Just jumping into the discussion (first post on GAF after a few weeks of regular lurking). I don't mean to interrupt anyone but I wanted to note that while I agree that Bolin did not do anything immoral, there was no way for the Equalists to have known that. Now, you're absolutely right that for someone to be found guilty there needs to be evidence, a fair trial, etc. However, given that you already implied that you were okay with the Equalist's brand of vigilantism against the Triads, I don't see how you can possibly demand that they take into account evidence. Yes, what happened to Bolin really sucks for him and as fans of the character we can feel bad for him. But if you're going to defend vigilantes, you can't turn around and apply a different standard just because a popular character got caught up in the middle of it.
Of course, if you disapprove of Amon's actions entirely that's another matter, but after reading the post I linked to I got the sense that you were somewhat accepting of Amon's actions against the Triads. My apologies if I misinterpreted what you said.
By this, I meant that if Benders are systematically abusing their power, they should have it taken away from them, or be otherwise stopped. I wasn't condoning his vigilantism, not exactly anyway, but I'm not condemning it either. No, I think they need to target the benders that are causing harm to nonbenders specifically. Doing that is perfectly fine. If they personally KNOW for sure who the guilty party are, it'd be right for them to stop them. However, this needs to be public evidence because otherwise you just have a persons word that the other guy was bad. Thus, this is the basic court process in a roundabout way. I don't think Vigilantism is bad exactly, but it's highly unstable. If the vigilante in question is legit, okay, but, as a society, how can we ever be sure of that? So, society laws must not allow it, but I don't think it's wrong by default.
Also, on a semi-related note, is there any indication that Amon has ever taken away the bending ability of someone who is not a violent criminal (or is affiliated with violent criminals)? There's no telling what's yet to come in the show, of course, so I'm not trying to justify Amon's cause. However, based on what we know, I'm going to refrain from condemning Amon too strongly. It's not clear yet that he's done anything to harm the ordinary, law-abiding benders of Republic City. I expect that to change in the coming episodes, although I really hope that Amon is given principles so he's a more interesting and sophisticated antagonist.
He hasn't done anything yet it seems, but he's made it clear that he has plans for Korra, from before she even arrived in the city. I doubt they're anything good.
Working with a gang is a bad idea. That's all I'm trying to say. Acting surprised because a gang got what's coming to them is ridiculous, even more so when you get caught up in it because you decided to work with them. And I disagree emphatically with the idea that he had no idea what the gangs were up to or what they were capable of. Bolin is not that stupid. He didn't want to because he knew the dangers and because his brother had specifically told him not to. If he knew they were in the right side of the moral equation he would've jumped to work for them in a heartbeat for that kind of money.
Again, your presuming on Bolin's intelligence. It's perfectly possible he is simply that ignorant. His brother clearly worked hard to keep him innocent. I agree that it's very odd that he would be so ignorant, but his mannerisms indicate it. Time will tell us for sure, but you have no reason to presume on Bolin's intelligence.
As for the rest, I'll agree to it. But who is saying that they're surprised? I don't think anyone didn't expect this exactly. What I'm saying is that it's wrong.