Am I the only one who find it incredibly hilarious that the Japanese are freaking out over the fact that they can no longer see one virtual cartoon character's panties anymore?
Oh please this shit happens here too.
Am I the only one who find it incredibly hilarious that the Japanese are freaking out over the fact that they can no longer see one virtual cartoon character's panties anymore?
When gaijins win everyone loses.
Am I the only one who find it incredibly hilarious that the Japanese are freaking out over the fact that they can no longer see one virtual cartoon character's panties anymore?
Am I the only one who find it incredibly hilarious that the Japanese are freaking out over the fact that they can no longer see one virtual cartoon character's panties anymore?
Am I the only one who find it incredibly hilarious that the Japanese are freaking out over the fact that they can no longer see one virtual cartoon character's panties anymore?
I don't get this. Like, I don't see the big deal. It doesn't matter if she is 14 or 18 or a 1000 year old space dragon, those pics in the OP are what this hubbub is about?
1) there is barely a difference, if anything it looks like one butt cheek has a sort of shorts like design in the new version.
2) why does this matter? this isn't a game where panties and clothing are important, it's not a game where sexualisation is a thing. It's something you would see if you put the camer in a position to look up a virtual girls skirt.
3) You have the other witch woman in the weird clown spandax thing with alternating diamonds cut out so you can see her butt cheeks and that is staying in, you can still see butt flesh if you want
Am I the only one who find it incredibly hilarious that the Japanese are freaking out over the fact that they can no longer see one virtual cartoon character's panties anymore?
The larger spreading problem of designers responding to perceived market forces? If he didn't martyr about it we would call it exactly what it is, a design choice. It's only a problem if you genuinely believe they are losing the freedom to express themselves. I don't buy it. Where there's a market, it will ship. There is plenty of Hentai out there and pornhub exists despite complaints from those opposed. There are no shortage of panty shots in video games and I know Onechabra came out here. This is an invented problem.
I think they're more likely pissed about the fact that their version of the game was changed because of the west. People in the west would be pissed as well if western versions of games were changed based on the Asian markets.
Seems like you are overreacting. Its just some anonymously posted comments. Outright blaming 'western criticism' was incredibly stupid though.Am I the only one who find it incredibly hilarious that the Japanese are freaking out over the fact that they can no longer see one virtual cartoon character's panties anymore?
But those perceived market forces don't exist. They're changing the game to cater to a vocal minority that likely wouldn't buy the game anyway, at the expense of people who would.
The existence of hentai has nothing to do with anything, so i'm not sure why you brought that up.
I think the West was unanimously in favor of her head being changed. But did the developers listen? Nope.
Also, why wouldn't they just leave the skin in the Japanese version? There must be something more to the story.
The panties are still visible.Am I the only one who find it incredibly hilarious that the Japanese are freaking out over the fact that they can no longer see one virtual cartoon character's panties anymore?
IIRC, they got Papa Nier on 360.Makes me wonder how they would've reacted if they got Papa Nier instead of bishounen onii-chan Nier.
Am I the only one who find it incredibly hilarious that the Japanese are freaking out over the fact that they can no longer see one virtual cartoon character's panties anymore?
Makes me wonder how they would've reacted if they got Papa Nier instead of bishounen onii-chan Nier.
Am I the only one who find it incredibly hilarious that the Japanese are freaking out over the fact that they can no longer see one virtual cartoon character's panties anymore?
I think the West was unanimously in favor of her head being changed. But did the developers listen? Nope.Guessing they're scared it will happen to a lot more now or something? Not that I think anyone would have even nagged about the Potatohead's panties.
Maybe if we stir up enough of a gaijin ruckus, we can get them to change her head.
#nopotatohead4japan
Wonder Woman is an established design that people are familiar with, they're not too likely to turn on it like newer designs. It's not exactly the best example I would use.
