Wkd Box Office Est. 03•23-25•12 - audiences hungry for Games

Status
Not open for further replies.

xaosslug

Member
1.
EGFQ3.jpg
2.
wU5Fa.jpg
3.
u6Hu1.jpg
4.
E07NZ.jpg
5.
CZ7U5.jpg


rottenwatch box office:

o71uG.gif
86% The Hunger Games
YQcUA.gif
85% 21 Jump Street
i4vvm.gif
58% The Lorax
gSieA.gif
51% John Carter
eCYrd.gif
26% Act of Valor
-
-
kFX1r.gif
21% October Baby

metacritic box office:





*click pic(s) for source*

'Hunger Games' whammo worldwide with $214 mil. Lionsgate pic has third-highest Stateside opening ever with $155 mil

Worldwide audiences displayed a ravenous appetite this weekend for Lionsgate's "The Hunger Games," shelling out an astonishing $214 million worldwide, of which $155 million came from Stateside plexes, making it the third-highest three-day domestic debut ever.

Overseas, the film bowed in 67 day-and-date territories via local distribs, totaling $59.3 million. The film is projected to be No. 1 in virtually every market where it opened.

"Hunger Games" shattered several other notable benchmarks in North America: Pic stands as the highest non-summer domestic opening, beating "Alice in Wonderland," as well as became the all-time biggest debut for a non-sequel pic.

"Hunger Games" alone earned more than all films combined during the same frame last year, boosting this weekend's overall tally up a whopping 78%.

Many bizzers questioned how high the film could reach this weekend, citing early expectations as high as $115 million to $125 million.

But with unstoppable all-audience buzz, based on popularity for Suzanne Collins' bestselling trilogy, coupled with positive reviews and strong word-of-mouth, "Games" managed to outstrip even the most optimistic pre-weekend tracking predictions.

"We're now No. 3 among the top domestic openings -- the first being Warner Bros. and the third, Lionsgate. That's just mind-blowing," enthused Lionsgate marketing topper Tim Palen. "The fact that we didn't test the film or the trailer is a testament to Jon Feltheimer -- he has the best gut in the business."

Lionsgate distribution head David Spitz pointed to the film's miniscule 25% Friday-to-Saturday drop as a relatively unheard of achievement, especially given the film's record-setting $19.7 million midnight take lumped into Friday's gross. Typically, films with massive pre-release buzz that lead to hefty Thursday midnights, like the "Twilight" franchise, drop between 45% and 50% from Friday to Saturday.

"That positions us to be in the marketplace for a long time," Spitz said.

"Hunger Games," which received an A CinemaScore rating, drew a surprisingly robust male contingency, at 40%. That was likely boosted by a $10.6 million Imax share, since the mega-screen exhib caters mostly to male auds. Over-25 auds contributed 56% of the film's opening, while 44% came from moviegoers under 25.

Considering the weekend's "Hunger Games" frenzy, Sony's "21 Jump Street" held well in its second frame, down only 41%, for an estimated $21.3 million, while Universal's "The Lorax" followed with $13.1 million, off just 42%.

"Jump Street" has cumed a fantastic $71 million domestically. "Lorax," meanwhile, is still the year's highest-grossing Stateside release with $177 million -- that's until "Hunger Games" adds a few more daily tallies to its glut.​


*click pic for full list/source*
 
Superb performance for Hunger Games.

Nice to see 21 Jump Street is still doing good, haven't seen it but I hear it's hilarious.

:( @ John Bomba
 
Holy shit.

I've never even heard about The Hunger Games until a couple of weeks ago. What's up with that? Is this some Twilight like phenomenon?

21 Jump Street is holding on nicely. So is Lorax... it's been keeping place in the top 3 for over a month. That's something.

John Carter... lol
 
John Carter hasn't even made back the Hunger Games' budget. Oh Disney. Maybe you should focus on adapting more relevant and contemporary fiction?
 
