Can the Xbox become the iPhone?

No.


Maybe if it's games were as quick and easy to make like and iPhone, and if Apple managed, marketed, and manufacturer it.
Basically it would need a better brand, and the trust of the public, and not just American gamers.
iPhones don't sell to the same niche every year.

If Microsoft decides to go down iterative upgrade path, Sony is in a precarious position. Do they join Microsoft or do they cede the performance game to their competitor? Developers will have a large say in their decision. If programmers are using engines that scale easily across a diverse chipset games will look noticeably better on Xbox machines. This will be enough to impact the narrative around the two machines and if the chatter gets too loud Sony may buckle.

It's so cool that not only can we predict the future of a hypothetical Xbox, but also the details of pressures Sony would face in response to the hypothetical success of a hypothetical Xbox upgrade.

So, no.
But maybe it can be the next PlayStation.
 
im just wondering if they're in a hurry to win the dick waving contest after taking the 1080 piss this gen. curious if it'll pay off, i think the avid fans will pick up the new system and almost nobody else will. not to mention splitting your audience and dev work.
 
What would the point of the Xbox be if they give it incremental upgrades and have games running at varying performance levels? Why would anyone choose that over a PC you can build at your budget and liking? Are they gonna give Xbox exclusives that they'll keep away from PC? Is it just the convenience of having it ready outta the box? It really feels like it'll be a redundant product.

Consoles are normally pretty set, without having to worry about such things.
 
It can but only if they do something about its price. Most people dont pay their iphones 799$. They get a plan and and pay it maybe 150-200$ when they come out. Eventually you can get it for 0$ with plan.

To have to dish out 500-600$ every year id have a problem with.
 
I'm sorry - suffer in what way? Year 3 is typically when we see the fruits of developers gaining mastery over writing specialized code towards a particular piece of hardware. In fact, games tend to look better & better on consoles as years go by. Will there be drawbacks? Absolutely. But part of the benefit of writing code towards a fixed box for a long period of time is seeing how much power you can truly wring out of it.

This.
 
What?
This would work exactly like it does on PC, you can play one game on a variety of setups.
The only issue to this is developers would need extra time and budget to optimize, like they do on PC. If Microsoft helps them or incentivizes them to do it, then all's well.

PC ports, always good arent they?
 
You know what one of the arguments I always use when people start campaining for low prices over specs is that we have yearly phone upgrades and many people do it.

You see how in phones they inlcude the latest technology. I feel if console gaming goes this way it can catch up with PC gaming which would only help both PC and console gaming and all of us.


Maybe not yearly with consoles. Last gen lasted about 10 years which was the longest one to date. So a good top of the line upgrade every 3 years would be good. Technology evolves fast enough that we should have this and it would be good.

That is part of why I saw the MS vision being good, but people seem to hate it. It is one of the things I hate about the gaming community. They can sometimes be so freaking cheap in supporting the hobby they love. The want the best stuff and the cheapest price. Oh well hopefully people can see the good in it more so than only the bad stuff.
 
PC ports, always good arent they?

games actually written for PC are very reliable.

games lazily ported to PC as an after-thought? still not terrible.

this would be the equivalent of a closed-box PC-like environment - if the hardware is iterative with incremental improvements [similar to iPhone upgrades, as an example, as per this thread], there's all sorts of potential.

i'd totally buy the upgrades, but i'm already an avid PC gamer and love upgrading. ;p


You know what one of the arguments I always use when people start campaining for low prices over specs is that we have yearly phone upgrades and many people do it.

You see how in phones they inlcude the latest technology. I feel if console gaming goes this way it can catch up with PC gaming which would only help both PC and console gaming and all of us.


Maybe not yearly with consoles. Last gen lasted about 10 years which was the longest one to date. So a good top of the line upgrade every 3 years would be good. Technology evolves fast enough that we should have this and it would be good.

That is part of why I saw the MS vision being good, but people seem to hate it. It is one of the things I hate about the gaming community. They can sometimes be so freaking cheap in supporting the hobby they love. The want the best stuff and the cheapest price. Oh well hopefully people can see the good in it more so than only the bad stuff.

yup, every 3 years would be the sweet spot for most people methinks, although i'd be ready every two. ;)

also agree that the gaming community can be weirdly poisonous and spiteful [esp. w/ regards to consoles], not sure why we can't all want all three console companies to succeed - they all offer different things and one doesn't need to fail for the other to succeed.
 
People are used to buy phones every year or two due to heavy subsidisation and that the monthly cost is mentally written off as the costs for calls/texts/data etc. On top of that the phones are always with them and can get heavy day in / day out use leading to wear and tear over the life time usage.

Those aren't behaviours and mindsets that apply to consoles.

I could see MS pushing for Xbox branded hardware in terms of minimum spec PCs and laptops etc, but multiple consoles that they are expecting mass market to buy each year just doesn't seem like it would work to me. (Not on the scale they are hoping for anyway).
 
Built in obsolescence. After 1-2 years, your iPhone can't handle the latest OS, for which apps are optimized. So your phone runs like shit when trying to run something basic like your personal banking app. Not saying that people don't get upgrade fever, but they really hold your toes to the fire either way.
Funny, because some of my friends have old iPhones and they work quite well on newest iOS.

And the older phones slowing down is nothing new - the advancement in raw speed of the mobile SoCs are huge and you can't expect old ones to keep up.
 
the smartphone upgrade model isn't what it once was either. People just aren't going to spend the money if they don't need to.

I think if they updated it every 3-4 years instead of just making mini version that would be better
 
What would the point of the Xbox be if they give it incremental upgrades and have games running at varying performance levels? Why would anyone choose that over a PC you can build at your budget and liking? Are they gonna give Xbox exclusives that they'll keep away from PC? Is it just the convenience of having it ready outta the box? It really feels like it'll be a redundant product.

