Democrat Debate 10 |CNN| Sometimes I just wanna punch you in your perfect teeth.

Status
Not open for further replies.
I don't know how any Bernie supporters can be anything but embarrassed by what a mess he is tonight. Petulant, rude, not answering, glib, laughing at the gun crisis answer. Just awful.
I'm pretty sure this is part of the appeal.
 
What does that have to do with what is being discussed? geeze

I was more addressing the term.

I say this knowing what Hillary did was dumb, but not illegal. She should be bodied under the idea what she did was secure, as even Edward Snowden called her out on that. But that's it.

Why is it still a thing with her?
 
Answer me this:



Why should gun manufacturers get special protection under the law that only vaccines get?




If you can't answer, kindly back off with this infuriating and misguided defense of the PLCAA, thanks.
It's the quintessential example of money in Politics buying special favors. And you guys are buying into it hook, line, and sinker because of a shitty "common sense" reasoning
.

I've been seeing it for a while, it really seems like a simplistic argument meant to hand wave away the fact that the guy who people have been holding up as the "last true progressive" has some really troubling views/history on gun control. That liberals are defending something like this must put the biggest smile on the NRA's face.
 
I was more addressing the term.

I say this knowing what Hillary did was dumb, but not illegal. She should be bodied under the idea what she did was secure, as even Edward Snowden called her out on that. But that's it.

Why is it still a thing with her?

Cause it's not a thing, it's another made up Republican issue.
 
I'm really looking forward to hearing both democratic candidates talk about climate change and the environment. It is arguably one of the most important issues facing the human species, not just Americans.
 
In actual numbers, no way. There is a disproportionately high number of minority inmates by percentage because the incarceration levels themselves are really small numbers
If that percentage held in a more populous state it would be ridiculous.

Do you argue that "in actual numbers, there's actually a lot of minorities working in Hollywood"? No! You think about representation in terms of percentages.
 
And I'm sorry Bernie I don't believe "superpredator" to be a racist term, I just don't. I have not much in common with the black gangbangers and murderers except the color of my skin. I've had this argument IRL several times. I've tried to view it through the lens that gang life must have been the dominant path to success for many people that lived in those conditions but I also know that when you kill as an adult you know, you know it's wrong, your family knows it's wrong, your community knows it's wrong. If that's the easier path, pick the hard one.
 
Same with Hillary isnt? She is totally not getting everything done when she is the most divisive political figure ever for conservatives.

At least she realizes that have College Kids protesting outside of Republican offices will not have them pass Single Payer healthcare.
 
But the first lady is directly responsible for federal crime bills?

Do people even blame for that thing ultimately? She was First Lady. Not a member of congress, etc. Who in their right mind actually holds that against her? I never got the impression that people did. Am I wrong?
 
I don't know, I don't read Salon.

I do know that Huff Post blog literally has zero quality control and produces laughable content.

Have you ever heard don't judge a book by its cover? I don't really know why you can't read the blog and verify for yourself what its saying... Or just enjoy your preconceived biases, i don't blame you if you cant let go.
 
It seems kind of hard to sway voters by saying "Yes, she's saying these things and her records show these things, but she took some money and that might cause her to make bad decisions"

It's not really saying anything about her and why she's wrong other than "maybe she might do something bad, who knows?" which isn't a strong stance at all.

Bernie is doing amazing tonight.

Laughing at gun control will be his end tonight. That was a key moment and he crashed and burned, hard.
 
I don't know how someone can support Bernie with his fucking horrid stance on guns.

Guns are legal. Why should you be held accountable for acting legally and responsibly? He said that if gun shop owners recklessly sell guns, they should be held accountable.

What is wrong with that? You can't just sue everybody for everything.
 
Quick, switch to FN and check out Cruz's speech...


It's like the opposite of watching the puppybowl during halftime, where you cringe rather than awww.
 
I've been seeing it for a while, it really seems like a simplistic argument meant to hand wave away the fact that the guy who people have been holding up as the "last true progressive" has some really troubling views/history on gun control. That liberals are defending something like this must put the biggest smile on the NRA's face.

I'm surprised that so many people believe the PLCAA does more than what it actually does.

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-m...n-gun-industry-wholly-protected-all-lawsuits/

It shields gun manufacturers and gun shop owners from being sued for criminal activities unless the manufacturer or the owner explicitly know the gun will be used for crime.
 
I know how it's a thing, but again...why?

Why must anti-reason be used here?

There is no anti-reason being used. She did nothing different then everyone before here, it was not until Kerry took SOS that email had to be in house. Additionally there was not a single confidential thing sent over email. Have you actually looked at what the typical email sent was?
 
It seems kind of hard to sway voters by saying "Yes, she's saying these things and her records show these things, but she took some money and that might cause her to make bad decisions"

It's not really saying anything about her and why she's wrong other than "maybe she might do something bad, who knows?" which isn't a strong stance at all.

But they were lobbyists!!!!
 
If Bernie were better with specifics in explanations he'd be doing a lot better. He just comes off as unprofessional unfortunately.
 
Same with Hillary isnt? She is totally not getting everything done when she is the most divisive political figure ever for conservatives.

She's not promising a revolution. She can also be trusted on knowing how to actually run a government. Bernie doesn't even know how the finance industry works, or why Saudi Arabia and Iran won't work together, I don't know why people trust him to run a country
 
And I'm sorry Bernie I don't believe "superpredator" to be a racist term, I just don't. I have not much in common with the black gangbangers and murderers except the color of my skin. I've had this argument IRL several times. I've tried to view it through the lens that gang life must have been the dominant path to success for many people that lived in those conditions but I also know that when you kill as an adult you know, you know it's wrong, your family knows it's wrong, your community knows it's wrong. If that's the easier path, pick the hard one.

So basically you are saying pull yourself up by the bootstraps... Recent research suggests poverty and chronic stress leads to brain damage especially in prefrontal cortex which is the decision center. Free will is not as free as it feels.
 
There is no anti-reason being used. She did nothing different then everyone before here, it was not until Kerry took SOS that email had to be in house. Additionally there was not a single confidential thing sent over email. Have you actually looked at what the typical email sent was?

My point of anti-reason was that it's been made into a hot button issue by Regressives.

Anti-reason is specifically the Republican party. I'm not saying you're pulling it, or it's a trick. It's just making mountains out of thoughts.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom