think western comics are just the superhero stuff? I read western comics but none of them are superhero stuff (reading Saga ATM)..
 
On average I prefer manga because holy shit comics can be so fucking bad, but the best of comics easily kicks manga's ass to the curb. I've yet to read a manga series as good as Watchmen, Arkham Asylum, Hellblazer or Sandman, to name a few.

The annoying thing about the average comic(I'm going to generalize a bit here) is that they try to be super detailed and realistic, but that makes the errors and flaws all the more apparent, and the composition can be stilted and sterile. Compared to the average manga, which can be quite dynamic and visceral western comics can often look like a series of pictures just haphazardly put together with no real thought. The artists/writers don't make good use of the amount of space, control and production values they have. But when they do, the results are breathtaking.
 
Oh Great should really never write again; his shit makes Naruto read like fucking Nobel Prize material.

Comics/manga themselves are niche, which is why most of this thread is only about the ones that aren't. Because people who don't actually read comics are going to post anyway and only know of the big two. It's just the problem with this type of discussion taking place on a forum not dedicated to comics/manga, not everyone that is going to see the thread is going to have the same level of exposure or interest in the discussion, but they see it anyway and there's no reason they can't post.

That's a strength because this way people CAN be exposed to these lesser known manga/comics.

On a forum dedicated to manga and comics this thread would turn out about the same. One group who doesn't actually read anything from the other group making assumptions and making a list of things they hate about said group while claiming what they read is better and writing a list of reasons why. Both lists can be attributed to the other group.
 
It seems that in this thread there's a lot of people talking way outside their spheres of reference, especially manga fans looking at western comics. I see a few people mentioning 40+ year stories and that just isn't the case. While western properties might be monolithic and decades old, they're broken down into what is known as "runs" - this is usually a set number of issues by a creative team or writer and when finished, can and should be considered (if executed well) a complete story. For example, Joss Whedon's X-Men run is four volumes and that's it. You can read just these four books and get a story with a beginning, middle and end. The same is true for the vast majority of comics - they have a malleable shared history, but the runs themselves are very often self contained and complete.

On the flipside, the idea of a 40+ volume story makes my head spin, there's very little in western comics that approaches that - I think maybe Bendis' Ultimate Spider-Man run is the only thing similar to manga in its structure (200 issues and counting, one story).

I guess most of the time it comes down to aesthetics. I enjoy some manga but while I enjoy the art styles, it's not the main style that I enjoy. I like the inventiveness and sheer scope of western comics more, I think there is a much broader amount of styles to choose from. But I guess that's merely what I've been exposed to, as with most folks in this thread.
 
Western comics or western superhero comics? Big difference.

I can say that superhero comics are a tough sell. Mangas tell a coherent story, from start to finish. Superhero comics are never ending grind, with endless stories, restarts, heroes stuck in limbo and never ageing, multiple series about the same characters being released at the same time. It's a pure mess.

Realistically unless you're a hardcore fan getting into superhero comics monthly is a terribly unappealing proposition. If you want to engage somebody with those stories give them paperbacks that collect concrete arcc and specific creator's runs.
 
From reading these post people think western comics are just the superhero stuff? I read western comics but none of them are superhero stuff (reading Saga ATM)..

It's like anime threads where people who don't like them say it's just about underage girls.

It seems that in this thread there's a lot of people talking way outside their spheres of reference, especially manga fans looking at western comics. I see a few people mentioning 40+ year stories and that just isn't the case. While western properties might be monolithic and decades old, they're broken down into what is known as "runs" - this is usually a set number of issues by a creative team or writer and when finished, can and should be considered (if executed well) a complete story. For example, Joss Whedon's X-Men run is four volumes and that's it. You can read just these four books and get a story with a beginning, middle and end. The same is true for the vast majority of comics - they have a malleable shared history, but the runs themselves are very often self contained and complete.

Honestly that's not something that would make me read them.
In the manga industry most series belong to one author/duo, this is what I like. Of course sometimes you can have a couple of spin-offs especially when your series is highly popular but still, that's different. You don't have constant reboots/new run of old series. I see why some people might love that though.
I'm not sure that we'll get new Naruto/whatever series in 40 years by new authors (I could be wrong of course).
 
That's a strength because this way people CAN be exposed to these lesser known manga/comics.

On a forum dedicated to manga and comics this thread would turn out about the same. One group who doesn't actually read anything from the other group making assumptions and making a list of things they hate about said group while claiming what they read is better and writing a list of reasons why. Both lists can be attributed to the other group.

I'm not saying it's all a negative, it's just a reason why a good amount of this discussion is so, for lack of a better term, surface.

As for the discussion, I think it would have a lot of the same posts, but the ratio of informed to not informed would be leaning more towards the informed side of things. But, manga and comic fans can't seem to get along for shit, so there'll never really be a forum dedicated to both without constant arguing making the point moot. I guess GAF is as good a middle ground as any.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom