Chinner said:not going to explain a basic sentence. look at the context if you're really struggling.
well you got the "basic" part right at least.
Chinner said:not going to explain a basic sentence. look at the context if you're really struggling.
mckmas8808 said:Why say this? It's so stupid to say when IronMan and TDK proves that the superhero flick still has alot of room left.
Dabookerman said:More Sci Fi means more Star Wars. This is a good thing.
gdt5016 said:...
That is NOT a good thing.
Solo said:Because all the major superheroes have now had movies and/or reboots now. There really is nowhere to go now but into an endless stream of sequels. I agree that the genre's popularity has finally peaked (probably last summer with IM and TDK) and things are likely to start sliding the other way now.
And if that (plus the success of Avatar, D9 and ST, obviously) helps bring sci-fi back in a major way, then Im all for it.
Dabookerman said:More Sci Fi means more Star Wars. This is a good thing.
AniHawk said:Star Wars OT 3D is this decade. Count on it.
Solo said:Star Wars could be awesome once Lucas is dead and his kids inevitably let someone else take over.
gdt5016 said:...
That is NOT a good thing.
GhaleonEB said:Sunday actuals were a touch better than forecast, but not much.
Weekend estimate: $68.3m (-10%)
Weekend actual: $68.5m (-9.4%)
http://twitter.com/giteshpandya
Officially shatters the best 3rd weekend record (Spiderman with $45m).
:lol So true.Solo said:Star Wars could be awesome once Lucas is dead and his kids inevitably let someone else take over.
Did he already say that he will be re-updating the shit again. I fully expect it. Should be another easy 150million+ each worldwide for the original 3.AniHawk said:Star Wars OT 3D is this decade. Count on it.
Dabookerman said:I'm hoping he updates the original trilogy with more great CG dance numbers. I must say, the singing scene with the alien with the big lips, vastly improved what was an otherwise poor end to the saga.
the rumor is he isn't gonna direct the new trilogy. I hope its true. Hell he could let the guys who did the CG trailer for the MMO give it a go and it will probably still end up better than the prequelsWrath2X said::lol So true.
The thing is I'm about 95% sure we'll see another trilogy, it will be as shit as the prequel trilogy. Even though I enjoyed Revenge of The Sith it wasn't near the quality of the original trilogy and I'm convinced that is as good as it gets.
I would love to see Genndy Tartakovsky though.
Is there more to this rumor?CassidyIzABeast said:the rumor is he isn't gonna direct the new trilogy. I hope its true. Hell he could let the guys who did the CG trailer for the MMO give it a go and it will probably still end up better than the prequels
other than Spielberg and Coppola being mentioned as directing, nothing elseWrath2X said:Is there more to this rumor?
OK this rumor is bullshit :lolCassidyIzABeast said:other than Spielberg and Coppola being mentioned as directing, nothing else
Wrath2X said:OK this rumor is bullshit :lol
Spielberg has way too many projects to can just for Star Wars, and Coppola has been into independent films for a while now. Spielberg or Coppola, yeah fucking right. :lol
canova said:wow it's Cameron's dick-sucking thread.
If Avatar surpasses TDK in domestic gross, I will retire from movie-watching
Count of Monte Sawed-Off said:No way Coppola does a Star Wars. He's way into making tiny personal movies that no one sees (not an insult) that he can pretty much fund himself. He's doing things the way he wants to and at this stage in his life I doubt he'd want to alter things.
Tim the Wiz said:He's got nothing to prove, and familiarity can breed contempt, so a fun change of scenery with a Star Wars side-trip could be an option. It's definitely unlikely, but again, not entirely implausible. I could see a certain chain of events and a love bomb on Lucas's part pushing him over the edge to do it.
Prine said:The only films i've seen from Coppola is GF 1&2. Is he still capable of making good movies? Spielberg i will never doubt but Copalla has been slipping for some time now (from people I speak to)
StoOgE said:go rent Apocolypse Now (not Redux), The Outsiders, Rumblefish, and Bram Strokers Dracula.
They are all good.
Godfather 3 is sort of okish... if it weren't a sequel to two of the best films of all time it might have even been pretty good. It just fails miserably in the face of two of the greatest films of all time. Also, his daughter is a good writer/director but cannot act to save her life.
