Next-Gen PS5 & XSX |OT| Console tEch threaD

Status
Not open for further replies.
MS getting cocky gotta be awkward if tommy fisher was right haha


zm8vrOY.jpg
 
Last edited:
Raw speed only (about 5GB/s actually). The SSD patent is talking about speeds of up to 20 GB/s is some conditions and usually 10 GB/s in most conditions.
Wow, that would mean the PS5 SSD might be twice as fast than the SSD of XSX. Looking forward to see the impact of this. XSX is already loading old games within 6s, so even if PS5 is able to do this in 3s, what's the added value really.
 
Kleegamefan on the other site already laeked the 12.1 tf number well before Tommy. And the 52CUs was very simple once you knew the total CUs were 56 CUs in the github data. They had to deactivate 4 CUs for yields, it was inevitable.

Guys just don't put too much expectations on his PS5 specs. Tommy just made the most reasonnable guess.

Nah Klee did not leak that number .
He confirm 12 after it came out by warren\WC but before he was 10 Plus for both .
But tommy guess was very well done it seem at least for XBX 12.1 and RDNA 2 before anyone else.
 
Last edited:
Kleegamefan on the other site already laeked the 12.1 tf number well before Tommy. And the 52CUs was very simple once you knew the total CUs were 56 CUs in the github data. They had to deactivate 4 CUs for yields, it was inevitable.

Guys just don't put too much expectations on his PS5 specs. Tommy just made the most reasonnable guess.
Saying it's 12.1 and not just 12. Saying it's 1.82 and not just 1.8.

And what about 7nm EUV? And what about RDNA 2?
 
Nah Klee did not leak that number .
He confirm 12 after it came out by warren\WC but before he was 10 Plus for both .
But tommy guess was very well done it seem at least for XBX 12.1 and RDNA 2 before anyone else.

Klee was the first one to confirm 12.1 and RDNA while "MS insiders" backtracked on the 12 number (Tom Warren on twitter) and so far he hasn't been wrong when it comes to specs.
 
Nah Klee did not leak that number .
He confirm 12 after it came out by warren\WC but before he was 10 Plus for both .
But tommy guess was very well done it seem at least for XBX 12.1 and RDNA 2 before anyone else.
yea the guy is banned , the least we can do is give him credit for something he did and no one else did. 12.1 rdna2 TF with 52 CU . he went against github (56 active cU) and turned out correct
 
Why did he shit on himself by making those stupid ass fake photoshopped PS5 fat warped controllers?


Yeah I still dont trust
not a single time in the video they mentioned most powerful console lol they are actualy not cocky at all. you forgot cocky MS? "I just witnessed the most powerful console in the milky way galaxy" lol


Sorry edited my post if you check it again you will see there claim aha
 
Here is a question to y'all:

1) If PS5 has reduced number of compute units with higher frequency versus XsX with higher number of compute units but with lower frequency which GPU is better?
2) Is 2Ghz possible now for PS5 GPU?

If PS5 does have same number of compute units as XsX but with higher frequency then PS5 wins.
 
This is brilliant ! And a great summary.

12.147 actually.

Raw speed only (about 5GB/s actually). The SSD patent is talking about speeds of up to 20 GB/s is some conditions and usually 10 GB/s in most conditions.
In the video they say 12.155, so probably the actual clock is 1,826.17 but they said 1,825 because it looks better.
 
Here is a question to y'all:

1) If PS5 has reduced number of compute units with higher frequency versus XsX with higher number of compute units but with lower frequency which GPU is better?
2) Is 2Ghz possible now for PS5 GPU?

If PS5 does have same number of compute units as XsX but with higher frequency then PS5 wins.

Depends how many compute units its an unanswerable question due to Sony silence I can only imagine they would likely feel very confident with themselves and the ps5 right about now DF showed a whole spec sheet ahaha
 
PlayStation 5: 56 CU @ 1.8 Ghz (= 12.9 TFLOPS), or 52 CU @ 2.0 Ghz (= 13.3 TFLOPS)?

Which one is it going to be? Or neither?

First one is more likely and save bet, but they could both be right. But we can clearly say that these consoles will be so fucking close, that it doesn't even matter. Both of them will run third party with the same graphics settings, fps etc. Maybe the one will have better RT capabilities and better loading times.
 
Last edited:
PlayStation 5: 56 CU @ 1.8 Ghz (= 12.9 TFLOPS), or 52 CU @ 2.0 Ghz (= 13.3 TFLOPS)?

Which one is it going to be? Or neither?

I think its going to be 52 compute units at 2.0 Ghz or lower number of compute units with 2.0 Ghz

I think Sony managed to reach 2.0 Ghz for their GPU.

Why is Cerny so adamant in reaching 2.0 GHz for its GPU? 🤔🤔😯
 
Kleegamefan on the other site already laeked the 12.1 tf number well before Tommy. And the 52CUs was very simple once you knew the total CUs were 56 CUs in the github data. They had to deactivate 4 CUs for yields, it was inevitable.

Guys just don't put too much expectations on his PS5 specs. Tommy just made the most reasonnable guess.
Didn't Githuggers say it was 56 active, 60 total, >400mm² die size?
 
stop this fisher nonsense, he said many things and most are bullshit and/or copied from other leaks.

Crazy, just crazy how some are STILL defending him after all the bullshit and lies. Only thing that is true is that some people are just too damn stupid and hard headed to see the obvious truth

No, i won't stop. He is right in this particular things so... 😜
 
3584 ops/clk/shader is 100% referring to active CUs.
Oh Really...? DF just officially confirmed Xbox SX has 52 Active cu's out of 56 (3328 shaders)🤦‍♂️


Change your name to Amateur Elite... you are definitely not a Pro 😂

For context:

Tommy Fisher claimed xbox sx is 52 cu's 12 TF

Then R600 Replied to Tommy

He made a rookie mistake. XSX is 56CU chip so...


Me Myself and I Replied to R600

I think you make a rookie mistakes... 56 cu's doesnt mean that all 56 are Active, it is possible that 4 are deactivated Because of yield's

No surprise R600 was asking for a self Ban 🤷‍♂️
 
Last edited:
Sony has played their cards right and let microsoft show their cards. Sony are well prepared to announce the ps5 details in july 2020. It will also be the same date that end game occurs for xbox.
 
Oh Really...? DF just offically confirmed Xbox SX has 52 Active cu's out of 56 (3328 shaders)🤦‍♂️

Change your name to Amateur Elite... you are definitely not a Pro 😂

For context:

Tommy Fisher claimed xbox sx is 52 cu's 12 TF

Then R600 Replied to Tommy




Me Myself and I Replied to R600
haha where is dukeblueballs and his github info to swear for us that XSX is 56 active? Proelite Proelite
 
The SX won't have 13gb for games. It will have either 16+4/8 or 16+something else. It won't limit it to 13gb, it would be suicide, even more so against a higher memory PS5. The speeds are up for debate, yes, but I highly, highly doubt they would be this short sighted but in the ball with everything else, even more so when this is the exact same misstep that happened last gen (banking on Sony only having 4gb, switched to 8gb).

In fact o wouldn't be surprised to see either console bump that 16gb up even. Even last gen, 2 years ago, 16gb for games was pushing it. I see no reason why a machine that has to last another 6-8 years would be stuck with an such a low figure, when everything else is top shelf. Even more so when you think about memory being so important at such high resolutions (both screen and asset).
Apparently Microsoft just commited suicide according to our insider here.
 
Xbox Series X supporting 802.11ax/Wifi 6 is excellent news. But the Series X supporting VR with a wireless Wifi Direct VR headset would be a dream come true.

If Microsoft doesn't want to build a headset themselves, they should atleast partner with either Oculus, or Valve, or both and announce that the Xbox Series X will be compatible with those headsets. Being able to pair my Oculus Quest (and it's eventual 4K successor) with the Xbox Series X would be absolutely fantastic.


A $500 system powerful enough for 4K VR will sell like hotcakes. The Series X has the horsepower to power life like VR environments.
 
Last edited:
Xbox Series X supporting 802.11ax/Wifi 6 is excellent news. But the Series X supporting VR with a wireless Wifi Direct VR headset would be a dream come true.

If Microsoft doesn't want to build a headset themselves, they should atleast partner with either Oculus, or Valve, or both and announce that the Xbox Series X will be compatible with those headsets. Being able to pair my Oculus Quest (and it's eventual 4K successor) with the Xbox Series X would be absolutely fantastic.


A $500 system powerful enough for 4K VR will sell like hotcakes. The Series X has the horsepower to power life like VR environments.

Where does it say it supports wifi 6?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom