How long were you expecting the generation to last? The PS3 released in 2006 and the PS4 came out in 2013, which was 7 years later.
Most publishers wanted the generation shorter by about a year, so it would have presumably been a 6 year generation under normal circumstances. The generation will be 3 years old by the time this launches.
Yep. If Microsoft indicates they won't in fact do the exact same shit, count me in for an Xbox One.
Maybe wait until this happens before enraged?
Seriously, the meltdown is hilarious.
I sold my ps4 at 5$ on Amazon now. Just now. What a useless piece of plastic.
Goodness. This sounds like a massive step up doesn't it? ...can Uncharted look even better? Run at 60 FPS?
As long as PS4 1.0 is supported, I don't mind this. But I wonder if developers will bother optimizing for PS4 1.0, or even if the optimization for both will be balanced.
Can we please expect that? Will devs have to work a significant time to support two different PS4 versions?
The NX will save us all.
Hopefully Nintendo manage to keep the NX4K+ secret for a couple of years at least.
WTF is going on with Sony?
I aint throwing 500 quid on a new system.
![]()
Wouldn't this be for titles that are developed now and released much later in the gen though?No, it doesn't, what it does mean though is that you are going to have to suffer much poorer performance in any new titles that are released, who wants that? Devs aren't going to target the lower spec machine.
So it not native 4k then?
Stuff is conflicting now.
I just want to know:
Are current PS4 users getting the shaft?
Current PS4 users aren't going to be given poorer treatment are they? I worry that devs wont optimize games for us the same way anymore
Yep. If Microsoft indicates they won't in fact do the exact same shit, count me in for an Xbox One.
If you'd spent $800 on a computer 3 years ago you could be playing 4k games already, with free online and Steam sales.
but I don't have a 4k display.
Funny how a few years back Sony was talking about keeping things the same and traditional, then they do shit like this that no one asked for. We need a new competitor in the industry since Nintendo and Microsoft have become irrelevant.
They could subsidize programs so you'll get more than $150-200 for your PS4.Why do people keep asking for an official trade in program?
If you want to trade in a PS4 or any console you'll need to go thru Gamestop or some other retailer.
So it not native 4k then?
Stuff is conflicting now.
WTF is going on with Sony?
I aint throwing 500 quid on a new system.
![]()
You're going to sell your PS4 in protest of them giving consumers a choice to go buy a system that is currently weaker than the one you're selling...
And how long does PS45 stay relevant until PS5 is announced? 2019?
The phone argument doesn't work for consoles. If I buy a Samsung Galaxy 7 from T-Mobile, yes, it may cost $700 but I pay it off over a period of 24 months at $30 or whatever a month. Unless that option becomes available for consoles, with a free upgrade like phone providers do, then I don't see the market openly accepting this type of constant upgrade and change within the home console market.
Yes, I realize this is very disconcerting for people who like the regular console model. I'm not trying to say it isn't. My apologies if it was coming off that way. I was just trying to say they're switching to a two system a generation model with a new model halfway in between.I was expecting it to last about as long as the last generation did... I was under the impression that we wouldn't be seeing new hardware for a good long while.
Certainly not a system more expensive than the PS4 in a little over 3 years.
As the market gets older, games start to sell less as consumers get less excited about seeing new shininess, outside of the absolute biggest titles.Most publishers wanted shorter generations for what?
Not launching games?
A lot of studios didnt launch even one single game in this gen.