Kotaku: Sony is working on a ‘PS4.5; briefing devs on plans for a more powerful PS4

I simply don't understand the point of this or how its even possible. 1080p => 4k is a HUUUUUGE upgrade, that doesn't seem like a half console step to me. Most TVs also don't even support 4k yet, its a huge luxury device at this point in time. And I can't imagine theres anyway you hit 4k on a $400 console right now even keeping all the existing poly counts and fx the same. There has to be some crazy trickery for this to work out.

Exactly. Modern AAA at 4K chews up Titan X's and spits them out. Without Sony actually using something that has substantially better performance/watt and doubles the thermal envelope (LOL)- this all seems more like a joke on the internet than an actual reality.
 
If I have to spend 4-5 hundred to upgrade my console every two years, I'm just gonna go back to PC gaming.

But you don't have to. Just like people don't have to upgrade their video card every time a new line launches. It's also presumptuous to think updates will happen with that type of regularity.
 
Exactly. Modern AAA at 4K chews up Titan X's and spits them out. Without Sony actually using something that has substantially better performance/watt and doubles the thermal envelope (LOL)- this all seems more like a joke on the internet than an actual reality.

Nobody said you'd be playing uncharted 4 at 4K. Time to retire the bird
 
I love how some people are thinking this will suddenly bring the games we play today on PS4 and in the future hit 60 fps at 1080p or even 4K. We barely get games at a solid 30fps now and an incremental hardware upgrade isn't suddenly going to out perform a high end PC. I expect a slight upgrade to specs and conveince, PSVR stuff bundled in the system for example.

Also I remember for the longest time Patrick being bitter that during the whole Microsoft DRM reveal and months leading up to E3 he constantly was of the viewpoint of just wait Sony is going to do the same thing because publishers are calling the shots this time. He had sources than and he got it wrong even saying afterwards he was still hearing chatter of that happening and Sony must have ditched that plan last minute. Perhaps his Sony sources aren't as strong? Maybe this is in such early talks that it still has the possibility of never coming out? Jeff Gertsmann of Giant Bomb has said in the past he was hearing some pretty strong rumblings of Microsoft doing this with the 360 and that never came about so this could be a similar case.
 
Heh.

You guys. You REALLY think Sony is gonna release a brand new 399.99 machine this fall to compete with PSVR? Ive got some sweet-ass waterfront property in the Gobi desert you'll love.

You guys are just eating this right up.

PSVR's worst nightmare is Sony releasing an entirely new console in the same time frame of its launch.
 
Not this fall. Next fall. This fall is too soon and will kill their brand in ways you wouldn't believe. PS4s on fire off the shoulder of Orion. We'll watch PSVR glitter in the dark near the Tannhäuser Gate. All those E3 moments will be lost in time, like salty tears...in...rain. Time to die.

Nah. 2018.
 
4K my ass. This is most likely a revision with 4K scaler tech in built. Sony is on fire, why on earth would they budge for anything at this rate.
 
If Microsoft does it, Sony will be forced to do it.

No one can compete in the market if the other changes the rules.

Who's gonna lose in all this? Just the customers. So not only we have 2-years planned obsolescence cycle on PC, but maybe now on consoles too.
 
A source* tells me that it will be named the PS4 Vita.

Vita means life, after all. 4K means life after 1080p.

It's beginning to all make sense.
 
I JUST bought a PS4. I really hope this isn't true.

why did you wait this long?

this product isnt for you. its for early adopters who care for the latest and greatest in tech.

if you really care about this then just return your PS4. pay the 15% restocking fee and wait for the latest model.
 
Remember guys, these rumors aren't new. Sony has been dying for PS4 to support 4K. Here's an article from February 2013, right when the console was announced.

http://www.theverge.com/2013/2/28/4...ll-work-with-ps4-require-100gb-plus-downloads

Sony is still being secretive about its forthcoming "world's first" 4K movie download service, but it sounds like it will eventually work with the equally-mysterious PS4. That's the word according to Sony Electronics President and COO Phil Molyneux, who said "I promise you will not be disappointed" when asked if the service would support his company's new console. That certainly makes sense, and it lines up with previous reports that the PS4 would support 4K photos and video, but not games.
 
I love how some people are thinking this will suddenly bring the games we play today on PS4 and in the future hit 60 fps at 1080p or even 4K. We barely get games at a solid 30fps now and an incremental hardware upgrade isn't suddenly going to out perform a high end PC. I expect a slight upgrade to specs and conveince, PSVR stuff bundled in the system for example.

