Family of Florida boy killed by Neighborhood Watch seeks arrest

Status
Not open for further replies.
Trayvon Martin marchers: 'We want an arrest. Shot in the chest'
More than a thousand protesters converged in the streets of Sanford, Fla., on Saturday to demand the arrest of neighborhood watch volunteer George Zimmerman in the shooting death of 17-year-old Trayvon Martin.

Civil-rights organizers from the NAACP and other groups kicked off the march at about 11 a.m. in one of the city's historic black neighborhoods; they proceeded from there to the Sanford police headquarters, the Orlando Sentinel reported.

The march is the latest in a series of demonstrations sparked by the Feb. 26 killing of the black teenager and the Police Department's subsequent refusal to press charges against Zimmerman.

The case has taken on racial overtones, drawing considerable national attention and sparking a sometimes-heated discourse about racism and selective policing. Martin was unarmed at the time of his death, and Zimmerman -- who told police he acted in self-defense -- has since gone into hiding.

On their way to police headquarters Saturday, protesters chanted: "We want an arrest. Shot in the chest."
http://www.latimes.com/news/nation/...rch-zimmerman-arrest-20120331,0,7779866.story
 
Uhh, wasn't the second picture Kosmo posted fake as well? Of the other Trayvon Martin on facebook?

Every site I've seen it on for the last week or so has stated it's real. The middle finger/shirtless one was the fake one being put all over. And as I said many pages ago when it was posted, it wouldn't matter if that one were real either. If it did, we'd have to kill a lot of people on facebook....
 
The case - no, absolutely not. As I have said, I don't think he should have been shot and Zimmerman should not have followed him.

What is does matter for is that we allow the media to play up a narrative that inflames things for the simple sake of ratings. You don't think they would love to cover some race riots this summer? They would fucking love it and cash those advertising checks.

I think what matters more is that you'd rather not hear about race from the media at all. Then you could pretend it's not an issue anymore.
 
fixed




The case - no, absolutely not. As I have said, I don't think he should have been shot and Zimmerman should not have followed him.

What is does matter for is that we allow the media to play up a narrative that inflames things for the simple sake of ratings. You don't think they would love to cover some race riots this summer? They would fucking love it and cash those advertising checks.


It is standard procedure in the media to display the pictures shown by the family of the deceased. This doesn't change because this case became national media.

It would've been dishonest journalism to go out and actively seek additional pictures upon reporting initially, because you leave the door open for the perception of bias.

George Zimmerman's picture was likely looked up in a record search because no other current picture was offered, or available. When a picture did become available, it was then shown.



I don't think there's any way a prosecutor pursues a first.*



*In before someone falsely makes an inference about what I think he should or shouldn't be charged with.


I don't think anyone in this thread is asking for a charge of first degree murder. That would be impossible to prove and isn't likely to be the appropriate charge. 2nd is entirely plausible, and pending any revelation of evidence in Zimmerman's favor, I think that should be the charge upon arrest.
 
Oh, is the bottom right one fake? Honestly, I haven't been following this circus with too close an eye. I do know one thing, the kid in the top right is not what Trayvon Martin looked like the night he got shot. That picture is at least 3 years old.

EDIT: Apologies, that is fake Trayvon. This is the real one:

trayvon-martin.jpg

Hahahaha you are incredibly transparent.
 
I'll ask again:

Thought question, and I'm not asking because I believe there is a trace of evidence that this is the case, but if internet detective work found say, a facebook discussion between trayvon and friends that they were robbing houses in that neighborhood, wouldn't it then be relevant under the test you just established for Zimmerman?

The question you raise and the conclusion you come to is based upon the results of the searches, not the validity of searching in the first place.
What exactly are you basing this hypothetical on and how is it relevant?
 
I think what matters more is that you'd rather not hear about race from the media at all. Then you could pretend it's not an issue anymore.

When race is clearly an issue, it needs to be talked about. When an incident occurs between a 17 year-old 6-foot black kid and an overzealous hispanic neighborhood watch guy who has no history of overt racism and all we see in the media is pictures of the victim when he was 12 and 14 and the shooter is continually called a "white hispanic", pardon me for questioning whether or not race is being unnecessarily injected into this.

I'm out, this thread is a joke. Let's hope Zimmerman is fully investigated and a trial takes place.
 
Every site I've seen it on for the last week or so has stated it's real. The middle finger/shirtless one was the fake one being put all over. And as I said many pages ago when it was posted, it wouldn't matter if that one were real either. If it did, we'd have to kill a lot of people on facebook....

Yeah, I would just find it amusing if he did it twice in a row.

I was going by the conversation back here, but it seems there was still some debate about it then.
 
When race is clearly an issue, it needs to be talked about. When an incident occurs between a 17 year-old 6-foot black kid and an overzealous hispanic neighborhood watch guy who has no history of overt racism and all we see in the media is pictures of the victim when he was 12 and 14 and the shooter is continually called a "white hispanic", pardon me for questioning whether or not race is being unnecessarily injected into this.

I'm out, this thread is a joke. Let's hope Zimmerman is fully investigated and a trial takes place.


No offense taken, and I realize that I'm spinning off into something else entirely which isn't what I thought would happen.

I'm going to bail out because now I'm getting into pointless shit.

j1bSGZy28Z9Zq.gif
 
I'll ask again:


What exactly are you basing this hypothetical on and how is it relevant?

Hypotheticals are generally made up fact patterns based on the desire to make inquiry into certain logical thought pursuits. Maybe you didn't read the 3-4 posts where I explained already what and why I was asking, or the post to which I was replying when I asked it, or the disclaimer within the post that you quoted itself. If that doesn't help you, I'm not sure what I can do there buddy.
 
When race is clearly an issue, it needs to be talked about. When an incident occurs between a 17 year-old 6-foot black kid and an overzealous hispanic neighborhood watch guy who has no history of overt racism and all we see in the media is pictures of the victim when he was 12 and 14 and the shooter is continually called a "white hispanic", pardon me for questioning whether or not race is being unnecessarily injected into this.

I'm out, this thread is a joke. Let's hope Zimmerman is fully investigated and a trial takes place.

Kosmo
Factually Challenged
(Today, 06:03 PM)

No, you're a joke. You've contributed absolutely nothing to this thread other than passive aggressive racism. It's a shame because you know you'd not be long for this forum if you truly displayed how you feel. It has to be a miserable internet existence to constantly suppress how you really feel, all for a forum for which you constantly have to jab and run to keep yourself from going over the edge.
 
When race is clearly an issue, it needs to be talked about. When an incident occurs between a 17 year-old 6-foot black kid and an overzealous hispanic neighborhood watch guy who has no history of overt racism and all we see in the media is pictures of the victim when he was 12 and 14 and the shooter is continually called a "white hispanic", pardon me for questioning whether or not race is being unnecessarily injected into this.

I'm out, this thread is a joke. Let's hope Zimmerman is fully investigated and a trial takes place.

He's got a year of overt racism on phone calls. Just because Zimmerman isn't mean-spirited or malicious doesn't mean he's got nothing against black people. He clearly thought any unfamiliar black person was a threat, which was the reason he called in Trayvon Martin. A broken inner sense of statistics does make him racist.

FYI, the media got those pictures from Trayvon's family. They didn't have to go looking for mugshots like they did for Zimmerman. Is that ethical, that they just take the family's campaign materials? Well look what happened when more enterprising sources tried to find their own pictures of Trayvon, that worked out splendidly didn't it.
 
Seems unnecessary now. Grand jury will hear the case in a week or so. The likelihood that they won't take this to a trial and let him walk free is low.

Grand juries can indict a ham sandwich, or do nothing at all, depending almost entirely on what the prosecutor presents and how he does it. It's actually a pretty scary system in many ways from the standpoint of the accused, and has been and often is serially abused against the poor and minority groups. You never know what the GJ will do though in high profile cases like this, and if FL is like other states with the sealed GJ process, unless we get a leak we might not know what happened if they fail to indict this guy.
 
It´s probably been asked before, i didn´t go trough all pages.. But why is this case getting so much attention? What did the family do right here?
 
He's got a year of overt racism on phone calls. Just because Zimmerman isn't mean-spirited or malicious doesn't mean he's got nothing against black people. He clearly thought any unfamiliar black person was a threat, which was the reason he called in Trayvon Martin. A broken inner sense of statistics does make him racist.

FYI, the media got those pictures from Trayvon's family. They didn't have to go looking for mugshots like they did for Zimmerman. Is that ethical, that they just take the family's campaign materials? Well look what happened when more enterprising sources tried to find their own pictures of Trayvon, that worked out splendidly didn't it.


Let's not use the picture that is available for zimmerman, let's put up a question mark and say that we have no available pictures of the accused.

i'm willing to bet that mugshot was the only photo available in which that could maintain an impartial stance as it was part of public record. It's not the media's fault Zimmerman's team waited this long in the game to provide a "better" photo of him.
 
It´s probably been asked before, i didn´t go trough all pages.. But why is this case getting so much attention? What did the family do right here?

The internet is pretty good at this kind of thing. Social media, as silly and hateful as it has also been with some of the fake trayvon and facebook nonsense we've seen in here, also played a huge role in getting major media coverage of this situation and keeping the story alive. Ten years ago it might have just been another case that never made the national media. Pretty neat how it's all worked out.
 
It´s probably been asked before, i didn´t go trough all pages.. But why is this case getting so much attention? What did the family do right here?
There was a very slow build, but when it took off, it took off. Dude killing an unarmed kid and not being arrested is going to attract attention.
 
Hypotheticals are generally made up fact patterns based on the desire to make inquiry into certain logical thought pursuits. Maybe you didn't read the 3-4 posts where I explained already what and why I was asking, or the post to which I was replying when I asked it, or the disclaimer within the post that you quoted itself. If that doesn't help you, I'm not sure what I can do there buddy.
You're right I missed your posts where you explained why you thought it was relevant but you didn't explain what you were basing the hypothetical of him robbing houses on. What evidence thus far gave any indication that he might be robbing houses?
 
You're right I missed your posts where you explained why you thought it was relevant but you didn't explain what you were basing the hypothetical of him robbing houses on. What evidence thus far gave any indication that he might be robbing houses?

Zimmermans bullet proof never changing testimony.
 
You're right I missed your posts where you explained why you thought it was relevant but you didn't explain what you were basing the hypothetical of him robbing houses on. What evidence thus far gave any indication that he might be robbing houses?

I'm not trying to be a jerk, but obviously you didn't read those posts, because I said there was not a single trace of any evidence that he did anything of the sort or "within light years" of it. This is why it was a hypothetical. This is why it was a thought experiment - what would the relevance be if someone found such evidence? How would/should people react? What might be the relevance for public opinion? For a court case?
 
What do you call spamming the most stereotypical picture of a black teen out of dozens available?
Contributing info to this thread? Tons of people posted pics of the guy and the victim. It's not the poster's fault if they took those kind of pictures. If those pics are shameful, embarassing, or whatever; blame whoever took them and whoever decided it was ok to pose for them and make them available online or to family members.
 
Kosmo
Factually Challenged
(Today, 06:03 PM)

No, you're a joke. You've contributed absolutely nothing to this thread other than passive aggressive racism. It's a shame because you know you'd not be long for this forum if you truly displayed how you feel. It has to be a miserable internet existence to constantly suppress how you really feel, all for a forum for which you constantly have to jab and run to keep yourself from going over the edge.
SoGood.gif
 
Gaffers accusing gaffers of being racist over petty shit all the time is highly annoying as well.

I guess you're not familiar enough with kosmos post history or this thread. If you are familiar with either and think that there was no sort of underlying message in that post, than that may speak to a bit of naivety on your part.
 
Contributing info to this thread? Tons of people posted pics of the guy and the victim. It's not the poster's fault if they took those kind of pictures. If those pics are shameful, embarassing, or whatever; blame whoever took them and whoever decided it was ok to pose for them and make them available online or to family members.

Why wouldn't it be ok to take them? He was a kid doing kid things. He had no idea he would be murdered and that people would use those pictures as an excuse to justify it.
 
You're right I missed your posts where you explained why you thought it was relevant but you didn't explain what you were basing the hypothetical of him robbing houses on. What evidence thus far gave any indication that he might be robbing houses?

I think the point was, if Trayvon Martin had a history of violence of criminal acts, would that have any relevance to this case. And to compare that to the relevance of George Zimmerman's history.

The answer is that Martin's history would only matter if Zimmerman was aware of it, or if Zimmerman can solidly establish that Martin initiated the confrontation. While Zimmerman's history is in play no matter what because the known evidence has Zimmerman pursuing Martin.
 
Gaffers accusing gaffers of being racist over petty shit all the time is highly annoying as well.

It's all the secret racist messages, and people hiding what they really feel. It needs to be called out, and then you call them a racist, just to be sure they know, that you know how they really feel, because of, you know, the secret racist messages that you can tell they really want to say.
 
When race is clearly an issue, it needs to be talked about. When an incident occurs between a 17 year-old 6-foot black kid and an overzealous hispanic neighborhood watch guy who has no history of overt racism and all we see in the media is pictures of the victim when he was 12 and 14 and the shooter is continually called a "white hispanic", pardon me for questioning whether or not race is being unnecessarily injected into this.

I'm out, this thread is a joke. Let's hope Zimmerman is fully investigated and a trial takes place.

I'm really trying to understand what you're getting at. It seems like you're trying to make this a "fair fight" by saying "Oh but he isn't racist!" A kid is dead and the killer is free. It stopped being fair there. You'll have to excuse people if they don't care how the media portrays a murderer.
 
Trayvon Martin shooting: It's not George Zimmerman crying for help on 911 recording, 2 experts say
A leading expert in the field of forensic voice identification sought to answer that question by analyzing the recordings for the Orlando Sentinel.

His result: It was not George Zimmerman who called for help.

Tom Owen, forensic consultant for Owen Forensic Services LLC and chair emeritus for the American Board of Recorded Evidence, used voice identification software to rule out Zimmerman. Another expert contacted by the Sentinel, utilizing different techniques, came to the same conclusion.

Zimmerman claims self-defense in the shooting and told police he was the one screaming for help. But these experts say the evidence tells a different story.
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/...-george-zimmerman-911-20120331,0,250481.story
Well there you go.
 
Kosmo
Factually Challenged
(Today, 06:03 PM)

No, you're a joke. You've contributed absolutely nothing to this thread other than passive aggressive racism. It's a shame because you know you'd not be long for this forum if you truly displayed how you feel. It has to be a miserable internet existence to constantly suppress how you really feel, all for a forum for which you constantly have to jab and run to keep yourself from going over the edge.
Wow so brutal but damn I cannot disagree. God that was good :D
 
I'm not trying to be a jerk, but obviously you didn't read those posts, because I said there was not a single trace of any evidence that he did anything of the sort or "within light years" of it. This is why it was a hypothetical. This is why it was a thought experiment - what would the relevance be if someone found such evidence? How would/should people react? What might be the relevance for public opinion? For a court case?
If there is not a single shred of evidence why chose that particular hypothetical.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom