|OT| Hillary Clinton testifies before the House Select Committee on Benghazi

Status
Not open for further replies.
This is completely untrue. This false equivalency non-sense really needs to stop.

I was being sarcastic. Also, it's technically 'false balance' because it's about truth as it relates to a single issue/subject, whereas false equivalencies are usually about comparing two or more different things.
 
Anti-intellectualism and trying to bully people into yes-no responses so they're "easier to understand" is the greatest plague on the country currently. These are supposed to be smart people and they barely understand the english language.
 

Cagey

Banned
His "this is a yes or no question" crap is like something you would expect from a bad debate on the internet.

He's cross-examining Hillary Clinton as if she were a witness in a trial, where the standard tactic to only ask questions where a witness can respond yes/no, except this Congressional hearing doesn't have the strict rules applied to cross-examination where a witness asked a yes/no question must, in fact, answer yes/no.

The tactic is make him appear like a no-nonsense straight shooter, and have Hillary give longer answers to appear like she's dodging a "simple" question. Content doesn't matter.
 

Bowdz

Member
Pompeo' seems more nervous that Hilldawg. Dude is mumbling and speeding through his sentences like a virgin asking out a supermodel.
 

DOWN

Banned
His yes or no questions are pathetic. Did he really think she would go down this list of questions without ever elaborating?
 
Dan Pfeiffer ‏@danpfeiffer 19m19 minutes ago

Think about this:the Republicans on this committee are not any old members, they are a group of all stars handpicked for this job. Seriously
 

Aaron

Member
Dan Pfeiffer ‏@danpfeiffer 19m19 minutes ago

Think about this:the Republicans on this committee are not any old members, they are a group of all stars handpicked for this job. Seriously
When you're elected on faith, who needs qualifications or intelligence?
 
"My impression is you don't want Secretaries of State making their own decisions but instead want them to be completely deferential to particular experts who do not have the authority/responsibility to make the ultimate decisions?"

"Yes, exactly, leaders lead".

"Isn't that the opposite of what I just described?"
 

Mecha

Member
He's cross-examining Hillary Clinton as if she were a witness in a trial, where the standard tactic to only ask questions where a witness can respond yes/no, except this Congressional hearing doesn't have the strict rules applied to cross-examination where a witness asked a yes/no question must, in fact, answer yes/no.

The tactic is make him appear like a no-nonsense straight shooter, and have Hillary give longer answers to appear like she's dodging a "simple" question. Content doesn't matter.

I understand why he's doing it, but boy is it annoying for those that don't fall for the tactic.
 
Dan Pfeiffer ‏@danpfeiffer 19m19 minutes ago

Think about this:the Republicans on this committee are not any old members, they are a group of all stars handpicked for this job. Seriously

18y443m1eu939gif.gif
 
I don't even like Hillary and I got sick of this shit 2 years ago. Watch, they will have another one of these next fall right before election.
 

Matt_

World's #1 One Direction Fan: Everyone else in the room can see it, everyone else but you~~~
Duckworth is by far the best person on this committee of both sides
 

Angry Grimace

Two cannibals are eating a clown. One turns to the other and says "does something taste funny to you?"
His yes or no questions are pathetic. Did he really think she would go down this list of questions without ever elaborating?

Of course not, its a tactic to make a witness seem dishonest.
 
Screw Duckworth and her important questions about federal contracts that can jeapordize our national security. Did Sid Blumenthal kill Benghazi or not???
 
Why are they not questioning the people Clinton delegated the security matters to?

She said she had security professionals handle embassy security issues.

So, why are they not questioning them? Are they not the ones who actually failed here?

Have they ever been questioned?
 
I agree with her politically, but this lobbing Clinton prime time debate questions is just as much non-sense and timewastery as Gowdy's grotesque bullying.

Probably. But I'm willing to bet that the people throwing her prime time debate questions would be perfectly happy to stop wasting everyone's time and not have the hearing altogether.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom