a temporary trending hashtag is not "backfiring"
Pretty much.
That Kim/Taylor shit is gonna get more exposure than this clown after today on twitter and that happened on Sunday.
a temporary trending hashtag is not "backfiring"
Especially when a lot of their arguments boil down to but look at what Leslie posted! with caps of the exact same photoshopped tweets Milo posted that were in violation of the TOS in the first place. They're oblivious to how they're cementing Twitter's stance on this.a temporary trending hashtag is not "backfiring"
does anyone know why milo yiannopoulos is banned
does anyone know why milo yiannopoulos is banned
Im sure twitter would help.does anyone know why milo yiannopoulos is banned
memesdoes anyone know why milo yiannopoulos is banned
How many new Twitter accounts claiming to be him circumventing the ban have popped up since the announcement? I figure that's the direction this will head towards next.
does anyone know why milo yiannopoulos is banned
does anyone know why milo yiannopoulos is banned
Homophobia.does anyone know why milo yiannopoulos is banned
does anyone know why milo yiannopoulos is banned
does anyone know why milo yiannopoulos is banned
but really how do you ban someone from Twitter? can't hr just create a new (admittedly unverified) account?
why would they even verify him in the first place?
does anyone know why milo yiannopoulos is banned
What's this #freemilo hashtag on Twitter?
Are they saying they want him back?
but really how do you ban someone from Twitter? can't hr just create a new (admittedly unverified) account?
why would they even verify him in the first place?
but really how do you ban someone from Twitter? can't hr just create a new (admittedly unverified) account?
why would they even verify him in the first place?
Yeah, but it's been a couple of years since then and basically every GG thing that pops up is usually him inciting something. If you're still not aware of him until now you've got to have been living under a huge rock.
Um, not really. I use Social media a lot and I'm up to date with current affairs, but most people outside of GAF and other gaming boards have no fucking clue what GG is. People on message boards seem to think the whole thing is way more prevalent outside of those circles than it actually is lol
Am I correct in thinking that this truly does cut him off at the knees?
He has a platform on Breitbart and a podcast... but that's a limited media for those in his bubble. If he doesn't have twitter, it seems like he has a much more limited reach into popular culture. He can't talk directly to his fans or mobilize them in the same way.
Twitter is not a state run enterprise.So maybe now people on here agree that free speech has its limits? I remember some people heavily criticizing Germany for forcing Facebook to delete comments about setting refugees on fire. Just sayin'.
So maybe now people on here agree that free speech has its limits? I remember some people heavily criticizing Germany for forcing Facebook to delete comments about setting refugees on fire. Just sayin'.
A private company banning someone is different than the government banning/deleting opinions they don't agree with.So maybe now people on here agree that free speech has its limits? I remember some people heavily criticizing Germany for forcing Facebook to delete comments about setting refugees on fire. Just sayin'.
So maybe now people on here agree that free speech has its limits? I remember some people heavily criticizing Germany for forcing Facebook to delete comments about setting refugees on fire. Just sayin'.
This has nothing to do with free speech.
A private company banning someone is different than the government banning/deleting opinions they don't agree with.
Germany is a democratic republic and Twitter is a company. They're not comparable here.
So maybe now people on here agree that free speech has its limits?
Why? People here were telling me hate speech = free speech.
Why? There's not much to agree upon when people post that refugees should burn. Those aren't "opinions". And Germany asks Facebook to delete such postings since all they do is spread more hate.
Yes, definitely. But the result is the same. And Twitter wouldn't have done it without the outside pressure by media reporting on it.
Great way to put it. Im literally Okay for people like him to just get banned from all social media outlets and limit their hate speech absolutely nothing is lost.Free speech applies to government censorship, not private. Twitter banning Milo is like Burger King kicking someone out for yelling 'cuck cuck cuck' in their restaurant.
It's been posted repeatedly in the thread but the main thing that fucked him over (in this particular case) was posting blatantly photoshopped tweets of Leslie being racist (not to mention a few blatant chan phrases I doubt anybody outside that sphere would ever recognize, let alone use like 'bix nood') and passing them off as real to fuel people attacking her. There's no way that doesn't count as inciting harassment in Twitter's ToS, even if they've turned a blind eye to him doing it previous times.I apologize if I missed it but where in the article do they provide a source showing how he directed people to harass her?
Not defending him or anything like that mind you, fuck that loser.
I apologize if I missed it but where in the article do they provide a source showing how he directed people to harass her?
Not defending him or anything like that mind you, fuck that loser.
It got national media coverage
Free speech aplies to government censorship, not private. Twitter banning Milo is like Burger King kicking someone out for yelling 'cuck cuck cuck' in their restaurant.
Not in my country. Just because it's an ongoing conversation on GAF, doesn't mean it is in coffee shops and offices the world over. Most people probably don't know what it is, but I guess they're all living under rocks too.
Peep r/the_donald on reddit. Defense squad is out for this guy smh
These "let's do nothing" arguments are so overused and stupid.This is already backfiring and increasing exposure to his message.
Maybe its what he wanted ?
It's Twitter's right to free speech to decide not to have their service spread someone's hate and harassment.