Rise of the Tomb Raider timed Xbox exclusive for Holiday 2015 (No PS/PC, SE publish)

Based on last gen results, willing to bet its a timed exclusive. Good on MS for money hatting. Keep throwing money at everything to make sure Xbone sell over the holidays, as that seems to be the only way they'll catch up to sony PS4 sales. SE is not stupid, free money for a minor IP timed exclusive is a great deal for them.
 
Iiab.png

It's published by MS studios so expect at PC version at some point. No play station version coming. This is why it's worded odd
 
How scummy is Sony for making No Man's Sky exclusive to the PS4? Is that a sign of everything that is wrong with Sony?

STOP. People in this thread have already explained the No Man's Sky situation and how it is drastically different but you continue to be obtuse. Stop making false equivalences.

One is a game that wouldnt have been made without the help of a publisher due to losing their game in a terrible accident (still coming to X1 and PC btw)

the other is a game that was shown at the Sony conference and now has turned exclusive for no reason at all.

Luckly I have an X1 but I'm pissed I cant get it on PC, which is how I played the first one.
 
Okay, if Square isn't even publishing, fine. Third party exclusives are garbage, but if Micorsoft is basically paying for the game, then sure that's fine by me.
 
Geoff Keighley ‏@geoffkeighley 2m
Spoke to many people here at Xbox press conference on Tomb Raider. Official line is that the game is "exclusive on Xbox for holiday 2015."

Unless it is coming to PC, then that is incorrect if MSFT is publishing.

The only certainty is it will not come to a Sony or Nintendo box.
 
This is crap...

I have both systems, just so I can play exclusives, but there is no way I am buying this.

You have exclusives that are made in house.

You have exclusives, like the recent Sunset Overdrive, where the developer gets to keep control of their product, so staying on one system makes sense.

You have exclusives, like Bayonetta 2, where one of the big companies helps fund the game which would have never been made otherwise.

With all of these I have no problem buying the game and is the reason I own all the major systems.

Then you have crap like this where one company pays to keep the game off other systems. This is complete anti-consumer shit. This is not helping the gamer. This is not creating exciting content for your fans. This is not making me want to support your company by hiring the most talented artist in the industry and giving them a chance to wow me. This is 100% complete mafia bullshit of taking out all competition and leaving me one single choice.

fuck you I am not supporting this...

Basically this.
 
This whole discussion around timed or not timed is going to force MS to open the check book once again to make it a full exclusive, like they did with Titanfall.
 
Good I guess? Lare Croft serie is still better and more fun though.

But it's still doesn't make sense. The first one sold more on PS3 with 2..22 millions unit and 1.71 on 360.
It also sold better on PS4 than Xbox one.

Considering that SE was disappointed in the sales of the first one this decision is pretty stupid. Or they got a big huge lump of cash.

Companies are taking the safe route now. A AAA next gen game is a big risk, especially for a shrinking Japanese company.

Its happening all the time now, through various deals.
 
What wording are people talking about making it seem like it will be timed? The wording in the OP sounds like a release window followed by platform.
 
Yeah if MSFT is publishing, that means this is wrapped up folks (unless you go with the SIGMA idea). It also means that MSFT might be interesting in more then just this one title, like it was theorized by some to go up against UC.

This actually makes a lot of sense now. I know most ps4 gamers would probably choose UC4 over TR if they could only pick one. Maybe SE actually saw that and decided to run with MS. It is still going to cripple TR's sales but my guess is MS will be eating most of the loss rather than SE. Gotta love those deep pockets!
 
All those posts stating that this is a timed exclusive, are basically port begging.

I don't own an Xbone, and probably never will, because I own a gaming PC, and will probably buy a WiiU. You lost your 5 dollars S-E (I'm a cheapass on PC).

Great move by Microsoft, the salt on this thread confirms that they struck were it hurts.

Not really, it's just reading between the lines of every statement which mention that it's an exclusive "on holiday 2015".
 
Wow. I'm like shell shocked right now. Like how much money did Microsoft pay them to make that happen!?

Guess I won't be jumping deep into this series.
 
i really don't understand why square would cripple such a well known brand in a popular genre that they just poured tens of millions in to re-energize and re-position for a modern audience by making it exclusive to one platform

when they say not a timed exclusive, maybe they could have like a rise of the tomb raider definitive all dlc edition on ps4/pc later. i don't want to sound like i'm getting legit mad about the platform choice, i'm just confused by the business choice here.
This too.
 
Hmm, pretty confusing. From that Xbox Wire link, seems Xbox is publishing it, so in that case, makes sense its exclusive (And hopefully means SE is putting more resources in KH3/FFXV...which SHOULD speed development).

But from that quote "Exclusive on Xbox for Holiday 2015", that makes it seem like a timed exclusive.

It seems that MS is publishing it though, so in that case, the exclusivity makes sense.
 
Good to see Microsoft is being proactive and securing high quality exclusive. It is exactly what they need to be doing right now.
 
Bloodborne wouldnt have been made had Sony not approached Miyazaki and From first. Bloodborne wasnt even in the works until that happened.

Stop trying to spin it to seem like Sony took that IP from expecting fans.

I am not spinning anything (and I am getting a PS4 for that game anyways), but do you really think FROM and Miyazaki would just be sitting around making nothing if Sony hadnt "approached them" for this game? The fact is that they would most probably have continued their agreement with NB and made the game for PC and Xbox-players as well if not Sony had stepped in and given them some benefits that NB wouldnt give. I dont care, I am playing the game on the PS4, but its stupid that people believe these situations really are so different, when they are not.
 
Consider this:

SE probably feels that Tomb Raider vs Uncharted 4 releasing at the same time on PS4 would be a sales slaughter in favor of UC4. Why not take money from MS for a timed exclusive, then try to pick up PS4 owners after they've already played through UC4? Win/win for SE.

People saying this was a bad deal for SE. Uncharted 4 is what was the bad deal for SE. They were going to get slaughtered in 2015 regardless of timed exclusivity. This way they get to save face and release on PS4 without competition in the same genre.

I can't see it man.

First of all, TR would have sold really great on all platforms regardless because the first was a hit commercially and critically. I don't think U4, even if it is released in the same month, would have taken sales away from it.

Secondly, there won't be a PS4/PC version shortly afterwards as it looks like MS is publishing the game.
 
6.3 million copies of the last TR were sold, over half of that were on two platforms prevented from being included in this newest version. How's that for numbers chum?

SQUARE-ENIX REVEALS SALES EXPECTATIONS FOR TOMB RAIDER

Tomb Raider has sold 3.4 million copies, failed to hit expectations

Also HELLO GAMES aren't exactly mom's basement indies, Joe Danger did pretty alright for them.

I'm certainly buying both, I don't see why one exclusive buyout is less ethical than the other.
 
I loved the 1st one so I'm excited for this. Sucks it's not multi-plat day 1(timed?), most likely would have bought the PS4 version. But my Xbox One needs more love so I'll pick it up day one.
 
Why are you bringing up something from like twenty years ago? Is that supposed to excuse MS?

maybe more of that Microsoft isn't the mafia trying strongarm the video game industry

GAF clutches onto those Sony nuts tightly despite doing the same thing in the past. Yet when Microsoft does it it's supposed to bring the apocalypse
 
Namco Bandai releases many games only on PS3/4, did you ever complain they are anti-consumer?

Yakuza is exclusive on PS3/4, did you ever complain SEGA is anti-consumer?

No ?

They are exclusive because the XBox 360 is irrelevant in the japanese market and those PS3 exclusives primarily target said japanese market for the grand majority of their sales !

...not to mention that Sony did not pay money to keep the games from appearing on the XBox ?!
 
Okay, this kinda sucks. I had very little interest in an Xbox One and I've been pretty happy with being in the Sony camp this gen (owned everything last gen). However, I did love TR and was looking forward to the sequel.

What's surprising to me is that while it was premiered at the Xbox conference during E3, no mention of exclusivity was made. Ergo, the odds that it was at the time exclusive aren't good. If they'd have known, surely they would have said so, it's kind of a megaton. I see tons of people here talking about how Sony didn't feature the game, but that's far from enough to have people read it as being exclusive. The reactions to these news is proof enough that most people assumed it was cross platform, and it probably was.


Might have to get an Xbox One in 2015 after all. Unless it's timed.
 
Hey Square, go die in a fire you worthless POS company.

Way to make Tomb Raider exclusive to the Xbox One. Scared that you won't meet sales targets without Microsoft's money huh? Fuck you if you think I'm paying for this now after you just shat on your fanbase. That's going to hold up, right? Fucking making this exclusive to the Xbox One despite Tomb Raider's history on the Playstation? You're a bunch of clowns. I take it as a personal insult that you mouthbreathers are allowed to make decisions with regards to how franchises I used to really love are handled. Your asses got bailed out when you purchased Eidos because their president, like all of you, was a complete and utter mook. I make two better executives than your entire company combined in the toilet every morning before I go to work. I look forward to the day that your company crashes and burns into the fucking sea, only to be picked apart as salvage by western iOS developers, at which time the franchises you've already defiled with incompetence and negligence can be finally whored out to smartphones.

That's assuming you asshats don't beat your eventual western smartphone overlords to the punch, which you probably will because you give fuck all about the legacy of these franchises, to say nothing about just how little regard you hold towards the fans who made them what they where.

As the owner of a PS4 please go swallow glass

Never been more appropriate ;)

Stay classy gamers.

Haha this is embarrassing.
 
LOLOL I cant believe MS is still shelling out cash for 3rd party timed exclusivity.

I guess they finally figured out how to prevent a DF comparison article.
 
It's like people forget the days of 16-bit and 32-bit consoles where different console ports frequently had different publishers. It's not like this would be a new thing.
 
Top Bottom