He then made Jack staring Robin Williams which might be the worst movie I've ever seen. Ever since then he has gone stupid.
StoOgE said:go rent Apocolypse Now (not Redux), The Outsiders, Rumblefish, and Bram Strokers Dracula.
They are all good.
Godfather 3 is sort of okish... if it weren't a sequel to two of the best films of all time it might have even been pretty good. It just fails miserably in the face of two of the greatest films of all time. Also, his daughter is a good writer/director but cannot act to save her life.
He then made Jack staring Robin Williams which might be the worst movie I've ever seen. Ever since then he has gone stupid.
StoOgE said:go rent Apocolypse Now (not Redux), The Outsiders, Rumblefish, and Bram Strokers Dracula.
They are all good.
Godfather 3 is sort of okish... if it weren't a sequel to two of the best films of all time it might have even been pretty good. It just fails miserably in the face of two of the greatest films of all time. Also, his daughter is a good writer/director but cannot act to save her life.
He then made Jack staring Robin Williams which might be the worst movie I've ever seen. Ever since then he has gone stupid.
The reason Spielberg found time for Indy 4 is because he is the co-creator and the director of the trilogy.Tim the Wiz said:Spielberg found time for Indy 4 when Lucas said it was time (to ruin yet another dearly-beloved franchise). And Coppola is an old friend. So, it's not completely implausible.
BOXOFFICEMOJO said:1 AVATAR $8,094,554/$360,209,452
2 SHERLOCK HOLMES $2,911,461/$141,626,898
3 ALVIN AND THE CHIPMUNKS: THE SQUEAKQUEL $2,217,825/$158,134,760
I agree. And with a live action Star Wars on the way, I can't really see a new trilogy being made. They're focusing on the TV side of Star Wars now.Wrath2X said:OK this rumor is bullshit :lol
Spielberg has way too many projects to can just for Star Wars, and Coppola has been into independent films for a while now. Spielberg or Coppola, yeah fucking right. :lol
Which will be horrible :lolShalashaska said:I agree. And with a live action Star Wars on the way, I can't really see a new trilogy being made. They're focusing on the TV side of Star Wars now.
Tuesday:gamergirly said:Monday's numbers:
Avatar up to $360 million now
Avatar $7.3M TUE, -10% from MON, $367.5M in 19 days. Could hit $420M SUN passing Spider-Man for #8 alltime domestic.
Shalashaska said:I agree. And with a live action Star Wars on the way, I can't really see a new trilogy being made. They're focusing on the TV side of Star Wars now.
GhaleonEB said:Tuesday:
http://twitter.com/giteshpandya
Would also make it the #1 movie from 2009 ahead of you know what. Today's gross puts it at #3 WW; it will be #2 at the end of the day tomorrow.
DanielPlainview said:My friend thinks Book of Eli will beat Avatar, but I don't know. No Denzel film has ever openened higher than $23M, except Inside Man ($28) and American Gangster ($48)
mckmas8808 said:So is a 10% drop for Tuesday good or bad?
They're starting to trickle in. Alvin 2 dropped 30% yesterday, still waiting on Sherlock; Avatar seems to be tracking ~20% better than the overall market pretty consistantly.Somnia said:Good. Return of the King dropped 9.5% or so on its first non-holiday Tuesday, but this movie is also up on it $$ wise. Other movies appeared to have dropped 25-35% on Tuesday, but Avatar only dropped 10%.
edit: Beaten by your edit :lol Sherlocks Tuesday hasn't come out yet, but I'll post when I see it.
GhaleonEB said:They're starting to trickle in. Alvin 2 dropped 30% yesterday, still waiting on Sherlock; Avatar seems to be tracking ~20% better than the overall market pretty consistantly.
http://www.boxofficemojo.com/daily/chart/?sortdate=2010-01-05&p=.htm
Same. I'll toss in the occasional prediction (and have). I follow the box office overall pretty closely but not enough to really get into it with them over most movies.Somnia said:Just noticed you're on BOM also. I finally made an account. Though I doubt I'll post too much on there other than the prediction threads.