• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Fallout 4 Spoiler Thread (Stay away if you hate spoilers)

Can't believe I had a huge part of the ending
(that your son is the final boss/part of the ending?)
spoiled for me by looking at a Fallout related hashtag on Twitter...

At least nothing else has been spoiled for me...
 
The worst part about the ending is that a lot of people were predicting your kid would be involved someway, but no one could've predicted how fucking silly it would actually be. (Assuming it's true)
 
sZIy4Cc.jpg

frHMtK6.jpg

Robot and ghoul romance confirmed. BioWare intensifies.
 
Eh, Twilight Zone had some episodes dealing with Robots. One of the more memorable ones, is where a man has to take place of his own robot(Who's very humanoid) in a boxing match where robots are used as boxers. He gets beat up and hurt really badly. The short story this episode was based on was published in 1956.

They also pronounced robots funny. Something like 'Robits'.

The term "robit" is the Czech word for "work;" the word "robot" was adapted from that by the writer Karel Čapek in R.U.R.
 
The graphics are concerning, the quest numbers are concerning, the launch day review embargo is concerning, the launch state of the game is concerning (given history). This game has more worrying dot points than Battlefront =/

Dude I've waited so long for this game, I don't know how I could take it if it turned out to be bad.
 
I look forward to introducing Shaun to his new step-mother, Curie. You see, she's handy, son, if-ya-know-what-I-mean.

I'm surprised Shaun knows who the protagonist is, too. I'm still baffled we don't get to spend a bit of time interacting with him in the prologue to create some kind of emotional connection. (Also, all I can think of with Kellogg is Kellogg's Corn Flakes, I'm so sorry.)
 
Oh my, it is terrible. And MacCready? Really? Looks like Bethesda wants it's own Harold. Still pissed about their treatment of the original one
 
Lol, this sounds really terrible indeed. But then this is Bethesda we're talking about. Still, it's a shame to see that their writing skills haven't improved even one bit over the past 10 years.

The real shame however is that, for the second time, they're inflicting their shitty and illogical writing on a series originally designed to be the exact opposite (i.e. one that presents a cohesive, inherently logical and thus believable setting and using it to tell equally believable and coherent stories). I mean, I couldn't care less about what they do with their own series, but it's a shame to see them pulling this kind of crap with the Fallout setting.
 
So, son being the villain is a real spoiler? And you have to either kill him or nuke some place in the final quest?

It has all the ingredients for a stupid, stupid ending, kinda hoping it ends up being one. I mean, at least it'd be very entertaining that way.
 
So you guys are saying the ending sucks without any basis or context whatsoever?

How much of a context you need, before a choice "Nuke Boston with hundreds of people" - "Kill someone who isn't even your biological or just logical son" makes sense?
 
How much of a context you need, before a choice "Nuke Boston with hundreds of people" - "Kill someone who isn't even your biological or just logical son" makes sense?

For all the touting of the real time dialogue and how you can shoot anyone anytime you want, I don't really get why this decision is something you do through dialogue.

Like what if I want do both?
 
Oh boy, The Chivalrous Order Of The Knights Of Steel are back in again, along with super orcs.

I can't wait to use my Fuse-Rodinator shockwave cannon to shoot down Enclave VTOL gunships armed only with front-mounted flamethrowers.
 
Honestly, I can deal with a shitty story, but the conversation system and the removal of skills , and to a certain degree; the graphics has seriously crushed my enthusiasm for this game.

EDIT: And the apparent reduction of speech checks kinda ruins my prefered playstyle anyways.
 
Just stay positive, people. If nothing else, we can all at least enjoy Fallout 4's story on the "relentless ridicule" level.

Perhaps skilled Photoshop artists will insert Skyrim quotes into Fallout 4 screenshots as fake subtitles and then we can all play the game of "Guess which of these lines of dialogue are real", though lamentably there are no winners.

"Blessings of the Eight Divines be upon you, champion." -Brotherhood of Steel Initiate, Fallout 4
 
Just stay positive, people. If nothing else, we can all at least enjoy Fallout 4's story on the "relentless ridicule" level.

Perhaps skilled Photoshop artists will insert Skyrim quotes into Fallout 4 screenshots as fake subtitles and then we can all play the game of "Guess which of these lines of dialogue are real", though lamentably there are no winners.

"Blessings of the Eight Divines be upon you, champion." -Brotherhood of Steel Initiate, Fallout 4

The lack of full dialogue options makes it harder to screenshot.
 
I entered this thread
Decided to stick around

What the fuck Bethesda. Quality writing

I've gone through this thread and...
where is all this terrible dialogue people keep complaining about?

Or are we just expecting shit based on the plot points being revealed here,
because this thread seems to be a gathering ground for modern Fallout haters.
 
This one's especially weird, as Todd Howard has been adamant for years that Tactics is tossed from the canon.



If BGS gave a shit about time passed in a logical sense Fallout 3 wouldn't have looked like the bombs dropped six months ago.

I don't think it's uncharitable, given the setting and story of FO3, that the time skip literally exists only to separate FO3 from anything that happened in FO2.
Black Isle never considered Tactics canon, but major events from FOT are part of Bethesda canon and even referenced in FO3.
They also incorporated some BOS lore from that as well. Even the BOS as a whole was meant to be a West Coast thing.
 
Robot and ghoul romance confirmed. BioWare intensifies.

A companion that's a robot but also -quite preposterously - has a French accent!? Another one who 'enjoys disguises'? It's like they've recreated real, actual, human personalities into the game.
 
Yeah, Tactics busts through a lot of what was established and shouldn't be considered the same universe as 1 and 2. But Todd Howard made it clear that it wasn't considered, even while using things from it and retconning far more than Tactics ever did... It's a weird situation. They might as well just say Tactics is canon at this point.
Honestly, I doubt they even care at this point.
A companion that's a robot but also -quite preposterously - has a French accent!? Another one who 'enjoys disguises'? It's like they've recreated real, actual, human personalities into the game.
I know, right? Some amazing character design. There's the Fiery Redhead™ thief that's a drug addict, the "hard-boiled" detective with a trench coat and fedora, the Intrepid Reporter with the flat cap and a scarf and the intellectual brute/beast.
 
Lol. I'm so glad I didn't get caught up in the hype for this one, Everything sounds like a turnoff. The plot is dumb, with an even dumber plot twist. Plot twists are a lame crutch too, just make a fun engaging story. Your writing doesn't have to be the best and in a series like Fallout it's more about the journey itself I feel and the various characters you meet on your quest.

Then there's the fact that every single character looks like WaxCostanza.jpg.

I swear to god if Fallout 4 ends up with more GOTY nominations than Witcher 3 I'm... gonna laugh at the stupidity on display.
 
Why do the "intellectual brute" trope and still ave him go by a singular adjective? I just don't get it.

"You know what's funny? The most funny thing? In a character?"

- What?

"When you expect them to be one thing and then they're not actually that thing. You follow?"

- Sure

"So imagine you have this robot, right? And how do you expect a robot to talk?"

- Well, i suppose they'd have problems with human communication and

"Bleeps and bloops, right? Bleep bloop, destroy the human! 0s and 1s!"

- Maybe in 1965 yeah

"But instead of that, they're all excusez-moi, monsieur I 'ave 'eard you do not like newspapers. Classic. Or imagine some big guy, yeah? Now imagine instead of being dumb - because he's big - he's actually really intellectual. Like, British? Remember the bit about the French accent? Foreign people are funny. They're just...funny"
 
Top Bottom