The Witcher 3 | Review Thread

lol @ these reviews, it's like everybody reviewed a different game. There's proabably every combination of these out there: great strory/shit story, great open world/awful open world, meaningful sub-quests/boring fetch-quests and colectathons, amazing combat/crap combat.

What? Did you not see all the 9's and 10's? Only 9's and 10's.
 
Kevin also gave Dragon Age a 9 and Bloodborne a 9 his opinion doesn't mean much.

Not to mention CD flew the gamespot guys out to their workplace for like a week.

I was right, there was no way this game wasn't going to get high scores regardless of it's actual quality.

Ah I see your conspiracy theory is still going strong.
 
lol @ these reviews, it's like everybody reviewed a different game. There's proabably every combination of these out there: great strory/shit story, great open world/awful open world, meaningful sub-quests/boring fetch-quests and colectathons, amazing combat/crap combat.

Yeah, it's like the game was reviewed by different people, right?!
 
The fact in the GS review he says this game is easier than the previous is very appealing to me. I found the witcher 2 very hard to get into and gave up fairly quickly.
 
6QjPPYi.png
 
tbh i expected more 10's but this shows again another overhyped game.

Don't get me wrong, i'm sure it will be an amazing game but i personally kept my hype in check since the other two previous Witcher games were far from being masterpieces.

So anything that doesnt get 10s across the board is overhyped? I don't know if your hype is as "in check" as you think...
 
Great reviews all around. Getting PS4 version myself.

But the highest score was Ghost Recon: Advanced Warfighter with a 9.9. But strangely the score was changed to 9.1

It's not that rare, but you can see that only well regard games received a score like this.
They explained that the reviewer wanted to give the game a 10, but their editor in chief said "No" to it and it got down to a 9.9, which was still a bit much for the game.
 
Wonder why they didn't send out PC codes, but you have to wonder the framerate on the Xbox One if all they sent out were PS4 codes.
 
While you certainly have a point, saying that in a thread dedicated to reviewers putting numbers out and generally hyping people around seem fairly counter-intuitive, don't you think?

No. Reviews threads for hyped games are consistently among the shittiest threads that this site has to offer. And it's precisely because fanboys and/or trolls can't handle the fact that reviewers disliked perceived great game/liked perceived trash game. Mind you, I have no problem with people actually delving into the review text to question certain aspects of a review or highlight concerns. But kneejerk reactions to the scores serve as the fuel for abysmal conversations that often result in a lot of gray names.

So, no, I don't think my statement was counterintuitive. I understand that we can't ever get away from reacting to scores entirely, but we can try and grow up a little in terms of how we react to "game I liked was scored a couple of points too high/low."
 
From the Gamespot review...

"Kevin VanOrd has played all three Witcher games and read several of the novels. He spent about 100 hours with The Witcher 3 on a PlayStation 4 debug system, a version that included the games' day-one patch. He uses the word "ploughing" in everyday speech. "

100 hours is enough to pass judgement on anything that isn't an MMO.

Not for RPGs. I mean this as a general point about reviewing RPGs. Look at Pillars of Eternity, not a single reviewer noted the serious bugs that existed in the game released on day 1 nor the terrible balance issues once your party got beyond level 10.

This is not to knock the reviewers, what they're doing should best be described as a tentative, first blush impression of the game. RPGs are very complex games. It is virtually impossible for a reviewer, in 100 hours, to accurately assess how buggy the game is (and a game of this size will doubtlessly have large amounts of bugs big and small), balance, quality/depth of combat, encounter design and choice and consequence.

The best he can say is that he had a good time with it. Which is unsurprising, given that he uses 'ploughing' in everyday speech.
 
Fuck it. Preordered on GOG. No matter if the 2GB VRAM on my GTX770 will be enough. CDR is getting every penny I spend on this game.
 
Whoa, these review are catching me offguard. I did not see this coming, and this is now on my radar as a sure buy. Will wait for the initial impressions here on GAF of course, and the almost guaranteed week 1 patch.
 
Wait, no Xbox review copies? But it's advertised with Xbox lol

Can we expect some reviewers to boost scores if Xbox performs better? Or will 900p cancel that out?

Also, if this was reviewed with the patch... will PS4 receive another one or are we stuck with the framerate?
 
Not for RPGs. I mean this as a general point about reviewing RPGs. Look at Pillars of Eternity, not a single reviewer noted the serious bugs that existed in the game released on day 1 nor the terrible balance issues once your party got beyond level 10.

This is not to knock the reviewers, what they're doing should best be described as a tentative, first blush impression of the game. RPGs are very complex games. It is virtually impossible for a reviewer, in 100 hours, to accurately assess how buggy the game is (and a game of this size will doubtlessly have large amounts of bugs big and small), balance, quality/depth of combat, encounter design and choice and consequence.

The best he can say is that he had a good time with it. Which is unsurprising, given that he uses 'ploughing' in everyday speech.

It's possible that several of the PoE reviewers didn't encounter any bugs. I put over 50 hours into the game during the week following release, and I didn't encounter a single issue.

Also, I think that ploughing thing was a joke.
 
So now I'm wondering if I totally misjudged this series. I played about an hour of the first Witcher game and got bored. Never tried the second game...
 
But...but...the body language of that tweet!

Lots of extremely positive statements in these reviews. Despite the flaws in the first two Witcher games, they became two of my favourite RPGs ever. And it looks like this is going to stand amongst them.
 
Top Bottom