I can prove it. Whoever was screaming, wasn't having their head bashed in on concrete or grass. There weren't any pauses or breaks, just a lot of screaming. If anyone was getting head trauma enough for them to fear death, they more than likely would have been losing consciousness.
Trayvon didn't have wounds to his head, neither did Zimmerman. as far as net-detectivtry goes. Now sure, we don't know any of this. So then lets just lock the thread, and not discuss anything until theres further evidence. Or, we can use our brains, personal experience, and common sense to know that Zimmermans ever-changing story and inconsistency are illustrating him as a liar. If anyone was betting money on whether or not Z was telling truth, absolutely no one here defending him would. But here, its good for a debate.
Eh, I could care less about the screaming. Whoever was screaming has nothing to do with what I was talking about. Trayvon could've EASILY been screaming AND bashing the other guy's head in (justifiably, I'd add- as in, self defense). And I can hit you in the head with something that won't show external head wounds but will be life-threatening.
I don't think Zimmerman is telling the truth and I think he's guilty of murder. That doesn't mean everything that he said was a lie and that doesn't mean that he's the devil. If a girl was raped and changed her story because she was afraid for her life (or something), you can bet a majority of people on here would be defending her. However, since it happens to be Zimmerman and Trayvon, a majority of people are defending the under 18 "child" without even considering that Zimmerman might not be guilty. When I post arguments, I'm posting them for the people who haven't really thought about the case before they made their decision.
Oh yeah and in before- Trayvon Martin Case Thread: George Zimmerman 'Defender' Cites Murder As Equal To Rape