Mass shooting at Orlando gay nightclub [50 dead, 53 injured]

Status
Not open for further replies.

Fuu

Formerly Alaluef (not Aladuf)
This is gonna sound horrible, but at this point I can't feel anything. I've become numb to all these news about mass shootings in the US. They are just another statistic atop the previous statistics.
I understand the feeling, but at 50 dead this is the deadliest mass shooting in US history.
 

fanboi

Banned
My best guess is he was using a sporting rifle and people with little gun knowledge have mistakenly identified it as an assault rifle.

Semi automatic sporting rifles are also legal in just about every European country other than the UK.

It's not a technicality, neither practically or in the eye of the law.

Unless something else is stated I Believe the Mayor.
 

Slo

Member
Was there a bomb or wasn't there? I'm trying to wrap my mind around how a single person takes out 50 people and injures 50+ more even with an assault rifle. That's takes reloading multiple times even with a large magazine.
 
I know this shouldn't at all be the focus of this discussion, but does it bother anyone else to see all of the sad face emojis, "Holy shit wow" and other similar reactions in this thread? It just feels really disrespectful, intentionally or not. 50 people just died and you're going to use the response I'd text to my friend who had to work late? I don't think a sad face emoji is really an appropriate response to a mass murder.
 
Just read that the amount of people killed is 50 now. What a terrible, terrible loss of life.

Banning guns makes as much sense as banning Islam.

America allows for the freedom of religion and the freedom to bear arms.

We are constantly reminded, and rightly so, that the action of a few dont speak for the many: terrorist extremist are not your everyday muslim.

The same logic can and must be applied to gun owners: not all gun owners are extremist.

What people are asking in this thread is for a group to forfeit their rights in order to conform to a notion of what society should be for a minority. They are asking for the removal of a fundamental right.

I don't see people in this thread asking for a ban on Islam.
It shouldn't be a fundamental right. That is the whole problem. Nobody needs an assault rifle for day to day life. A handgun for home protection, I can understand. Anything above should only be used for hunting or sports and locked up at the gun range or club.

You're holding on to something written hundreds of years ago. Update the law to reflect modern times.
 
Well, assault rifles are guns, but I'm going to say with 100% certainty he didn't use an assault rifle here.

Assault rifles are not easily attainable in the U.S

They cost tens of thousands of dollars, require rigorous background checks and firearm registration.

How's that 100% certainty working out right now
 

Kyzer

Banned
Mass casualty events don't happen literally every day in my country

Ok so if they were then it would be okay for someone to say "I don't feel sorry for you "? Have some fucking respect and leave your political ideology at the god damn door.
 
Banning guns makes as much sense as banning Islam.

America allows for the freedom of religion and the freedom to bear arms.

We are constantly reminded, and rightly so, that the action of a few dont speak for the many: terrorist extremist are not your everyday muslim.

The same logic can and must be applied to gun owners: not all gun owners are extremist.

What people are asking in this thread is for a group to forfeit their rights in order to conform to a notion of what society should be for a minority. They are asking for the removal of a fundamental right.

I don't see people in this thread asking for a ban on Islam.
This is an absolute fucking mess of a post.
 

Kyzer

Banned
Where did I do that? All I am saying is you can't do this type of damage without a specific type of gun. Take that as you will.

Yes I know, it wasn't you. But the person you were responding to was quoting the person who did.
 
I'm so angry. I don't even know how to feel. What makes it even worse is seeing a dj who likes to promote his own business on his business Facebook page saying condemning things about the religion of who did this.

My friend of the same religion and his wife are in tears over this disgusting act.

I want to cry
 

trembli0s

Member
It is always so weird to me when the older generation in a community is less conservative (or more liberal) than the younger generation.

It's indoctrination and brain washing. I don't even understand how your mindset can become so skewed that you decide to follow this kind of shit.

My money is on this guy being decently educated, finished high school and maybe college, with a decent paying job that should have made him content in life. Instead, he starts reading the fundamentalist shit that people are peddling on the web and goes off the deep end.

I just don't understand.
 

The Lamp

Member
Well, assault rifles are guns, but I'm going to say with 100% certainty he didn't use an assault rifle here.

Assault rifles are not easily attainable in the U.S

They cost tens of thousands of dollars, require rigorous background checks and firearm registration.

If this is the case, I need to know if this terrorist legally saved up and bought these guns and passed those checks, or if he got it illegally.
 

Slo

Member
Assault rifles are not easily attainable in the U.S

They cost tens of thousands of dollars, require rigorous background checks and firearm registration.

AR-15s are about $1500, and I know of at least 3 of them just in my cul de sac.
 

caramac

Member
50+ dead? :(

The firearm situation in the US is a very complex one so l won't even go there, only to say one day l hope it gets sorted.

RIP to the victims.
 

Crisco

Banned
Was there a bomb or wasn't there? I'm trying to wrap my mind around how a single person takes out 50 people and injures 50+ more even with an assault rifle. That's takes reloading multiple times even with a large magazine.

Have you ever been in a night club? At that time of night, the place was probably packed wall to wall. Depending on the type of ammo he used, he's definitely hitting multiple people per shot.
 

azyless

Member
So because some people are pro-gun, you feel less sorry for the death of innocent people?

Disgusting.
It's not like I wish people would die, don't be obtuse. But expecting me to feel sorry literally every day when most of your own country doesn't and only wants to bring more firearms in the picture, is hypocrisy.
You grow used to it it's as simple as that.
Ok so if they were then it would be okay for someone to say "I don't feel sorry for you "? Have some fucking respect and leave your political ideology at the god damn door.
That's exactly what I'm saying and you're free to not believe me. If things like that were happening in my country it would also become routine.
 
I genuinely cannot understand the kind of deep-seated hatred once must have in their heart to do something like this against innocent people. It simply doesn't make sense.

Me either. I have guns, I have rifles but the idea of shooting innocent people down for no reason disgusts me.

Dude's a fucking evil lunatic.
 

Jeels

Member
Looks like the religion of peace strikes again. Horrible event that I hope will be a turning point for American politics. If not, this will be more frequent.

Great, now this begins. Let's be careful with identifying monsters for what they are but this type of stuff is going to hurt other minority groups.

Yes I know, it wasn't you. But the person you were responding to was quoting the person who did.

Np, I understand the point you were trying to make.
 
D

Deleted member 1235

Unconfirmed Member
Banning guns makes as much sense as banning Islam.

America allows for the freedom of religion and the freedom to bear arms.

We are constantly reminded, and rightly so, that the action of a few dont speak for the many: terrorist extremist are not your everyday muslim.

The same logic can and must be applied to gun owners: not all gun owners are extremist.

What people are asking in this thread is for a group to forfeit their rights in order to conform to a notion of what society should be for a minority. They are asking for the removal of a fundamental right.

I don't see people in this thread asking for a ban on Islam.
this kind of logic pisses me off so much, just amend your broken constitution again, because its broken and stupid and this is the result, which is something most people understand. fucks sake.
 

Madness

Member
Humans can't kill 50 other people in minutes without the use of guns. Guns and gun culture is the reason this bastard was able to kill so many people so easily.

False. France has some of the toughest gun laws for Europe. That didn't stop what 190 people from getting slaughtered? #1 the shooter was yet another muslim male. Compare the fact that muslim men are provably 0.5% of the total US population, coupled with the amount of people killed or # of attacks and you have a group grossly outnumbered.

This is an Islamic motivated terrorist hate crime attack in which mostly Gay men were killed because of hatred for them. This same guy would be able to or would have killed these people if he wanted to. Just like in every non-American country, terrorists have still been able to procure heavy weaponry and assault rifles. I agree the US gun culture and easy availability of guns is ridiculous. We've started to accept this as a commonplace occurrence for the US now. But after Sandy Hook, if nothing changed, it won't change now.
 
Banning guns makes as much sense as banning Islam.

America allows for the freedom of religion and the freedom to bear arms.

We are constantly reminded, and rightly so, that the action of a few dont speak for the many: terrorist extremist are not your everyday muslim.

The same logic can and must be applied to gun owners: not all gun owners are extremist.

What people are asking in this thread is for a group to forfeit their rights in order to conform to a notion of what society should be for a minority. They are asking for the removal of a fundamental right.

I don't see people in this thread asking for a ban on Islam.

A religious extremist by himself is simply just an unpleasant person to be around. A religious extremist with a gun murders 50 people in a matter of minutes.
 

Oriel

Member
Hundreds? I wish the us had hundreds instead of thousands.

