THR: Warner Bros. Mulls Releasing Fewer Films as 'Batman v. Superman' Stalls

Status
Not open for further replies.

Moonlight

Banned
People take a risk, and they get ripped to shreds for it.
All superhero movies to be Marvel formula based from now on. Yay.

I just hope this means they cancel Aquaman, and cancel Cyborg.
people take a risk when they climb something they're not supposed to and we don't laud them for brave pioneering and 'risk taking'

we call them dumbasses and putting millions of dollars and two iconic characters behind the guy who made sucker punch was one hell of a building they aren't supposed to climb
 
When you film a movie, and then hype it for two fucking years, this kind of thing happens. When you finally sleep with your high school crush when you're thirty, and it's not that great, your first reaction isn't "maybe I should have less sex".

... That's every big blockbuster nowadays.
 
Zack shouldn`t be allowed to make JL Part II. I guess it`s too late for I. I thought the movie is a 7/10, but it could have been a lot better with very minor changes. I basically had the same feeling for MoS, another movie that could have been great/amazing with a few minor changes. It looks like Zack is responsible for a lot of these dumbass changes.
 
There is absolutely no way to prove it, but I feel like things would've been different if everything was the same, but it was Christian Bale instead of Ben Affleck.

I don't think so because that wouldn't have fixed literally any of the things people take issue with about Batman v. Superman, especially since most people agree that Batfleck is one of the few good parts about it
 
Sell the rights back to Marvel.

Cyborg was the movie that was professed to us. It will bring balance the cinematic universes.
 
tumblr_m20n4n9ozP1ql141xo1_500.gif

OMG! Just perfect.
 
People take a risk, and they get ripped to shreds for it.
All superhero movies to be Marvel formula based from now on. Yay.

I just hope this means they cancel Aquaman, and cancel Cyborg.

Nothing to do with risk. Batman and Superman had the audience in the bag, but squandered it.
 

Sephzilla

Member
They said that about Spider-Man and the Avengers.

The people who own the DC comics film rights are also the people who own DC comics. The only way Disney would get those rights is if they straight up bought Warner Bros or if Warner Bros straight up sold DC, both of which would probably get crushed by monopoly laws.
 
I don't think so because that wouldn't have fixed literally any of the things people take issue with about Batman v. Superman, especially since most people agree that Batfleck is one of the few good parts about it
Yeah I established that in a later post.
What a load of bull.
Chill out dude. It's opinion. You shouldn't get so worked up about it.
Ben did a great job with what he was given.
I established that in a later post.
Have you seen BvS?
yes
 
That Cyborg movie looking less and less likely now lol. It doesn't really need to exist anyway. Make a Blue Beetle movie instead.
 

jett

D-Member
Several sources say Warner Bros. executives were convinced they had the goods with BvS and were shocked when negative reviews began pouring in.

I have to assume they thought they had the goods simply because it was a movie with Superman and Batman in it. Nobody in their right frame of mind looks at this picture and thinks to themselves, "awww yeaaaaa we got a crowd pleaser on our hands."

Now, with DC movies dated through 2020, the outcome has led to a flurry of rumors that the studio will make adjustments — maybe add a new producer? — rather than allow BvS director Zack Snyder to proceed with the two-part Justice League. But sources with firsthand knowledge of the situation say the studio has no such plans.

Yes, you imbeciles, triple-down on Snyder, I'm sure nothing will go wrong.
 
Mad Max: Fury Road probably didn't make very much profit.
It's a modern classic that may ultimately be worth as much if not more. BvS will be rebooted and mostly forgotten a decade from now. I'm reminded of Fincher's quote about Fight Club:
I happen to know that the movie's in the black, but there's receipts and there's worth. They are two different things. Because there are movies that make money and there are movies that are worth money, and sometimes the movies that are worth money make money later on. I honestly believe Fight Club is a title 20th Century Fox knows is going to make money for them in perpetuity.
 

Famassu

Member
Problem clearly isn't the # of films being released.
Maybe they should still take things a bit slower like Marvel did initially, instead of vomiting out one disaster after another so (relatively) quickly in succession before they've even nailed some kind of successful formula for one of their movies.
 

LevelNth

Banned
Is it really all Snyder though? MoS had a few script problems and questionable decisions, and from the sounds of things it looks like BvS has the same issue (haven't seen it yet).

Marvel caught lightning in a bottle on the back of an excellent, career saving performance by RDJ, and then took a chance on making further films (hit or miss) more character focused than similar films in the past.

And of course they benefited from being the first to do the universe type films for comic book properties and people went nuts. Nowadays it's not only common but expected really.
 

PBY

Banned
Is it really all Snyder though? MoS had a few script problems and questionable decisions, and from the sounds of things it looks like BvS has the same issue (haven't seen it yet).

Marvel caught lightning in a bottle on the back of an excellent, career saving performance by RDJ, and then took a chance on making further films (hit or miss) more character focused than similar films in the past.

And of course they benefited from being the first to do the universe type films for comic book properties and people went nuts. Nowadays it's not only common but expected really.

zack_snyder_metacritic.jpg
 

Alienous

Member
The people who own the DC comics film rights are also the people who own DC comics. The only way Disney would get those rights is if they straight up bought Warner Bros or if Warner Bros straight up sold DC, both of which would probably get crushed by monopoly laws.

That's assuming they wouldn't be willing to sell DC comics, isn't it? I don't see why it would have to be an all or nothing thing. You don't have to sell the Harry Potter film rights with the DC comics film rights.
 

Chariot

Member
The Justice League's greatest foe is now Zack Snyder. Even the ones like Darkseid and Braniac are reasonably scared of the man who holds the Anti-Fun Equation.
 

Henkka

Banned
They should've just kept the franchises separate. Nobody except hardcore DC comics fans wants to see Batman and Aquaman fight side by side.
 
That's assuming they wouldn't be willing to sell DC comics, isn't it? I don't see why it would have to be an all or nothing thing. You don't have to sell the Harry Potter film rights with the DC comics film rights; it wouldn't have to be an all or nothing thing.

They basically have no reason to ever sell DC
 

xsarien

daedsiluap
Give the DCTV/DCA people control of the DC movies. They've proven they actually know what they're doing when it comes to these characters.
 
Mad Max: Fury Road probably didn't make very much profit.

I don't know about that but it definitely succeeded in reviving a franchise that is arguably more popular now than it ever was. If they manage to make a sequel to Fury Road that is high-quality, we could be looking at a Batman Begins to TDK box office bump.
 
Beyond their DC stuff (Snyder) and their HP stuff (Yates), I could probably put WB's directors up against any other film studio and win
Wachowskis haven't really done anything critically acclaimed or successful in a while in the movie business. I don't even know how their Netflix show really did either since Netflix doesn't release those numbers.
 
The actual article says that they aren't considering any changes to the DC slate yet.

I can believe that WB is inept enough for that to be true.
 

PBY

Banned
His staunch defenders on this site have been awfully quiet as of late. Crow must be extra chewy.

I mean - I personally think Snyder is a hack, but I have to give him something - he's nothing if not consistent.

Like it or hate it, you know what you're getting.
 

Astorgh

Member
Snyder must be under great presure. Imagine being the guy whose failure makes a giant studio change its focus. I mean at some grade it must be “good” to have all the focus on some franchises, but it's a major change for a studio. I just hope this change brings good results.
 

SimleuqiR

Member
WB, like in the BvS line Supes says "bury the bat"....bury this DC cinematic universe. Stick to TV for another decade and relaunch it then.
 
If they don't give Zack Snyder the boot before Justice League, then they really deserve every failure they get. You have more than enough evidence that the audience did not like his style, and if you're doing yet another very high profile film with him, you're dumb.

this right here
 
Bale couldn't have sold this kind of Batman imo. Affleck was one of the highpoints of the movie.
yes, i'm well aware of the fact that affleck is cited as one of the highlights of this movie. i know i'm of the unpopular opinion but I didn't want bale replaced. that's not relevant here; i'm just wondering how differently the audience's reception and perception would've been if this were the case.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom