Uncharted 4 Gameplay Demo [Up: Sony - Was running at 30 fps]

mikey1123 said:
Wow Crysis 3 pics...
Click to expand...

336625-img_1978_killzone2.jpg

gears_of_war_jedineka.jpg

e3-red-steel-screens-20060501034051480.jpg

irsuclfngzlpg1zkp9.jpg


hold dat L naughty dog
 
TheLostBigBoss said:
One looks like a doll, the other looks like someone who has been running around in a tropical rainforest for an hour and a half.

Both look good, but the amount of detail in the skin and lighting in UC4 blows Unity out of the water
Click to expand...

Maaaan, there's no way I can agree with that. Skin texture sure, the gruff sweaty dirty wrinkly guy looks more detailed, but the lighting is just on another level entirely with Unity. Unless you just mean how light on the skin looks in this particular compare. Yeah SSS shows much better on the left.
 
Gotdatmoney said:
Why the fuck does every game need to depict rocks and caves as looking wet? It's like they have never seen a cave or a cliff side. They don't all look like shiny slimy surfaces. It's something I thoroughly despise about current and last gen.
Click to expand...

Its raining inside the cave. That is why they are wet. There are non-wet sections of the cave too, just not in these screens.
 
DarkLordMalik said:
This is some real life level of shit.

wajgtf.gif


I have played Unity on PC and never came close to such realistic looking facial expressions. Kevin Spacey in Advanced Warfare is extremely good but has dead eyes syndrome.
Click to expand...

This looks absolutely stunning. People are really saying this doesn't look on par with the E3 close up teaser?? I think those of that opinion got their vision downgraded lol.
 
kinggroin said:
Maaaan, there's no way I can agree with that. Skin texture sure, the gruff sweaty dirty wrinkly guy looks more detailed, but the lighting is just on another level entirely with Unity. Unless you just mean how light on the skin looks in this particular compare. Yeah SSS shows much better on the left.
Click to expand...

I'm talking about the face, and UC4's lighting looks far better than the picture that was posted for Unity.
 
-griffy- said:
What we've seen of Uncharted 4 shows that it is obviously using more advanced tech, and on a basic level has higher fidelity effects than are present in Fox Engine games on PS4 (higher resolution shadows and textures, more accurate AO, etc). The IQ is better on an astronomical level (better anisotropic filtering, much cleaner anti-aliasing, alpha foliage and hair appears clean contrasted to the crosshatched mess present in Fox Engine). MGS Ground Zeroes/V looks pretty good considering it's running at 60fps. But it is far from a truly great looking, technical showcase of a game.
Click to expand...

That's such a polarized statement. That screen of MGS5 looks way better than the UC4 jungle presentation. Light propagation is evident in the leaves (there is none in UC4). Are you guys so drunk on seeing the first gameplay demo of UC4 that it just HAS to be better-looking than everything out there?

There was NOTHING astounding in that demo that hasn't been done before. The foliage is the best looking part of the gameplay. All the little subtleties are really nice touches but nothing that would scream "better looking". There are simply too many ND zealots defending their game even if it looks average for this generation. I've seen comments that it beats out AC:U, Order, Ryse, even have it compared to Pixar films.. the level of hype here is ridiculously biased.
 
Just rewatched the video. It looks absolutely fantastic. every thing is top notch. Iq is great, the only weak thing are bomb explosions. Looks so bad and have no area effect. Also it looks much better and more natural than cave in Crysis 3. Vegetations and interaction is also better
 
VFX_Veteran said:
That's such a polarized statement. That screen of MGS5 looks way better than the UC4 jungle presentation. Light propagation is evident in the leaves (there is none in UC4). Are you guys so drunk on seeing the first gameplay demo of UC4 that it just HAS to be better-looking than everything out there?

There was NOTHING astounding in that demo that hasn't been done before. The foliage is the best looking part of the gameplay. All the little subtleties are really nice touches but nothing that would scream "better looking". There are simple too many ND zealots defending their game even if it looks average for this generation. I've seen comments that it beats out AC:U, Order, Ryse, even have it compared to Pixar films.. the level of hype here is ridiculously biased.
Click to expand...

Lol, wut? Sounds like people clutching at straws...
 
Coolbgdog12 said:
This looks absolutely stunning. People are really saying this doesn't look on par with the E3 close up teaser?? I think those of that opinion got their vision downgraded lol.
Click to expand...
The detail
The lighting
The animation

And at the same time you can still see a bit of stylization on the model from the artwork it was modelled after.

Jesus

Naughty dog artists are on the same cloud in the sky with the R* artists.
 
The best looking parts of Uncharted games have always been the cities. You can pack them with details.

Those cliffs look good, but wait till we get somewhere like UC2's Nepal. That will blow minds.
 
Hoo-doo said:
Graphics were amazing, but more importantly it seems they improved gameplay.

Shootouts look like they are a lot more fun and dynamic. Grappling hook is ace.
Click to expand...

Yep, that's what I really took away from it. It looks like they learned a good bit from TLOU and are incorporating it in UC now. I can't wait to play it.
 
VFX_Veteran said:
That's such a polarized statement. That screen of MGS5 looks way better than the UC4 jungle presentation. Light propagation is evident in the leaves (there is none in UC4). Are you guys so drunk on seeing the first gameplay demo of UC4 that it just HAS to be better-looking than everything out there?

There was NOTHING astounding in that demo that hasn't been done before. The foliage is the best looking part of the gameplay. All the little subtleties are really nice touches but nothing that would scream "better looking". There are simply too many ND zealots defending their game even if it looks average for this generation. I've seen comments that it beats out AC:U, Order, Ryse, even have it compared to Pixar films.. the level of hype here is ridiculously biased.
Click to expand...

There is nothing in ACU that has never been done before but you going around saying it's best looking game ever so what is your point ?
If some people think UC4 is best looking console game so be it ( thought i think the order look better for now)
 
VFX_Veteran said:
That's such a polarized statement. That screen of MGS5 looks way better than the UC4 jungle presentation. Light propagation is evident in the leaves (there is none in UC4). Are you guys so drunk on seeing the first gameplay demo of UC4 that it just HAS to be better-looking than everything out there?

There was NOTHING astounding in that demo that hasn't been done before. The foliage is the best looking part of the gameplay. All the little subtleties are really nice touches but nothing that would scream "better looking". There are simply too many ND zealots defending their game even if it looks average for this generation. I've seen comments that it beats out AC:U, Order, Ryse, even have it compared to Pixar films.. the level of hype here is ridiculously biased.
Click to expand...
Yes its getting crazy here, I have even seen someone saying Tomb Raider looks better than Uncharted 4
 
I find it amusing seeing so many people in here trying to convince others that this somehow got a downgrade, or looks worse or yada yada. You're gonna have to try harder because no matter how many janky compressed pics are posted or random pics from other games are posted, my opinion on how utterly AMAZING Uncharted 4 looks ain't changing. Keep fighting that good fight though lol.
 
There's some indirect lighting effects going on with the flashlight during the cave section, I imagine it is a more advanced implementation of the effect seen on TLOU.
 
I thought it looked amazing, it blew the minds of my game playing friends and family. I go on GAF and "downgrade", "Ryse looks better", "lol Assassins Creed and Crysis (PC) shots".

Only here would one of the best looking games come under insane criticism. I understand why devs feel shitty half the time after footage of their hard work is shown.
 
VFX_Veteran said:
That's such a polarized statement. That screen of MGS5 looks way better than the UC4 jungle presentation. Light propagation is evident in the leaves (there is none in UC4). Are you guys so drunk on seeing the first gameplay demo of UC4 that it just HAS to be better-looking than everything out there?

There was NOTHING astounding in that demo that hasn't been done before. The foliage is the best looking part of the gameplay. All the little subtleties are really nice touches but nothing that would scream "better looking". There are simply too many ND zealots defending their game even if it looks average for this generation. I've seen comments that it beats out AC:U, Order, Ryse, even have it compared to Pixar films.. the level of hype here is ridiculously biased.
Click to expand...

Light propagation or not, the Uncharted 4 footage simply looks better than the footage we've seen of MGSV, for the reasons I plainly pointed out in my post. It's not about one singular effect. UC4 demo pretty clearly has stuff that the Fox Engine games just don't have. It has a better form of the soft ambient character shadows they created for The Last of Us (an effect I've never seen in another game). It has more advanced foliage interaction. It has a more intelligent animation system, something that carries through and improves with every one of their games going back to Jak and Daxter. The base assets are obviously higher fidelity (higher resolution textures, higher poly models, etc). I mean, this is obvious stuff. MGSV is a cross gen, closer to open world game that is sticking strictly to 60fps on current systems. There's a tradeoff and limitation built in there.

UC4 may not be showing anything truly groundbreaking in this footage, but it's doing a great many small things exceedingly well that add up to one impressive package for such an early demo. Which is kind of exactly what Naughty Dog does.

I've never said UC4 is better than everything out there. Weird to point at my post to bring that up.
 
I just want to clarify. The naughty dog team is incredibly talented at creating industry leading graphics. My comments are never meant to start controversy or to "hate" on a game for the heck of it. I just call things as i see them in the current state something is presented with no bias.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Far Cry 4 now runs at 60 fps on PS5
2 3
100
4K
LakeOf9 replied
Project Spectrum (Horror FPS) Exclusive Gamescom Gameplay
6
248
March Climber replied
Phantom Blade Zero Gameplay Demo
2 3 4
161
3K
Thief1987 replied
DQVII Re-imagined gameplay demo from TGS 2025.
5
143
Dr. Wilkinson replied
Borderlands 4 runs at 30FPs Docked on Nintendo Switch 2
Platform  2 3 4 5 6
270
3K
tkscz replied
Top Bottom