.
It would just make existing games run at a more stable frame rate, future games would probably either look or run quite a bit better and some devs will probably go back and do updates to some games to be enhanced on the new hardware.
The PS4.5 (if real) will almost definitely be the strongest piece of hardware sony could release in 2017 for $400.
Basically a new console, but not in the traditional generation reset sense because all the games would still be compatible with the base PS4, at least for the first few years.
 
Would these things be the Zen we have been hearing about? Or polaris? I they havent been released yet and dont they need to manufacture these things before they start putting them in the plastic boxes?
 
That's such bullshit. The reason why there's more bugs is because they're building larger worlds, more systems, and generally making games more complex. With that comes exponentially more test cases and variation on how players can break the game.

Sure adding extra hardware will add to the complexity of testing, but you are so off the mark it's astounding. I can absolutely guarantee you that if someone released a game that was cartridge only in this day and age with the complexity that these games have, it would take 10 years for QA to get through all their tests and within 10 minutes of going out in the wild it would break and on top of that there would be hundreds of thousands of cards getting sent to the publisher getting flashed with the update.

So in other words you agree with me despite your rude response. How was I off the mark when this was the point. More and more complex games to test and yet more versions to test.
 
If Nintendo went with iterative hardware for the NX, it would be an interesting way to keep up with Sony and Microsoft power-wise. Again, it would be about providing console users with more options. Nintendo could theoretically have multiple options: one for people who just care about the handheld, one for people who want to play those games on a TV without spending too much money, and one for people who want the high-end AAA games. Perhaps big western publishers would only support the high-end model.

I personally don't think there's a high chance of that happening soon, but it's something to think about. Even if not soon, if Nintendo decides to iterate on the NX platform indefinitely, you could eventually get models powerful enough to run AAA games.

My thoughts exactly. I'd wager that it has to do with some not wanting to accept that their system they just bought already being outdated. I mean I can understand it to a degree but there comes a point where you just have to be happy with what you have. If you want to live on the bleeding edge you need to accept the speed it operates at and the costs associated.

Bam. This is what people using phones and PCs already figured out. If developers don't fuck this up, you don't HAVE to upgrade. Most PC gamers don't buy titans. Most phone users don't keep up with the very latest iPhones. Console users don't seem to have let go of the idea of consoles being the bleeding edge.

I wonder if this means PC games will have higher system requirements after PS4k (and XB1.5 if that's a thing).. devs are going to start targeting that higher spec right?

If all console manufacturers do this it'll be interesting to see the gap between consoles and PC shrink. However, I think PC developers will continue to target the most popular graphics cards. Right now that card is the 970 -- an upper mid-range card, and that's what you're seeing most AAA PC games target for recommended settings.

Resident Evil 4(k) remaster incoming.

If this goes how I think it will, what you'll see is the RE4 PS4 version come out later this year, then Capcom will simply release an update allowing it to run at 4K on the upgraded PS4. Maybe they'll release that update as paid DLC.
 
4K my ass. This is most likely a revision with 4K scaler tech in built. Sony is on fire, why on earth would they budge for anything at this rate.

Kotaku's article seems legit, couple of different sources, reporter talking with developers...

Sony is most likely developing a more powerful PS4, little doubt about it at this point, they clearly said visuals will be better.
It will support 4K but it could/ probably be the same case as PS3 supporting 1080P gaming.

Why would Sony do that? Why Rockstar released GTA5 on next gen? cause they can make ton of money on the same fan base, if it will make people like me spend another 400$ than yea, it's worthy for them.

Consoles are closer than ever to PC, R&D is probably very low for them.
 

Maybe you shouldn't use his simple statements with your speculation.
Your price is pure speculation.
Same goes for the 4K gaming stuff, could be simply just a "no" towards the mentioned "run slightly better".
You don't know, therefore this is baseless speculation.


Well... Reading some comments of GopherD on the "Microsoft unifying PC/XB1 platforms, Phil implies Xbox moving to incremental upgrades" thread it seems he was very critic of the incremental upgrade solutions advocated by Phil Spencer... I don't know...

http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=197211235&postcount=159

http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=197213698&postcount=336

His person opinion doesn't necessarly reflects the decisions made by his employeer.
However we should just wait until we know more actually.
 
So what happens when the PS5 comes out? Surely PS5 games wouldn't be backwards compatible with the 4.5. Are you willing to spend several hundred dollars for something that would be obsolete when the next generation starts in a few years?
 
This wouldn't mean games would stop releasing on PS4, the PS4.5 would play the exact same games, they'll just look or run better on the new hardware.

But that's a problem for a lot of people.

People want the best experience a platform has to offer. It's right to feel a little disappointed if you've just chucked 300 on a PS4 to find out a new, more powerful model is right around the corner (maybe) that could offer a better experience in games.
 
Top Bottom