Meant to say France, and the fact those were terrorist attacks. Terrorists, whether lone wolves or part of a terrorist cell will find a way to engage in mass murder whether guns are easily accessible or not.
 

TyrantII

Member
Wow, you're seriously putting all of the blame on the guns? That's sad. I hate guns myself, but this horrible person used those guns. The blame is on him. Guns are the unfortunate method to his madness.

I wouldn't be surprised if the gun was recently purchased.

Easy access to firearms makes these things... much easier to acomplish. Especially when some circumstance happens in the heat of the moment (doesn't seem to be the case here).

A waiting period and real background checks for all purchases in all 50 states would reduce gun deaths. Requiring safety course completion and regular updates ever few years would go even further.
 

GHG

Gold Member
Banning guns makes as much sense as banning Islam.

America allows for the freedom of religion and the freedom to bear arms.

We are constantly reminded, and rightly so, that the action of a few dont speak for the many: terrorist extremist are not your everyday muslim.

The same logic can and must be applied to gun owners: not all gun owners are extremist.

What people are asking in this thread is for a group to forfeit their rights in order to conform to a notion of what society should be for a minority. They are asking for the removal of a fundamental right.

I don't see people in this thread asking for a ban on Islam.

What the fuck?

I don't often come into any threads relating to gun debates etc but is this the general standard of logic applied by those who are pro-gun?
 

Lead

Banned
If this is the case, I need to know if this terrorist legally saved up and bought these guns and passed those checks, or if he got it illegally.
He didn't this is an AR-15, a semi automatic sporting rifle.
The cop leading the investigation said AR 15 on the news right now
An AR-15 is not an assault rifle, it's a semi automatic sporting rifle.
AR-15s are about $1500, and I know of at least 3 of them just in my cul de sac.
Sure AR-15 are cheaper, but they're also semi automatic.

If you can find an NFA M16 assault rifle for $1500 buy it right now because they're tens of thousands of dollars normally...
 

gatti-man

Member
Banning guns makes as much sense as banning Islam.

America allows for the freedom of religion and the freedom to bear arms.

We are constantly reminded, and rightly so, that the action of a few dont speak for the many: terrorist extremist are not your everyday muslim.

The same logic can and must be applied to gun owners: not all gun owners are extremist.

What people are asking in this thread is for a group to forfeit their rights in order to conform to a notion of what society should be for a minority. They are asking for the removal of a fundamental right.

I don't see people in this thread asking for a ban on Islam.
Guns make it far too easy for one persons desire to instantly kill other people. This is why I own a gun. I don't own a gun to protect myself from knife wielders or thieves or wild animals. I own a gun to protect myself from other crazy people who own guns. In Texas it takes less than 15 minutes to buy a gun and all the ammo I want. 15 minutes to kill people.

How is that logical in any way. It takes longer to buy a car. It takes longer to pay your taxes. It takes longer to buy a house. But a weapon of instant death? 15 minutes.
 

jstripes

Banned
I'm not arguing that point. I know that guns made it easier. I'm saying it's asinine to put all the blame on the guns instead of the monster that committed the acts.

Why not put the blame on BOTH?

He was a fucking psychopath AND US gun laws are insane.
 
Banning guns makes as much sense as banning Islam.

America allows for the freedom of religion and the freedom to bear arms.

We are constantly reminded, and rightly so, that the action of a few dont speak for the many: terrorist extremist are not your everyday muslim.

The same logic can and must be applied to gun owners: not all gun owners are extremist.

What people are asking in this thread is for a group to forfeit their rights in order to conform to a notion of what society should be for a minority. They are asking for the removal of a fundamental right.

I don't see people in this thread asking for a ban on Islam.

Irrationally comparing US Muslims to our Gun Violence problem, our anti-gun control lobbying problem, and the most lax laws imaginable is why fuck all can actually get done here, even when the majority of the country wants something to be done. (and most aren't calling for a complete ban, but literally nothing is able to get done. It's fucking criminal)
 

twobear

sputum-flecked apoplexy
Banning guns makes as much sense as banning Islam.

America allows for the freedom of religion and the freedom to bear arms.

that doesn't follow at all, unless you're saying that's nonsensical for lots of countries in the world to have freedom of religion but not freedom to bear arms.
 

Berordn

Member
I know this shouldn't at all be the focus of this discussion, but does it bother anyone else to see all of the sad face emojis, "Holy shit wow" and other similar reactions in this thread? It just feels really disrespectful, intentionally or not. 50 people just died and you're going to use the response I'd text to my friend who had to work late? I don't think a sad face emoji is really an appropriate response to a mass murder.

And the appropriate response is what, exactly?

I live down the street from this very club and I was woken up late into the night by the gunfire and authorities swarming in on the place. It was a part of my neighborhood and my community.

And yet I can't muster up the emotion strength myself to have a reaction that isn't 😔
 
I'm 100% sure the authorities/mayor is wrong.

They like to use the term "assault rifle" because it sounds more menacing than "sporting rifle" which it actually is.
I live in Denmark in Europe and I own an AR-15.

Honestly though, there is a massive difference between an AR-15 and a hunting rifle, I'm not sure why people try to evade that. We all know the difference between a automatic assault rifle and a semi. With that said, it is disingenuous to just label an AR-15 a 'sporting/hunting rifle'.
 

Paz

Member
Banning guns makes as much sense as banning Islam.

America allows for the freedom of religion and the freedom to bear arms.

We are constantly reminded, and rightly so, that the action of a few dont speak for the many: terrorist extremist are not your everyday muslim.

The same logic can and must be applied to gun owners: not all gun owners are extremist.

What people are asking in this thread is for a group to forfeit their rights in order to conform to a notion of what society should be for a minority. They are asking for the removal of a fundamental right.

I don't see people in this thread asking for a ban on Islam.

How is a rational person meant to even respond to this? Look I can be ridiculous too: Could I go buy a suitcase nuke at the 7/11 if I was a US citizen because it's my right?
 
Banning guns makes as much sense as banning Islam.

America allows for the freedom of religion and the freedom to bear arms.

We are constantly reminded, and rightly so, that the action of a few dont speak for the many: terrorist extremist are not your everyday muslim.

The same logic can and must be applied to gun owners: not all gun owners are extremist.

What people are asking in this thread is for a group to forfeit their rights in order to conform to a notion of what society should be for a minority. They are asking for the removal of a fundamental right.

I don't see people in this thread asking for a ban on Islam.
After a school shooting here in the UK they banned guns for private citizens, how many mass shootings has the UK had from 1996-2016........ one.

Gun crime hasn't been wiped out but just look at the stats in your own country, nearly 6000 deaths in just 6 months from gun crime.

screw your fundamental rights.

(apologies for the outburst and filthy language, I have removed it)
 

Nokterian

Member
This is always brought up in mass shootings.
If the Sandy Hook shooting where 20 children aged between 6 and 7 years old plus 7 adults were murdered didn't change anything, NOTHING fucking will.
Get used to it, this will happen, and nothing will be done about it.

Worst thing about it all..NRA have there hands in it and they will pay lots of governors money again to respect and pray for there family's but this will never change because the NRA has such a huge influence in all of it this will boost guns sales again..
 

TheOMan

Tagged as I see fit
I'm 100% sure the authorities/mayor is wrong.

They like to use the term "assault rifle" because it sounds more menacing than "sporting rifle" which it actually is.
I live in Denmark in Europe and I own an AR-15.

I don't think AR-15s are quite as hard to attain as you think they are.


Edit: Sorry, misunderstood.
 

Hoo-doo

Banned
An AR-15 is a semi automatic sporting rifle and they're also legal in many European countries. I live in Denmark and I own one.
Unless that thing was fully automatic they're wrong.

Are you going to stop with this crusade of yours anytime soon? Denmark has rather tight gun ownership/usage laws. The United States does not. The situations are not equal.

You don't have to blindly defend gun ownership every time a thread like this pops up. There's a legitimate problem with unrestricted access to guns. This isn't about your personal hobby or about your situation in Denmark.
 
Banning guns makes as much sense as banning Islam.

America allows for the freedom of religion and the freedom to bear arms.

We are constantly reminded, and rightly so, that the action of a few dont speak for the many: terrorist extremist are not your everyday muslim.

The same logic can and must be applied to gun owners: not all gun owners are extremist.

What people are asking in this thread is for a group to forfeit their rights in order to conform to a notion of what society should be for a minority. They are asking for the removal of a fundamental right.

I don't see people in this thread asking for a ban on Islam.

What the fuck is wrong with you?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom