• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Twitter has just banned Milo Yiannopoulos permanently

Status
Not open for further replies.
a temporary trending hashtag is not "backfiring"
Especially when a lot of their arguments boil down to but look at what Leslie posted! with caps of the exact same photoshopped tweets Milo posted that were in violation of the TOS in the first place. They're oblivious to how they're cementing Twitter's stance on this.

Only thing I can even remotely agree with them on is all the other shit like ISIS accounts and cop violence promotion Twitter completely fails at policing, and even then it's obvious they're not remotely arguing that in good faith. Especially that latter example.
 
How many new Twitter accounts claiming to be him circumventing the ban have popped up since the announcement? I figure that's the direction this will head towards next.
 
but really how do you ban someone from Twitter? can't hr just create a new (admittedly unverified) account?

why would they even verify him in the first place?
 
What's this #freemilo hashtag on Twitter?

Are they saying they want him back?
 
but really how do you ban someone from Twitter? can't hr just create a new (admittedly unverified) account?

why would they even verify him in the first place?

That is actualy a pretty big issue. Twitter handles banning pretty badly, even if only in "delete your account" kind of way.

They update the report things basicaly every other year but people are still mad that they could not handle those things like what happened to Leslie Jones in a good way
 
does anyone know why milo yiannopoulos is banned

Because of Hillary Clinton and the leftist, Marxist, Islamist, politically correct, abusive liberals.

At least that's what Breitbart seems to be implying. Well that and something about the RNC and the "Gays for Trump" platform being silenced.
 
Good. Fuck him and the sad sacks that love him.

Still upset it took this long. The fuck were they doing? Trying to calc the usage of losing this guy versus keeping him around? He has been doing this shit forever.
 
but really how do you ban someone from Twitter? can't hr just create a new (admittedly unverified) account?

why would they even verify him in the first place?

He won't have all his followers though, plus he loses his 4 character @ username and you won't be able to tell him apart from all the other fake Milo accounts.
 
Am I correct in thinking that this truly does cut him off at the knees?

He has a platform on Breitbart and a podcast... but that's a limited media for those in his bubble. If he doesn't have twitter, it seems like he has a much more limited reach into popular culture. He can't talk directly to his fans or mobilize them in the same way.
 
One of the greatest trolls ever. Very effective in his methods.

But that's also exactly why he was and should've been banned. He used Twitter mainly to harass people.
 
but really how do you ban someone from Twitter? can't hr just create a new (admittedly unverified) account?

why would they even verify him in the first place?

As soon as they caught on he'd be gone again.

He'd literally have to not be up front and loud, and that's all he can ever be.
 
Yeah, but it's been a couple of years since then and basically every GG thing that pops up is usually him inciting something. If you're still not aware of him until now you've got to have been living under a huge rock.

Um, not really. I use Social media a lot and I'm up to date with current affairs, but most people outside of GAF and other gaming boards have no fucking clue what GG is. People on message boards seem to think the whole thing is way more prevalent outside of those circles than it actually is lol
 
Um, not really. I use Social media a lot and I'm up to date with current affairs, but most people outside of GAF and other gaming boards have no fucking clue what GG is. People on message boards seem to think the whole thing is way more prevalent outside of those circles than it actually is lol

It got national media coverage
 
So maybe now people on here agree that free speech has its limits? I remember some people heavily criticizing Germany for forcing Facebook to delete comments about setting refugees on fire. Just sayin'.
 
Am I correct in thinking that this truly does cut him off at the knees?

He has a platform on Breitbart and a podcast... but that's a limited media for those in his bubble. If he doesn't have twitter, it seems like he has a much more limited reach into popular culture. He can't talk directly to his fans or mobilize them in the same way.

He can still presumably show up at colleges and talk to sad losers

So maybe now people on here agree that free speech has its limits? I remember some people heavily criticizing Germany for forcing Facebook to delete comments about setting refugees on fire. Just sayin'.
Twitter is not a state run enterprise.
 
So maybe now people on here agree that free speech has its limits? I remember some people heavily criticizing Germany for forcing Facebook to delete comments about setting refugees on fire. Just sayin'.
A private company banning someone is different than the government banning/deleting opinions they don't agree with.
 