Consoles are normally pretty set, without having to worry about such things.

I think it could work if you tier the pricing. I.E $400, $200, $100 and iterate every 3 years or so. The top end would still be cheaper than most PCs and the other two significantly so.

If you got basically 5 years of compatibility out of each box, it might not be terrible. And there would always be a ton of old games to buy, since they are infinitely backwards compatible.

I think it could work, but would be quite difficult to manage with the developers. They'd need to be pretty strict on performance targets, and there would always be concerns that the new Xbox wasn't playing the games "better enough" or that performance on the old ones was complete trash.
 
I think my awful title (I swear it was placeholder!) has some confused. This isn't about the Xbox being as POPULAR as the iPhone—no console in history has approached the level of popularity of the iPhone—I'm simply questioning if they can adapt a similar iPhone/smartphone like release strategy and successfully create a closed marketplace.

It would essentially be a locked off steam machine...which when put that way sounds like a terrible idea! LOL.
 
yup, every 3 years would be the sweet spot for most people methinks, although i'd be ready every two. ;)

also agree that the gaming community can be weirdly poisonous and spiteful [esp. w/ regards to consoles], not sure why we can't all want all three console companies to succeed - they all offer different things and one doesn't need to fail for the other to succeed.

Not everyone can use logic to defend the hobby they like. they have to use favoritism and other crap.
 
that's their hope, obviously.

more iPad than iPhone, I'd imagine, but still.

The annual (or nearly-annual) release is what Microsoft is doing with their Surface - another piece of consumer electronic hardware. And that has been reasonably successful.

So it makes sense that they'd try to push the Xbox in that direction.
And I would buy a new Xbox every two years without hesitation - assuming it did more than simply up the native resolution of AAA titles.
 
A phone is a necessity for most people. An Xbox is not.

Microsoft is delusional if they think they can pump out updates every year (or every other year), and not hurt their business from oversaturation.
 
I think my awful title (I swear it was placeholder!) has some confused. This isn't about the Xbox being as POPULAR as the iPhone—no console in history has approached the level of popularity of the iPhone—I'm simply questioning if they can adapt a similar iPhone/smartphone like release strategy and successfully create a closed marketplace.

It would essentially be a locked off steam machine...which when put that way sounds like a terrible idea! LOL.

We shall see. Although in general yeah I think they could. But not every year. Not every 2 years even. Maybe 3 or 4. Whenever they feel tech has gotten better to justify it. However they need the mind share that this isnt a whole new Xbox. MS would need to communicate with the masses that this is just an upgrade to whats already out there right now, just faster. Similar to the iphone 6-6s. Your apps and games will all still be there on the system and run much faster and maybe they system will have better hardware features.
 
We shall see. Although in general yeah I think they could. But not every year. Not every 2 years even. Maybe 3 or 4. Whenever they feel tech has gotten better to justify it. However they need the mind share that this isnt a whole new Xbox. MS would need to communicate with the masses that this is just an upgrade to whats already out there right now, just faster. Similar to the iphone 6-6s. Your apps and games will all still be there on the system and run much faster and maybe they system will have better hardware features.

Like instead of expecting the "Slim" edition, you're getting a better performing edition.
 
I thought, and I may be wrong, but aren't we hitting the laws of physics on how much we can cheaply improve the CPUs and GPUs used in home console without the systems costing $600 and above.
 
I expect MS to eventually let third party manufacturers make their W10 Xboxes under certain especifications and centralized marketing.
Also I expect the game console model to eventually turn into W10, Android and iOS consoles, and Nintendo. Sony will provide games via PSnow.

Streaming games as the main source of delivery is a LONG ways off. Can't imagine how bad that would suck for multiplayer games.
 
hmmm, no.

The whole point of the console was that you make 1 purchase and then have the damn thing for at least 5 years.
 
hmmm, no.

The whole point of the console was that you make 1 purchase and then have the damn thing for at least 5 years.

And you can keep it. Except at year 3 you have a choice to buy an upgraded model. Basically the same as buying the slim after 2-3 years.
 
The culture around buying a new Apple product is much different from Xbox.

I think most people see a smartphone (the majority of Apple's sales) as an integral part of their life (work, leisure) that needs to be up-to-date, while an Xbox is a console that is supposed to last for 5+ years.

To say it a different way, Apple has conditioned its customers to prepare for a new device every year, whereas Microsoft has only released a new Xbox every 5-8 years.

So Microsoft could try releasing a new console every two years or whatever, but the average person probably won't find that acceptable.

I think for a frequent-release plan to do well would require Microsoft to not use the Xbox name, since people associate Xbox with a more traditional every-five-years type of console.
 
Also Arm performance growth is much faster, mobile gain 40-50% boost every year, therefor yearly upgrade make sense.
 
Not a chance.
Unlike Apple, xbox
- has no worldwide appeal
- has no QOL value outside of games
- is not an entry point into your social life
- is not portable/ always with you
- therefore isn't seen as a status symbol
- and thus isn't fashionable

Xbox has none of the factors that drives apple's popularity. Outside of a bunch of hardcore gamers, who'se gonna care about upgradeable hardware thats not pc? Seriously.
 
Not everyone can use logic to defend the hobby they like. they have to use favoritism and other crap.

The irony.
If you'd actually use a shred of logic yourself, you'd see your entire post and theory fall apart because Xbox simply isn't in any position to wield that kind of consumer interest. It's a flawed way of reasoning, filled with what-ifs and wishful thinking. Logic really never entered the equation.
 
Top Bottom