The heavy censorship of changing a pair of panties to a slightly different pair of panties.They are mostly freaking out because a vocal minority of online whiners can ductate what can and cannot be seen in their own country, and they are right.
I'd like to see the mature reactions of westerners in a hypothetical scenario where a vocal minority in Japan dictated how heavily censored the violence in the Deadpool movie would be, in western movie theaters.
I'm sure westerners would rip their actual, hypothetical, and virtual panties in outrage.
Guessing they're scared it will happen to a lot more now or something? Not that I think anyone would have even nagged about the Potatohead's panties.
Maybe if we stir up enough of a gaijin ruckus, we can get them to change her head.
#nopotatohead4japan
I find it more hilarious that the company just threw us under the bus as the reason for the change when nobody would have even noticed in the first place. The change was made to a character who wasn't even really sexualized, and the panties looked like some regular panties a girl would wear. You wouldn't even really see them that often unless you were actually trying to get those upskirt shots. It's an odd change when you already have another character running around nearly naked.
True but there are definitely other examples that people can simply lookup. There are still debates over things like "boob armor" in the american geek community. I just find it hypocritical how the American geek community spawned issues like the Gamergate and yet they turn their nose up on foreign games and get outraged over things like panty shots in jrpg's.
I think the West was unanimously in favor of her head being changed. But did the developers listen? Nope.
Also, why wouldn't they just leave the skin in the Japanese version? There must be something more to the story.
Probably as hilariously immature as the reactions to this panty change.One the one hand: It's just a texture and shouldn't warrant such a huge outrage.
In the other hand: The "teenage-girl with skimpy outfit"-trope is something that occurs so often in Japanese media, that some might even refer to it as pop-culture.
So now you have a Japanese developer changing an aspect of a game sold in Japan because of the mismatch with the foreign culture.
Think about this: GTA games in Japan were often censored so that you cannot kick a person on the ground and civilians wouldn't drop money when killed. What would everybodies reaction be if Rockstar made that edit to every version of the game, just to adjust to Japan's market?
i sincerely doubt any normal westerner would've been like "i feel very attacked by these panties"
...I had to look at this one for like 30 seconds to realize what was different.
I find it more hilarious that the company just threw us under the bus as the reason for the change when nobody would have even noticed in the first place. The change was made to a character who wasn't even really sexualized, and the panties looked like some regular panties a girl would wear. You wouldn't even really see them that often unless you were actually trying to get those upskirt shots. It's an odd change when you already have another character running around nearly naked.
...I had to look at this one for like 30 seconds to realize what was different.
That said it's probably a lot weirder that the game contains scenes with her and the little girl bathing together.
In which again, I said I'm not sure what the point was because it doesn't solve anything.
This is not actually true.But eventually China's going to be a big enough market that "market forces" will force elements such as zombies and skeletons (banned by Chinese gov) out of our games.
I feel like there is this kind of self-satisfaction over this, because it's about sexualization of young looking anime characters. It's just "market forces" imposing the "right" view on a backwards culture. Easy for us to say "so what" or even "good".
But eventually China's going to be a big enough market that "market forces" will force elements such as zombies and skeletons (banned by Chinese gov) out of our games.
If Germany were a big market: no more nazi enemies.
If Japan were a big market: no more decapitations.
If India were a large market: no more kissing.
If middle eastern countries were a big market: no more smoking or drinking.
These "market forces" aren't always going to be what we've decided in America is morally right....
Silly Japanese, westerners only freak out about virtual butt slaps.Am I the only one who find it incredibly hilarious that the Japanese are freaking out over the fact that they can no longer see one virtual cartoon character's panties anymore?
![]()
As long as this is still in the game, I am content.
That's not evil prudes censoring gaming, though. That's... uh, different. Yes.imagine a world in which people got this upset about that male final fantasy character having his outfit changed to show less skin.
Remember when the devs of that game said they changed his design because it made people in focus testing uncomfortable?
Ya, not so sure we sure lil nerds whining about that one.