So maybe now people on here agree that free speech has its limits? I remember some people heavily criticizing Germany for forcing Facebook to delete comments about setting refugees on fire. Just sayin'.

Germany is a democratic republic and Twitter is a company. They're not comparable here.
 
This has nothing to do with free speech.

Why? People here were telling me hate speech = free speech.

A private company banning someone is different than the government banning/deleting opinions they don't agree with.

Why? There's not much to agree upon when people post that refugees should burn. Those aren't "opinions". And Germany asks Facebook to delete such postings since all they do is spread more hate.

Germany is a democratic republic and Twitter is a company. They're not comparable here.

Yes, definitely. But the result is the same. And Twitter wouldn't have done it without the outside pressure by media reporting on it.
 
I apologize if I missed it but where in the article do they provide a source showing how he directed people to harass her?

Not defending him or anything like that mind you, fuck that loser.
 
Why? People here were telling me hate speech = free speech.



Why? There's not much to agree upon when people post that refugees should burn. Those aren't "opinions". And Germany asks Facebook to delete such postings since all they do is spread more hate.



Yes, definitely. But the result is the same. And Twitter wouldn't have done it without the outside pressure by media reporting on it.

Free speech aplies to government censorship, not private. Twitter banning Milo is like Burger King kicking someone out for yelling 'cuck cuck cuck' in their restaurant.
 
Free speech applies to government censorship, not private. Twitter banning Milo is like Burger King kicking someone out for yelling 'cuck cuck cuck' in their restaurant.
Great way to put it. Im literally Okay for people like him to just get banned from all social media outlets and limit their hate speech absolutely nothing is lost.
 
I apologize if I missed it but where in the article do they provide a source showing how he directed people to harass her?

Not defending him or anything like that mind you, fuck that loser.
It's been posted repeatedly in the thread but the main thing that fucked him over (in this particular case) was posting blatantly photoshopped tweets of Leslie being racist (not to mention a few blatant chan phrases I doubt anybody outside that sphere would ever recognize, let alone use like 'bix nood') and passing them off as real to fuel people attacking her. There's no way that doesn't count as inciting harassment in Twitter's ToS, even if they've turned a blind eye to him doing it previous times.
 
I apologize if I missed it but where in the article do they provide a source showing how he directed people to harass her?

Not defending him or anything like that mind you, fuck that loser.

AFAIK he's not doing it directly.

But--just like fans of big YouTube personalities--his fans immediately targeted anyone he's harassing/making fun of.
 
Free speech aplies to government censorship, not private. Twitter banning Milo is like Burger King kicking someone out for yelling 'cuck cuck cuck' in their restaurant.

lol, great way to put it 😄
I guess I'm fine with a government doing the same as a company and since Facebook thought "kill the refugees" was an a-okay statement for quite some time the government had to step in and I'm glad they did.
 
Peep r/the_donald on reddit. Defense squad is out for this guy smh

It's a sub filled exclusively with right wing, meme spewing contrarians obsessed with an anti-establishment narcissist who makes his own reality.

He couldn't be more perfectly tailored to them.
 
This is already backfiring and increasing exposure to his message.

Maybe its what he wanted ?
These "let's do nothing" arguments are so overused and stupid.
He already had all the publicity in the world thanks to Twitter, and leveraged it to lead harassment campaigns. Your argument is essentially "leave bullies alone or they'll be worse". That's not how you deal with bullies.

So yeah, he's going to cry a bit on his far right websites and podcasts, a few thousand idiots will continue to be racist and mysoginist shitheads and write "cuck cuck cuck" while masturbating to Trump, atheism and/or anime, but at the end of the day, he has lost a platform.

The real issue here is that Twitter has done fuck all in the past to deal with it and let things fester to that point.
 
So here's a question a lot of people I've seen using the #FreeMilo hashtag need to think about:

1) You argue that if Leslie Jones doesn't like it she can just leave Twitter and ignore it
2) You also argue that if Milo is forced to leave Twitter his career is over

Which is it? Superfluous or required?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom