Inflation, how does it work?
http://www.usinflationcalculator.com
(Hint: games cost less now than they did 10 years ago, adjusting for inflation)
"Not at this scale."
(Hint: Nobody walks in to the store thinking, "Well, in
2006 dollars
")
I was asking about Ps4 sales, that's why I brought up zhuge. And speaking up zhuge, hit him up for that graph of yours. Maybe tweet.
We'd all been discussing what the Bone was at, and you popped up and said, "9M in Oct, right?" We assumed you were participating in the active conversation since you didn't really say otherwise, hence our confusion.
Interesting. I'll admit though I'm still not sure what you mean by xbone's overhead and multi-os architecture. Either way though perhaps it would be foolish to just say xbone has any difference making hardware advantages now.
First, I should say that I misread you and thought you were asking about the CPU, so everything I said actually applies to that.

I was actually thinking the 53MHz wasn't right for the CPU, but thought, "Well, I guess the relevant point is that it didn't matter." ><
I've heard varying answers from different sources. Like here on GAF I've been told that Ps4's gpu and ram are in just another league than xbone's and other times I hear that te difference in power, just isn't really much of a difference.
I think Psn still sucking is a major complaint too.
This is it in a nutshell.
The CPUs themselves are effectively identical. The Bone's is clocked a bit higher which should give it a clear, if small advantage, but see above. The "multi-OS stuff" is in reference to the fact that Bone runs an XBox OS as a virtual machine, but it's also running Windows in another VM, and there's a third OS that makes all of that happen. That creates a lot of overhead on the system that makes it less performant than PS4, even at a slightly higher clock.
While the Bone's GPU is clocked a bit higher resulting in it edging out the PS4 in some very specific benchmarks, the PS4's GPU pretty much completely outclasses it in every meaningful metric thanks to the additional compute units and ROPs. In theory, you could design a game that ran better on the Bone, but that would need to be the primary design goal of the game, overriding all other normal considerations.
Speaking of primary design goals, Microsoft's insistence that the Bone run Windows is the cause of all of it's shortcomings as a gaming device. Not only does that stuff trod directly on gaming as described above, the considerable memory requirements of Windows dictated the use of the DDR4 RAM instead of the much faster GDDR5 "required" by the system's APU. Because they were forced to use low performance RAM to ensure there was enough available for Windows to boot, they aren't able to properly feed the system's GPU, and they had to add a large data cache to the APU itself to mitigate
some of the performance issues that caused. Problem was, the APU was already filled with the CPU and GPU, so the only way to make room for the cache was to hack out a third of the GPU's compute units, which is why it's so outclassed by Sony's GPU.
While MS engineers were trying to figure out how to make their new Windows box not quite so shitty at gaming, Sony engineers were customizing PS4's architecture to further improve it's GPGPU capabilities, effectively giving their developers more hardware tools rather than more hardware restrictions.
I guess for my own sanity, are you just playing difficult or are these genuine questions?
Because you are coming off as a true hard core Xbox loyalist, who do everything to refuse facts.
To be fair to Art, there's a lot of conflicting and simply wrong information out there, and it's hard to know whom to listen to, especially when so-called industry experts often talk out of their ass.
There's a bit of that on both sides of the fence. There are plenty of people who believe Microsoft is lying about their own sell-through numbers when they announce them as well.
Then again, there's also people who believe the moon landing was faked, 9/11 was staged by the US government, and the Holocaust never happened.
Takes all kinds.
Apparently Marshall Faulk is one of those people.
Everybody eats rice. He needs to be more specific.
Eww. Not me.
There is no evidence for that. Simple proof that it happened: They communicated with the astronauts in real time (minus the delay caused by the speed of light) using radio, which had to come from the moon (pretty easy to pinpoint). The Soviets obviously tuned in, too, and given their status as arch enemies they would have pointed out if the source of the transmissions was terrestrial.
Can't we just look up there and see all the crap we left laying around?
He must mean only people who eat rice steamed with water.
You know, not people who eat their rice with butter, because all white people eat rice with butter amirite?
Nope, not even with butter.
I think xbone is dope although I've contemplated getting one I've never owned an xbox. I don't see how this makes me a loyalist.
If you mean it's something designed to make your victims more compliant, then I agree, but since I suspect that's not what you mean, can I ask what you think is "dope" about stuff like forced parity and businesses who prioritize things like "expanding the hegemony" ahead of considerations such as the device's primary function?