• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

PROMETHEUS Full Theatrical Trailer (2:32) + International UK trailer (2:47)

Status
Not open for further replies.
I seem to remember they were initially meant to be benevolent, but cheap drama gotta cheap...

You mean any drama? What thriller/horror/sci-fi involves benevolent aliens? Also, nothing was set in stone universe-wise before this movie. Whatever ideas Scott may have had about space jockeys before, it was never canon because it was never outlined on film. Therefore nothing has been retconned.

Definitely. Not that we've heard much, but it's Lindelof, so...
And then there would be the story: if it's anything like the supposed synopsis out there (and boy do the trailers seem to fit), it's pretty damn terrible.

Snap Judgements: The Poster

If the dialogue was any more spliced up in this trailer, we would have only had syllables.

Also, lets condemn a script as terrible based on not only a synopsis, but a rumored synopsis. I would certainly hope that a film could be greater than the sum of it's taglines.
 
Best Erigu jab ever.
I dunno, man, was it really directed at me?


You mean any drama?
No, by "cheap drama", I mean "cheap drama".

Whatever ideas Scott may have had about space jockeys before, it was never canon because it was never outlined on film. Therefore nothing has been retconned.
I didn't say anything about that. What annoys me is that it looks we might just get more eviiiiil aliens instead of a more complex/thoughtful SF story (especially disappointing considering that species can't be considered "wild animals").

Snap Judgements: The Poster
After dozens of pages of people creaming their pants over a trailer, "best movie ever!", etc, really? Hahaha!

lets condemn a script as terrible based on not only a synopsis, but a rumored synopsis.
I didn't "condemn" anything (you snappy you), but like I said, it seems to fit, sadly enough.
 
I didn't "condemn" anything (you snappy you), but like i said, it seems to fit, sadly enough.

Paraphrased: "If it's like the synopsis, and I really think it is, then it's pretty terrible".

That's you condemning it as something based on a paragraph of story beats.


After dozens of pages of people creaming their pants over a trailer, really? Hahaha!

There's a big fucking difference between people going:

"OMG MY PANTS ARE GONE THE PRODUCTION VALUES LOOK INSANE"

and you saying:

"The writing is terrible."

Based on a trailer.
 
FAMILY IS EVERYTHING TO MEEE

/one tit hanging out

HAHAHAHA

I didn't realize that was her.

So what are the chances that the distress/warning beacon that the Nostromo homes in on is that left by the crew of the Prometheus?
I don't know. It makes sense, but they look like rather different planets in terms of geography.

rscottalienset01.jpg

A7A2z.jpg
 
HAHAHAHA

I didn't realize that was her.


I don't know. It makes sense, but they look like rather different planets in terms of geography.

I said left by the crew of the Prometheus, not originating from the Prometheus, because we know the warning signal is coming from the derelict spaceship. So perhaps they leave on on board/around that area.
 
Paraphrased: "If it's like the synopsis, and I really think it is, then it's pretty terrible".
Even in your paraphrase, there's an "if", see?

There's a big fucking difference between people going:
"OMG MY PANTS ARE GONE THE PRODUCTION VALUES LOOK INSANE"
and you saying:
"The writing is terrible."
Based on a trailer.
What I've heard in the trailer and the viral videos was pretty bad (and sounded a lot like the usual Lindelof dreck).
Yes, I'm commenting on what little I've heard, just like you're commenting on what little you've seen. Cry me a river.
 
We are all talking qualitatively about aspects of the movie based on 2:30 of footage, but there are some things that give a more complete impression in that condensed amount of time than others.

If you were saying "The use of CGI looks bad" or "I really dislike the production design", then I would completely disagree, but at least I would understand that you have something to base your statements on. The first third of the trailer is cut to get some semblance of a plot into the minds of the audience, but the vast majority of it is spent on establishing the atmosphere and scope of the visuals.

Conversely if this was a trailer for a Quentin Tarantino movie, you would probably have plenty of content with which to base an opinion on the writing.

Even in your paraphrase, there's an "if", see?


What I've heard in the trailer and the viral videos was pretty bad (and sounded a lot like the usual Lindelof dreck).
Yes, I'm judging from what little I've heard, just like you're judging from what little you've seen. Cry me a river.

Your problem is that you are flashing everyone else here your hand by endlessly bringing Lindelof into the conversation, when his contribution to the script is confirmed to be cursory. You have no idea whether any of the "dreck" you've heard in the trailer or viral videos is even his. BUT you've made it clear that you will be predisposed to looking at any of his future work in a negative light thanks to Lost.
 
We are all talking qualitatively about aspects of the movie based on 2:30 of footage, but there are some things that give a more complete impression in that condensed amount of time than others.
*cough*
This cannot, and will not disappoint. At least not in any way that isn't minor quibbles. There is far too much good readily apparent in the trailer to not walk out of the theater at least satisfied.
Yep, no snappy judgments at all, there...
Seriously, now...

his contribution to the script is confirmed to be cursory.
I might blame him for the dialogues (again, they really sound like the usual Lindelof crap), but the actual story is another matter: I realize he wasn't the first writer on board.

You have no idea whether any of the "dreck" you've heard in the trailer or viral videos is even his.
Educated guess (and I believe he said himself he wrote the TED thing, actually?).


As I've already said, it doesn't. I've pointed out one glaring hole in that synopsis.
Sorry, I missed that.
I noticed some differences as well, but the similarities make me think the thing might still be legit, an earlier draft that is still fairly recognizable (unless those particular details were already known back when the thing was first posted, I imagine).
 
Yep, no snappy judgments at all, there...
Seriously, now...

Sorry, I accidentally left out the "In My Humble Opinion" before that. I never said that every aspect of the film including the writing would be a masterclass, based on such a limited sample.

Only that the footage shown has an intangible quality that I find so gripping, if just what we've seen was stretched to 2 hours long, I would not be disappointed. I think it has the potential to be far more than that, but I was just establishing my baseline.
 
It is easily my most anticipated film of the year, though there are still some things that irk me. For one, I have not seen any indication that Woola is in this movie. And I've poured over those high res screens of the murals on the wall.

curious to know if you have read any of the Barsoom novels after enjoying the movie so much.
 
The UK trailer has far less spoilers than the US one, which when I think about does actually seem to spoil the entire third act of the film, but lacks the 'punch' of the US trailer.

In fact the UK trailer arguably flows better but seems more generic to me. And getting to see more of Fassbender's synthetic is nice too. The blonde hair gives me a really interesting look.
 
The UK trailer has far less spoilers than the US one, which when I think about does actually seem to spoil the entire third act of the film, but lacks the 'punch' of the US trailer.

In fact the UK trailer arguably flows better but seems more generic to me. And getting to see more of Fassbender's synthetic is nice too. The blonde hair gives me a really interesting look.

Talking about blondes, I think Theron is going to nail the evil (?) suit character. Good vibes.



/Charlize fanboy
 
Or - and this is just a CARAZEH notion, the entire planet doesn't look the same as those couple of square kilometers we've seen.

You mean that this movie might not follow the single biome sci-fi trope of Dagobah, Hoth, Tatooine, etc.? Shocking. Although it IS still grey rocks. They're just shaped a bit different.
 
Only watched some of this because it looked like another one of those trailers that gives away too many surprises as it walks you through the whole damn movie.

Fuck you, trailers.
 
Or - and this is just a CARAZEH notion, the entire planet doesn't look the same as those couple of square kilometers we've seen.

Dude it's sci-fi. We know that means every planet is defined by one type environment; the desert planet, the forest planet, the ice planet. Clearly there's a weird alien Giger-esque planet and a normal rocky one. They can't overlap.
 
Has this been posted yet?

Director Ridley Scott, Writer Damon Lindelof and Michael Fassbender Talk PROMETHEUS at WonderCon 2012

Just the first part:

How much thought was put into the technology that’s in the film, especially with audience expectations being so much greater?

SCOTT: You think about everything, down to the shoe laces. We even had a big argument about the globular helmets. I was certain that I wanted the fully spherical glass helmet. In fact, in my research, I read this biography on Steve Jobs’ life and he talks about how he wanted to make his entire office of this glass, which is called Gorilla Glass, and this guy said, “We don’t make it anymore.” So, Steve Jobs actually then re-opened up the factory and started remaking Gorilla Glass. If I’m in 2083 and I’m going into space, why would I design a helmet that has blind spots. What I want is something where I have 360 [vision]. Glass, by then, will be light and you won’t be able to break it with a bullet.
 
HAHAHAHA

I didn't realize that was her.


I don't know. It makes sense, but they look like rather different planets in terms of geography.

rscottalienset01.jpg

A7A2z.jpg

I don't think it's supposed to be the same place. I think it would fit with what the script might be about:
basically, when an advanced alien species reaches the location they were "drawn to" by the master race, they get attacked and either wiped out or at least severely harmed, so what the Nostronomos crew found was just another ship wiped out by the aliens "weapon", not the same one we see in this movie. This whole alien race has been taken out by making the same mistake humans are about to make. It's like a virus that spreads to wherever the species in question has managed to space-travel to.
 
I might blame him for the dialogues (again, they really sound like the usual Lindelof crap), but the actual story is another matter: I realize he wasn't the first writer on board.

The 'spine' of the original story for Prometheus was a script called 'Alien Harvest' by a writer named Jon Spaihts who wrote an awesome script called Shadow 19. If you can find a PDF of Shadow 19 online I recommend reading it.

Alien Harvest was leaked onto the Internet years ago and was a 'hard sci-fi' tale that told the story of the space jockeys. IIRC it featured some pretty out there concept including
(apparently) two captured male humans who the Space Jockeys made have sex with each other
which I assume didn't make it to Prometheus.

Obviously FOX was never going to go for that so Lindelof was brought in to rewrite the story into something more palatable. I wouldn't be surprised if what is on screen in Prometheus is Spaihts original concept but heavily rewritten by Lindelof.
 
Hey, I'm speculating under the asumption that we actually got to see the ship's crash in that trailer.

For the record I hate that stupid single biodome BS that is so prevalent in sci-fi.
 
Hey, I'm speculating under the asumption that we actually got to see the ship's crash in that trailer.

For the record I hate that stupid single biodome BS that is so prevalent in sci-fi.

Yeah, it could be that there are multiple ships heading for Earth, and they take them all down in this movie. It does seem to imply that "they are going to Earth", as if there was many of them.

So maybe the space jockeys made a weapon (aliens), but since all the humans force the ships to crash, the weapons basically spills out and takes over and kills everything, including the jockeys, hence Alien 1.

But then that makes you wonder if the jockeys themselves are not a dormant weapon of sorts, waiting to be contacted by other species, to then go and wipe them out.

If so, it would leave the door open to another race behind everything.
 
lol i think the reason you guys don't ever like anything is because you always spoil it for yourselves...

i'll be treating this thread like kryptonite and trying to forget everything i saw in the trailer (i was too weak!)
 
Sorry, I accidentally left out the "In My Humble Opinion" before that. I never said that every aspect of the film including the writing would be a masterclass, based on such a limited sample.
You said the movie couldn't possibly disappoint, "not in any way that isn't minor quibbles".
If the writing or the story suck, is that a "minor quibble"? And aren't you arguing right now that you can't tell based on a couple of trailers? What gives?
So, if anything, the position you expressed in that post was actually more extreme than mine (I don't know whether or not the story will suck; right now, I'm annoyed that the trailers seem to contain elements of a stupid rumored synopsis).

Only that the footage shown has an intangible quality that I find so gripping, if just what we've seen was stretched to 2 hours long, I would not be disappointed. I think it has the potential to be far more than that, but I was just establishing my baseline.
The US trailer and its Inception-like fade to black annoyed me, but it looks good, sure. Thing is, my main issue with the current state of science fiction in US movies isn't the quality of the special effects...


The 'spine' of the original story for Prometheus was a script called 'Alien Harvest' by a writer named Jon Spaihts who wrote an awesome script called Shadow 19. If you can find a PDF of Shadow 19 online I recommend reading it.
I'll look for it, thanks.

Alien Harvest was leaked onto the Internet years ago and was a 'hard sci-fi' tale that told the story of the space jockeys. IIRC it featured some pretty out there concept including
(apparently) two captured male humans who the Space Jockeys made have sex with each other
which I assume didn't make it to Prometheus.

Obviously FOX was never going to go for that so Lindelof was brought in to rewrite the story into something more palatable. I wouldn't be surprised if what is on screen in Prometheus is Spaihts original concept but heavily rewritten by Lindelof.
More palatable -> Lindelof? ^__^;

I'd really like some "hard SF" movies, someday... Well, just something other than evil alien monsters and lasers instead of bullets, really.
What happened to Rama, anyway?
 
I'd really like some "hard SF" movies, someday... Well, just something other than evil alien monsters and lasers instead of bullets, really.
What happened to Rama, by the way?

The problem with hard (space based) sci-fi is that it's expensive to produce and it doesn't tend to attract a larger audience that would be needed to offset the budget etc.

But if Prometheus is a hit it would be a step in the right direction.

That Theron face is something you wouldn't mind seeing
under your bed sheets
every morning.

I'll be honest, I was expecting to find something horrific under that spoiler.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom