Exclusives, without question. Competition is healthy for the industry.
I voted for achievements.
More games being added to back compat would be so nice.
Yeah, going to be too hard to walk that one back unfortunately. They could do Windows Store Exclusives but that's not what people mean.Exclusives are good, but with Xbox that still means "also on PC". Especially with their next system.
Why subnautica 2 thoJust imagine of xbox made subnautica 2 and forza 6 exclusive, it could have been big for xbox.
How to quickly and reliably lower your Neogaf rating by typing two words.I voted for achievements.
Hard to do Windows Store exclusives too since their store is total crap (they tried at first, their games only became relevant on PC after Steam releases began)Yeah, going to be too hard to walk that one back unfortunately. They could do Windows Store Exclusives but that's not what people mean.
How to quickly and reliably lower your Neogaf rating by typing two words.![]()
No, but you get a promotion to the rank - Jez Topher Corden Senior Trophy HunterMy NeoGAF rating can go lower?
![]()
I mean recently. Halo, gears and forza should have stayed exclusive for the long term.Why subnautica 2 tho
Yeah but why bring up Subnautica 2, game has nothing to do with XboxI mean recently. Halo, gears and forza should have stayed exclusive for the long term.
If MS was wise, they could have made a deal to at least make it xbox console exclusive. Subnautica 2 will still launch on ps5 soon Well my point is business strategy.Yeah but why bring up Subnautica 2, game has nothing to do with Xbox
nah, i remeber a leaked list that showed their internal calculations for money hating games and the numbers were all hilariously wrong (like they wanted to pay 5M for BG3 to be on gamepass lmao)If MS was wise, they could have made a deal to at least make it xbox console exclusive. Subnautica 2 will still launch on ps5 soon Well my point is business strategy.
Moneyhatting a 3rd party game is WAY too expensive when you are way too behind in install base. The cost of moneyhat is inversely proportional to the percentage of the market you control. With 0 on one end and infinity on the other. Ms can't afford to moneyhat. And worse, now they can't afford to make their 1st party exclusive either. It is all because they don't sell enough hardware, the one thing they pretended didn't matter. And now they pay the price.If MS was wise, they could have made a deal to at least make it xbox console exclusive. Subnautica 2 will still launch on ps5 soon Well my point is business strategy.
Moneyhatting a 3rd party game is WAY too expensive when you are way too behind in install base. The cost of moneyhat is inversely proportional to the percentage of the market you control. With 0 on one end and infinity on the other. Ms can't afford to moneyhat. And worse, now they can't afford to make their 1st party exclusive either. It is all because they don't sell enough hardware, the one thing they pretended didn't matter. And now they pay the price.
Since xbox series s/x alresdy lost its practical not to get exclusivity contracts since no one wants to buy a six year old series s/x that already lost this gen. I hope Helix will be back to same principle of xbox OG and xbox 360 that made this two console competitivenah, i remeber a leaked list that showed their internal calculations for money hating games and the numbers were all hilariously wrong (like they wanted to pay 5M for BG3 to be on gamepass lmao)