JohnnyLovesYou
Banned
Absolutely. Game is unplayable if main character doesn't look like me or my people.
OT: Of course not.
Yeah, but this is not all about *your* experience. I understand you buy game with diverse main characters, but most development cost is put on stuff that feature the same "generic" 30-something white hetero male.I don't agree with that at all. At least not for the games that *I* am buying.
I just picked up Diablo 3 (various characters), Metro Redux (Russian), Sword Art Online: Hollow Fragment (Japanese), inFAMOUS First Light (Woman), and Tales of Xillia 2 (white jrpg male). And for lots of the upcoming games I'm buying this year there's custom characters, women, an Indian/Tibetan male, The Toad, etc.
That's not the same dude over and over for me, personally. There's games out there and lots of games coming if you want them where you aren't just some nondescript white-American-ish guy. Support those games and stop buying the "nondescript white-American-ish guy" over and over (which there's not many of in the coming months at all).
If so many people don't care about race/gender/sexuality etc., how come so many people push against cries for better and more representation of people who aren't White, heterosexual men?
If so many people don't care about race/gender/sexuality etc., how come so many people push against cries for better and more representation of people who aren't White, heterosexual men?
Yeah, but this is not all about *your* experience. I understand you buy game with diverse main characters, but most development cost is put on stuff that feature the same "generic" 30-something white hetero male.
I don't strictly believe in "voting with your wallet", because my choices of what to buy are directly related to what's available and what I specifically want in terms of gameplay for example. There is no reason we shouldn't make it clear to developers we want them to diversify and reevaluate what they consider as "generic" so that we can have better options as gamers.
Yeah, it's not, but I buy shitloads of games, not just a few (20+ more through the year's end). It's absolutely true that there's been an oversaturation in the past, but recently developers have been a lot better about it. The upcoming games for the rest of the year are also pretty diverse and not "just for me". Maybe you should look at release calendars before making blanket statements.
If so many people don't care about race/gender/sexuality etc., how come so many people push against cries for better and more representation of people who aren't White, heterosexual men?
I don't really tend to make much noise on this issue when it comes up, but I don't see why someone personally not caring about what race/sex they're playing as, has to mean that they don't think those that do care should have more options available to them.
I don't know, it just seems to me like there's always a whole army of gamers who suddenly have an opinion when it comes to race/sexuality/gender of characters whenever the topic comes up. See Sarkeesian threads as a prime example, especially the first couple of ones. They were brimmed with overly defensive gamers who couldn't stand that their video games were criticized for their representation of women.
I don't know, it just seems to me like there's always a whole army of gamers who suddenly have an opinion when it comes to race/sexuality/gender of characters whenever the topic comes up. See Sarkeesian threads as a prime example, especially the first couple of ones. They were brimmed with overly defensive gamers who couldn't stand that their video games were criticized for their representation of women.
I'm not white, don't care what race or sex the main character is. I don't look for 'representation' in games, they're simply forms of entertainment and nothing more for me.
If so many people don't care about race/gender/sexuality etc., how come so many people push against cries for better and more representation of people who aren't White, heterosexual men?
I don't know, it just seems to me like there's always a whole army of gamers who suddenly have an opinion when it comes to race/sexuality/gender of characters whenever the topic comes up. See Sarkeesian threads as a prime example, especially the first couple of ones. They were brimmed with overly defensive gamers who couldn't stand that their video games were criticized for their representation of women.
But this isn't the same thing as "why is there so much defense of the white standard?" To them, the criticism of the broad swath of white male 25-35 avatars is unjust in both tone and principle. To them, it comes across as "you should have less" or "we don't want to see you" or "you shouldn't have what you want to have" or "your representation is a fault in itself."If so many people don't care about race/gender/sexuality etc., how come so many people push against cries for better and more representation of people who aren't White, heterosexual men?
I dont care whatsoever what the main character is, and it shouldn't even be an issue. Last i checked, video games are made for entertainment/to make money, not to make political statements.
First of all who are you to say what a video game should be? If someone wants to make a political statement with their game then more power to them.
Secondly, how is underrepresented people asking for representation in their entertainment a political statement?
Thought Emmett (Emmett Graves is his name) as a future cowboy was a good role for him, and the VA did an excellent job with the portrayal. He did good work on PSABR, too. It's a shame that'll probably be the last game we'll hear the character on.I personally would like to play as a black guy more often but no not really.
Edit: Actually I have a little more to say about this. I recently played Starhawk and it was nice to finally play as a black main character (Last one I can think of is Franklin in GTA V and the story isn't really about him) but the guy in the game is so bland I don't even remember his name. Really wish we got to know a little more about him, so yeah if we get a game with a black protagonist would like their to be a little more about him other then "HE'S BLACK! DIVERSITY!"
I dont care whatsoever what the main character is, and it shouldn't even be an issue. Last i checked, video games are made for entertainment/to make money, not to make political statements.
I think there's a lot of unintentional irony in anyone that can feel what you describe in the first paragraph as someone in a majority always catered to, included and shown but that can't understand or empathize with minorities wanting to feel included too. And I see it often enough in these threads to shake my head. We already had numerous people say it doesn't matter or who cares, not always in so many words in just this thread.But this isn't the same thing as "why is there so much defense of the white standard?" To them, the criticism of the broad swath of white male 25-35 avatars is unjust in both tone and principle. To them, it comes across as "you should have less" or "we don't want to see you" or "you shouldn't have what you want to have" or "your representation is a fault in itself."
To them, the criticism, and let's be fair, it's gone on enough now where there is a segment of vitriol of "fuck cis white males", is seen as a rallying cry to "oppress" them. So while they may not care what avatars they play as, they don't want someone stomping on the representations that do exist.
Basically, to them, they do not think it is valid to criticize what exists, but creating something new that caters to others is fine.
Do you honestly see it as a singularity of opinion? You're right, there is an army of outspoken idiots who will rail against any and all criticism because they don't see it the same way you do.
You ask:
But this isn't the same thing as "why is there so much defense of the white standard?" To them, the criticism of the broad swath of white male 25-35 avatars is unjust in both tone and principle. To them, it comes across as "you should have less" or "we don't want to see you" or "you shouldn't have what you want to have" or "your representation is a fault in itself."
To them, the criticism, and let's be fair, it's gone on enough now where there is a segment of vitriol of "fuck cis white males", is seen as a rallying cry to "oppress" them. So while they may not care what avatars they play as, they don't want someone stomping on the representations that do exist.
Basically, to them, they do not think it is valid to criticize what exists, but creating something new that caters to others is fine.
The Sarkesiaan videos are structured to look at the present examples as problems, so they appear to this segment as attacks, on their intelligence (what you like is stupid/wrong/hurtful/etc.) and on what they want. It doesn't help when they get faced with catty side remarks like "Don't worry, you'll still get your shooty shooty bang bangs for retards and mysogynists".
It's tone arguments coming from both sides, but it's scary how ignorant to what each side is actually saying. Scarier is how ignorant the 2nd wave of followers of each side side are on how to argue appropriately for proper education.
For the record, I side on the inclusionary side for proper representation and feel that there is an overwhelming abundance of the "classic" male representation. I just feel my opponents are often misrepresented.
Everyone posting here is 100% human (I think), so it's funny to me that they would be the same people who prefer to play a human hero in a fantasy game. If I work at a grocery store I don't want to play a video game about working at a grocery store. I want a real fantasy so I prefer to play as a non human. No one else feels like this?