Holy shit.

I've never even heard about The Hunger Games until a couple of weeks ago. What's up with that? Is this some Twilight like phenomenon?

I read the book summaries and it seems very bland imo... but I guess the teens/Twilight crowd love it.
 
It's definitely helped by the fact that its the first decent blockbuster of the year and its getting rave reviews. People wanna watch movies, but NOTHING has made a decent buzz all year.

Great movie too for men and women of all ages, unlike everyone trying to pigeonhole the movie into the "teenage-girls" category. It seems to have appealed to everyone.

EDIT: This is exactly what I'm talking about...
I read the book summaries and it seems very bland imo... but I guess the teens/Twilight crowd love it.
Where are you getting this considering 40% were males and over half the box office came from people over 25? It's a very backhanded and cheap way to mock the movie. Although the books might be popular amongst the "young adult" crowd, the movie has obviously appealed to everyone, and the trailers have been great. Men and women both wanna go out and watch this movie.

Personally, I've never read the books nor cared to; it's just the movie seemed appealing, the trailers looked good, and it got great reviews...what more do people want?
 
It's definitely helped by the fact that its the first decent blockbuster of the year and its getting rave reviews. People wanna watch movies, but NOTHING has made a decent buzz all year.

Great movie too for men and women of all ages, unlike everyone trying to pigeonhole the movie into the "teenage-girls" category. It seems to have appealed to everyone.

John Carter took that spot; just didn't have nowhere near the buzz of Hunger Games.

Anyways, I wonder how much DKR, Spiderman and Avengers are gonna make; should be a ton.
 
You guys are missing the big picture here: Will Act of Valor make more money than John Carter in the U.S. when it's all said and done?
 
I really need to get on with the hype. I still don't have any idea what Hunger Games is about but I know the books have something like +5000 reviews @ amazon and most of them positive. Should I read the books first or just go see the movie?
 
goddamn at the Hunger Games. If it did 30 million less it would still be a gigantic success. Jesus.

I had a feeling the male audiences wouldn't be driven off from the film (at least the first week) due to the superb marketing of making this film as less Twilight as possible.
 
Yeah he's betting the overall take.

The numbers are sure to be in the Hunger games favor.

This duel has just begun.

Eh... Hunger Games didn't do that great overseas though. Titanic is bound to do really well overseas.

I said this in the OT but if Lion King 3D can reach 94 million in the US for its rerelease, Titanic shouldn't have any problem surpassing that, especially with all the ads they've been running.
 
Eh... Hunger Games didn't do that great overseas though. Titanic is bound to do really well overseas.

I said this in the OT but if Lion King 3D can reach 94 million in the US for its rerelease, Titanic shouldn't have any problem surpassing that, especially with all the ads they've been running.

This cannot be!

Nooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
 
I read the book summaries and it seems very bland imo... but I guess the teens/Twilight crowd love it.

I'm thinking maybe I should write a book :P

The Last Harry Potter film and The Dark Knight are ahead of it iirc.

It beat Spider-Man 3 by 4 million. I just... WOW

It doesn't even have the advantage of 3D price tickets! So no one can claim for 3D price ticket advantage
 
This cannot be!

Nooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo

Titanic is also rereleasing at the time of the sinking's 100th anniversary, so that could help it as well. The film itself is definitely a different experience seen in the theater, so I think people will go see it again for that... along with people who never got a chance to see it in theater to begin with.
 
I really don't get the love for 'The Hunger Games'.
Young people get thrown together in an arena to a fight to the death. (Males Check)
Some sort of romantic triangle amongst the main cast (Females Check)
Jennifer Lawrence is beautiful and is a great actress (Star Quality Check)
Film is smartly directed and ample time is given to setup a world and backstory (Critics Check)
The movie is based off a popular book series and the trailers have been strong at setting up the movie and acquiring interest for those who don't know the book (Marketing Check)

What's not to get?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom