"The Last Night" (Milkshake Duck incarnate) E3 Trailer [XBO/Win10/Steam 2018]

Status
Not open for further replies.
By taking the most neutral position on the matter and without an ounce of malice in my questioning, I'd like to know what you guys are trying to achieve here?

Just going by the number, I'd day 50 pages out of 55 are reprehending the creator's opinions and none of them are talking about the game which is not yet released.

Once again, no aggressivity on my end. Just genuinely trying to understand the goal of this (now derailled) thread.
 
By taking the most neutral position on the matter and without an ounce of malice in my questioning, I'd like to know what you guys are trying to achieve here?

Just going by the number, I'd day 50 pages out of 55 are reprehending the creator's opinions and none of them are talking about the game which is not yet released.

Once again, no aggressivity on my end. Just genuiney trying to understand the goal of this (now derailled) thread.

We, on this discussion forum; are discussing a matter of interest. We're going to achieve a nice chat. Join in if you like!
 
By taking the most neutral position on the matter and without an ounce of malice in my questioning, I'd like to know what you guys are trying to achieve here?

Just going by the number, I'd day 50 pages out of 55 are reprehending the creator's opinions and none of them are talking about the game which is not yet released.

Once again, no aggressivity on my end. Just genuiney trying to understand the goal of this (now derailled) thread.

Are you a woman?

Because you'd understand immediately if you were sincerely looking for it.

His views are part of the game. Nothing is derailed.

Plus, this
 
By taking the most neutral position on the matter and without an ounce of malice in my questioning, I'd like to know what you guys are trying to achieve here?

Just going by the number, I'd day 50 pages out of 55 are reprehending the creator's opinions and none of them are talking about the game which is not yet released.

Once again, no aggressivity on my end. Just genuiney trying to understand the goal of this (now derailled) thread.
He stated his views are the basis of the game, an exploration of what he sees as the dangers of things like feminism.

His views are part of the game. Nothing is derailed.

There you go.
 
By taking the most neutral position on the matter and without an ounce of malice in my questioning, I'd like to know what you guys are trying to achieve here?

Just going by the number, I'd day 50 pages out of 55 are reprehending the creator's opinions and none of them are talking about the game which is not yet released.

Once again, no aggressivity on my end. Just genuiney trying to understand the goal of this (now derailled) thread.
I'm a bit surprised that this wasn't rolled into it's own thread yet
thing is, this Tim guy really holds quite a number of reprehensible ideas
 
By taking the most neutral position on the matter and without an ounce of malice in my questioning, I'd like to know what you guys are trying to achieve here?

Just going by the number, I'd day 50 pages out of 55 are reprehending the creator's opinions and none of them are talking about the game which is not yet released.

Once again, no aggressivity on my end. Just genuiney trying to understand the goal of this (now derailled) thread.

It's not really derailed. The game has a nice art and a shitty story where "feminism ruined the world".

If it was just the devs views, we could say it's derailed, but no, the dev repeatedly stated that his game is exploring how women and progressives are worst.
 
He stated his views are the basis of the game, an exploration of what he sees as the dangers of things like feminism.

His views are part of the game. Nothing is derailed.

There you go.

Yep. The story apparently reflects these views. Which is the most disappointing part... because that would make it impossible to separate from the creator.
 
By taking the most neutral position on the matter and without an ounce of malice in my questioning, I'd like to know what you guys are trying to achieve here?

Just going by the number, I'd day 50 pages out of 55 are reprehending the creator's opinions and none of them are talking about the game which is not yet released.

Once again, no aggressivity on my end. Just genuiney trying to understand the goal of this (now derailled) thread.

The dev has explicitly stated that the premise of the game is feminism=evil. It's a masturbatory alt right fantasy.
 
By taking the most neutral position on the matter and without an ounce of malice in my questioning, I'd like to know what you guys are trying to achieve here?

Just going by the number, I'd day 50 pages out of 55 are reprehending the creator's opinions and none of them are talking about the game which is not yet released.

Once again, no aggressivity on my end. Just genuiney trying to understand the goal of this (now derailled) thread.

We're discussing something on a forum, which is made for discussion. That tends to be the "goal" of most forums. It's not a derail, according to his tweets his beliefs that modern feminism is bad were going to be woven into the story of the game. Given his continued tweeting with the same beliefs even up to this year, chances are high that's still the case.
 
How so ? There's the far-right there in the form of Trump and Le Pen, why would someone with far right ideologies not vote for them ?

Who you vote for doesn't somehow define who you are in every other aspect of life or vice versa. I've met Alt Righters that voted for Bernie, several of them. It's hardly rare or unheard of.
 
"Fake news"!

Melenchon's views on NATO etc are not unknown.
No they're not and you still seem to be ignorant to them.
Unless you're saying Trump also wants to leave NATO because he doesn't want to follow americans into war ? Or because he thinks there are better things to spend money on than more military ?

Who you vote for doesn't somehow define who you are in every other aspect of life or vice versa. I've met Alt Righters that voted for Bernie, several of them.
I wouldn't call them alt-righters but okay.
 
We, on this discussion forum; are discussing a matter of interest. We're going to achieve a nice chat. Join in if you like!

Do want, yes. It's so rare that I post !

Are you a woman?

Because you'd understand immediately if you were sincerely looking for it.

Huum no, I'm a man.

He stated his views are the basis of the game, an exploration of what he sees as the dangers of things like feminism.

His views are part of the game. Nothing is derailed.

There you go.

Well I've searched a bit and the core idea (at least the newest I could find since the reveal trailer) behind the game seems to be more akin to IA surpassing humans in every possible way and finding a new purpose in life. Not particulary feminisim or anything. No ?
 
not to, um, interrupt this discussion, but

DCHSurMW0AAutDG.jpg
 
No they're not and you still seem to be ignorant to them.
Unless you're saying Trump also wants to leave NATO because he doesn't want to follow americans into war ? Or because he thinks there are better things to spend money on than more military ?


I wouldn't call them alt-righters but okay.

They call themselves the Alt right as proudly as they say they voted for Bernie.
 
Whether the guy is self-proclaimed "alt right" or not is irrelevant. Who he voted for means shit if his beliefs and recent statements are in line Trump supporters and every other dumbass fascist out there.

not to, um, interrupt this discussion, but

Perfect.
 
Do want, yes. It's so rare that I post !



Huum no, I'm a man.



Well I've searched a bit and the core idea (at least the newest I could find since the reveal trailer) behind the game seems to be more akin to IA surpassing humans in every possible way and finding a new purpose in life. Not particulary feminisim or anything. No ?
You can search more and see where he talks about the game at the inception. It's been posted in this thread and in news articles multiple times. All of this is fair game to discuss. You can discuss other elements if you want to but we are on-topic and discussing matters that are directly relevant to this game and developer.

Have a good day.
 
At last a game that fully understands the shortcomings of an automated work force. Not that the corporations will refuses to share their wealth when they own it all, but that it actually works and we live in a utopia. How can the white man claim to suffer in a world where nobody suffers? It's the darkest future of them all.
 
I don't understand the concept but I believe you.


It's not.

It is.

Anti-NATO, anti-EU, pro-Russia, hell Melenchon and Trump are also anti-Germany.

Seriously, Melenchons views on Germans are outright xenophobic. Melenchon is a shameful leftist.

No wonder the dev likes him.
 
Well I've searched a bit and the core idea (at least the newest I could find since the reveal trailer) behind the game seems to be more akin to IA surpassing humans in every possible way and finding a new purpose in life. Not particulary feminisim or anything. No ?

By his own admission his thoughts on feminism will be themes within the game.
http://i.imgur.com/KmpDjSb.png
Other tweets talked about how due to "modern feminism and progressives winning" the world had become a dystopia where genders were being erased. Go back and read more of the thread to see what people are actually talking about.
 
I don't understand the concept but I believe you.

Is it really that hard? They are mostly anti establishment dudes who saw a rebellion and movement against the accepted norms in this country and society that they don't like. They found the same exact thing in the Alt right after Bernie's campaign ended but a far more twisted and ugly version. They just found a new way to stick it to the man and be rebels.
 
At last a game that fully understands the shortcomings of an automated work force. Not that the corporations will refuses to share their wealth when they own it all, but that it actually works and we live in a utopia. How can the white man claim to suffer in a world where nobody suffers? It's the darkest future of them all.

Oh jesus

I'm not getting any sleep tonight huh
 
You can search more and see where he talks about the game at the inception. It's been posted in this thread and in news articles multiple times. All of this is fair game to discuss. You can discuss other elements if you want to but we are on-topic and discussing matters that are directly relevant to this game and developer.

Have a good day.

Wishing me a good day while I just joined the discussion is a bit mean...

To answer you, yeah I've seen the tweets like everybody else really. Maybe they're an outdated views on the core principals behind the game's story or maybe they're not. I really can't know this.
 
Is it really that hard? They are mostly anti establishment dudes who saw a rebellion and movement against the accepted norms in this country and society that they don't like. They found the same exact thing in the Alt right after Bernie's campaign ended but a far more twisted and ugly version. They just found a new way to stick it to the man and be rebels.
I get the anti-establishment part, and I can imagine people voting for the other extreme after their candidate was eliminated or something. I don't really understand identifying with the alt-right while supporting the far left though.
 
Wishing me a good day while I just joined the discussion is a bit mean...

To answer you, yeah I've seen the tweets like everybody else really. Maybe they're an outdated views on the core principals behind the game's story or maybe they're not. I really can't know this.

Most people are erring towards the side of caution since there is plenty of evidence his viewpoints have not changed as of this year (and it would take a lot of work to alter the presentation of themes in a game, so if he still was posting inflammatory things last month what incentive would there be to alter the game up until that point), and little evidence saying that he has changed. Rather than saying "the game no longer supports those viewpoints" the best the lead writer can say is something to the effect that is will present lots of viewpoints, which is a pretty toothless statement imo.
 
I get the anti-establishment part, and I can imagine people voting for the other extreme after their candidate was eliminated or something. I don't really understand identifying with the alt-right while supporting the far left though.

You seem to believe that supporting the far left means agreeing with every single point they make.

In reality, no politician has the exact same views on everything as his voters. Most voters cherry-pick the parts they like while ignoring or minimizing the parts they don't.

There are also single-issue voters who will support left/center/right as long as they agree on the only one issue they care about.

Anti-establishmentarianism is one such single issue.
 
So let me get this right. Some games recently have added themes and topics relating characters being gay or having certain progressive view points, then the gamergate bellends get triggered and harass developers. But then a ganergater makes a video game which is met with backlash from those who dislike gamergate and they get triggered. It's almost like they now know what it's like to be in that position.

Can almost hear Sargon of Akkad getting the neckbeard sweats. Who will male a video first, Jim Sterling or Sargon?
 
Most people are erring towards the side of caution since there is plenty of evidence his viewpoints have not changed as of this year (and it would take a lot of work to alter the presentation of themes in a game, so if he still was posting inflammatory things last month what incentive would there be to alter the game up until that point), and little evidence saying that he has changed. Rather than saying "the game no longer supports those viewpoints" the best the lead writer can say is something to the effect that is will present lots of viewpoints, which is a pretty toothless statement imo.

I kinda get your point. Outside the fact that caution is not really what's been exerciced here but more like total annilahtion of the game's seemingly (I do emphasise this word) anti-IA vision and like, the creator itself.

What I don't understand really is the hostility toward the game, whishing it to fail instead of maybe trying to alert the developers (which have already responded but hey, it got sunk pretty fast).

(sorry for the slow responses, english is not my main language)
 
Skimming through this thread since last night. Sounds like he issued an apology, the publisher issued an apology saying he's changed since 2014, and then people found out he kept liking toxic tweets as recently as a few weeks ago? Is that the update?
 
Skimming through this thread since last night. Sounds like he issued an apology, the publisher issued an apology saying he's changed since 2014, and then people found out he kept liking toxic tweets as recently as a few weeks ago? Is that the update?
Yeah. It also wasn't much of an apology frankly.
 
I kinda get your point. Outside the fact that caution is not really what's been exerciced here but more like total annilahtion of the game's seemingly (I do emphasise this word) anti-IA vision and like, the creator itself.

What I don't understand really is the hostility toward the game, whishing it to fail instead of maybe trying to alert the developers (which have already responded but hey, it got sunk pretty fast).

(sorry for the slow responses, english is not my main language)
People tend to not want regressive media to be successful since it could further and normalize regressive views.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom