This happens with every design that people don't agree on. It's as if people believe they had only ONE design drawn and then decided to go with it. I'm sure all these sketches that people are coming up with have been drawn and presented to the team by other concept artists. In the end, they decided on the one we're getting for a reason.
Guys. It's exhaust. With the side benefit of looking like a crossguard. Because this is Star Wars. And in Star Wars people use space swords. And it looks cool.
Do we really think they didn't consider other ways to make the cross saber? That they forgot to think about what it would be like for it to get hit?
From my original point of thinking, control over the length/shape of the blade had to be something defined earlier in the process, i.e. before the crystal, which I assumed to be the last item before the blade appeared. Looking at some wiki pages though, I see that isn't the case.
Okay, so it's something more like this?
That being the case, I can understand the hilt/crossguard needing to be made of something impervious to sabre blades.
I love the crudeness of the beam, the actual look of the blades is awesome.I really like the new saber, it seems somehow more believable now that the beam is crude and irregular.
I really like the new saber, it seems somehow more believable now that the beam is crude and irregular.
LOL, glad my assumption turned out to be not as wrong as I thought. Hardly a deal breaker but I hope there is some reason for it I find satisfying.
I love the crudeness of the beam, the actual look of the blades is awesome.
Has this been posted yet? It's George Lucas's special edition of the trailer.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v93Jh6JNBng&feature=share
Me too. I'm a huge sucker for things that spark and crackle like that in films, especially here where it's in contrast with the clean, restrained blades everyone else has.
![]()
Then you run into the opposite problem: Instead of the crossguard being useless for defense, it's a good way to accidentally slice your hand into two.In regards to peoples' issue with the crossguard of the lightsaber, what about just minimizing the length of the metallic portion of the crossguard on the handle? Sorry for the ghetto paint job, I don't have Photoshop:
![]()
Fan redesigns look cool to me, especially this crossed blade one.I feel like people hating on the crossguard are wrong. Any chop you make for the emitters leaves you completely exposed to the main blade.
Also the fan redesigns are undeniably worse. Which is why they don't have jobs working on designing lightsabers for Star Wars movies.
Has this been posted yet? It's George Lucas's special edition of the trailer.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v93Jh6JNBng&feature=share
Then you run into the opposite problem: Instead of the crossguard being useless for defense, it's a good way to accidentally slice your hand into two.
Really, I just think it looks cool and there are plenty of fan explanations (From exhaust ports to having beams inside the metal) that justify its bizarre design.
cant cool shit exist just to be cool?![]()
It really does look like the lower part of Vader's sabre, just a bit shorter.
![]()
Even the two exhaust tips look like Vader's.
cant cool shit exist just to be cool?![]()
cant cool shit exist just to be cool?![]()
It's more than a little silly to mock people looking for consistency within fiction. Just because it's fiction doesn't mean anything goes without explanation.No! It has to make sense in the context of fiction science from the 70's, that has changed several times, and contradicts itself several times without the new saber!
i.e. ppl be crazy.
It's more than a little silly to mock people looking for consistency within fiction. Just because it's fiction doesn't mean anything goes without explanation.
It's more than a little silly to mock people looking for consistency within fiction. Just because it's fiction doesn't mean anything goes without explanation.
I've made my explainations known, but I think this fan rendition isn't too bad.
![]()
Considering that you called the people who were complaining or interested in an explanation for the design, something to the tune of "very, very, very stupid," yes I would think some people are offended by your stupid notion that fictional consistency is laughable. It's not laughable, it's laudable.I think we already went over this a day ago. As long as people complain about it, people are gonna make jokes about those complaints. You seem to be constantly offended when people make fun of those complaints, though. Complaints =/= people.
Considering that you called the people who were complaining or interested in an explanation for the design, something to the tune of "very, very, very stupid,"
This GIF finally was made for the Episode VII Teaser. It pretty much sums up my first view (and every subsequent view) of the teaser:
![]()
This GIF finally was made for the Episode VII Teaser. It pretty much sums up my first view (and every subsequent view) of the teaser:
![]()
I think we already went over this a day ago. As long as people complain about it, people are gonna make jokes about those complaints. You seem to be constantly offended when people make fun of those complaints, though. Complaints =/= people.
I wonder what they plan on naming the new villain? I'm kinda hoping he's not a Sith Lord named "Darth" something. Looking at the list of Darths on the Wookiepedia, the majority of them are really stupid sounding. What would be next, Darth Stroyer, Darth Struction, Darth Villian? Vader still sounds the best(IMO).
This shot was gorgeous
![]()
I wonder what they plan on naming the new villain? I'm kinda hoping he's not a Sith Lord named "Darth" something. Looking at the list of Darths on the Wookiepedia, the majority of them are really stupid sounding. What would be next, Darth Stroyer, Darth Struction, Darth Villian? Vader still sounds the best(IMO).
You should do a review about the decline of plinkett reviewsYO you left the door open for me!
So, it was eh. Which is expected. Again, the reason his Star Wars & Star Trek reviews were good were a) he had literally YEARS worth of online discussion and analysis of those movies to metabolize and b) his schtick was still fresh feeling.
Stoklasa killed us all to death with those reviews because he just distilled all the great analysis written by tens of other (better) film writers into a much more easy to digest form, and then performed a very fun character.
Which is why when he goes back to Plinkett now, especially when it's only a couple days after an 88 second commercial has come out, it's so tired and empty. Because he doesn't have that knowledge base to draw from, and Plinkett isn't novel anymore, and even if he was, Stoklasa isn't doing him well anymore.
Trotting him out is just as perfunctory and rote as he makes it sound. Maybe that's part of the joke, but it's basically just that he knows this will give him hits so whether he wants to do it or not, he's gotta do it.
I wonder what they plan on naming the new villain? I'm kinda hoping he's not a Sith Lord named "Darth" something. Looking at the list of Darths on the Wookiepedia, the majority of them are really stupid sounding. What would be next, Darth Stroyer, Darth Struction, Darth Villian? Vader still sounds the best(IMO).
Gladly:Quote me.
The only thing that is stupid is ascribing to the idea that "cool things just exist to be cool." They don't. They should be cool, but also make sense and have sensible explanations for their function. We shouldn't just handwave any questions and say "it's fiction!" A good fictional universe isn't just full of cool stuff. It's full of cool stuff that works within the context of universe's established framework.I do have the right to voice my opinion on yours though. And yes, the nitpicking at things like lightsaber guards is stupid. Very very very stupid.
Of course, but until we get that official explanation for the design and function, it's a perfectly decent discussion to have.But they haven't even had a chance to give explanation. Chances are the team thought of many new designs for this cross saber and chose one with specific canon in mind. I'm sure at the very least, sometime we will get a new one of those Complete Visual Encyclopedias and it will have a blurb about its design purpose.
Precisely. The key of course to everything being explanation. If the writing can create a plausible explanation (within the framework of the fictional universe) for an event, survival, technology, etc, then that's fine.Guys, there's a difference between "magic exists" and "people randomly turn into purple hippos for three seconds every thursday with no explanation."
The idea of fantasy is to create a world that's different from our own but still follows rules. There are various impossible things in Star Wars: Faster-than-light travel is possible and easy, moon-sized space ships blow up planets, certain people have magic, etc. Yet despite those impossible things, Darth Vader won't suddenly survive a blast from the Death Star without explanation. That would be inconsistent with the rules previously constructed for the world, even though Darth Vader and the Death Star are completely fictional things that could never exist in our world.