Zombie James
Banned
Ugh, not a fan of the idea of tighter release cycles for consoles. Really not. There's nothing wrong with the standard 4-5 year cycle.
No I cant. Its 2016 and tech moves far too fast now days. If you don't want to buy an upgraded console don't do it, but there's no reason the rest who want one should have to wait
Boss★Moogle;198609063 said:I always figured that this was going to be the way of things once they switched to x86. More frequent hardware releases (like Apple) with backward and forward compatibility within the new "PlaySation ecosystem".
I've even thought to myself that maybe current PS4 games have hidden graphical options similar to PC graphical options, that can switch to higher settings if they detect better hardware.
For me to get on board though there needs to be an option for 1080p/60fps as an alternative to 4K.
For every console you don't upgrade, I'll upgrade twice!
Geez, some people need to calm down.
Iterative hardware is going on in every other part of the tech industry. Why should game consoles be any different?
New GPUs get released all the time, new phone and tablet models come out every year. Microsoft and Sony hint at releasing more powerful versions on their consoles and people lose their shit...
Get used to it, because its going to be the new normal.
We're heading towards the end of third year already, when would this even release? 4th? Might as well wait a little longer and release a PS5 at that point with full backwards compatibility.
Ugh, this will push me to stop buying consoles and just go full PC as half my gaming is already on PC as is.
Honest question, when's the last time Kotaku has been wrong about a hardware rumor?
Uh. Isn't 4K called 4K because it has 4 times the amount of pixels as 1080p, not twice.
I want a $400-$500 PS4.5 that plays games at 4K.
Give it two HDMI ports like a 4K blue ray so that I can output sound to my reciever.
Uh. Isn't 4K called 4K because it has 4 times the amount of pixels as 1080p, not twice.
AAA games running in 4K for a console price? I don't think so.
Yeah because 50 dollars a year breaks the bank when we pay 60 for just one game...
sony looking at how to waste all their profits again
Why ?
Because alot of us have already paid 400$/400€ to play and a bit over two years and we have to upgrade because they failed to properly plan their console ?
Plus I can hardly see how that would work properly, but unless we have a solid concept to see how it would work, it's hard to judge.
Why ?
Because alot of us have already paid 400$/400 to play and a bit over two years and we have to upgrade because they failed to properly plan their console ?
Plus I can hardly see how that would work properly, but unless we have a solid concept to see how it would work, it's hard to judge.
Honest question, when's the last time Kotaku has been wrong about a hardware rumor?
Ugh, not a fan of the idea of tighter release cycles for consoles. Really not. There's nothing wrong with the standard 4-5 year cycle.
Sounds like bullshit to me. Especially since Sony has been pushing the concept of every PS4 being the same as a major selling point to developers for PSVR at GDC
![]()
To be fair, the PS4 launched at $399.
Guys the minimum requirements for games are gonna be the current ps4 specs...
Sony isnt THAT stupid. My guess you'll just have gfx options, or it detects the more powerful ps4 it'll automatically max out the gfx options
Ugh, not a fan of the idea of tighter release cycles for consoles. Really not. There's nothing wrong with the standard 4-5 year cycle.
The advantage of incremental upgrades is not hamstringing developers on outdated hardware, which was a huge problem last generation and having one architecture to follow for guaranteed B/C.
Consoles are becoming PCs, basically.
This process has been going since the original Xbox.
Maybe Crazy Ken is in charge again.
PS4k : 599 dollars
wow so i guess this is more or less confirmation that sony is leaving the console hardware business
will probably have 2,4 GHz WiFi.