It's friggin cool. My only gripe is it doesn't have rubber seals to keep water out....
*NODS* Yup. All that shit is gonna rust.
It's friggin cool. My only gripe is it doesn't have rubber seals to keep water out....
I've watched neither since the first time I saw them in theater.
Going to be so fresh when I rewatch them.
I've watched neither since the first time I saw them in theater.
Going to be so fresh when I rewatch them.
Damn, dude. I don't hate his films at all. I just hate "realistic" Batman. The movies themselves are decent.
I don't get it. What's XD?
But a BB/TDK/TDKR showing all at once? Is that it?
Cause if it is, that's awesome
I don't get it. What's XD?
But a BB/TDK/TDKR showing all at once? Is that it?
Cause if it is, that's awesome
XD is the for smaller theaters to ride the success of IMAX. They're bigger than regular sized screens, but nowhere near the size of IMAX screens - but the tickets are priced similarly.
What's this marathon? I'm imagining you'll sit through Batman Begins, TDK and TDKR.
So the only non-digital IMAX theater around here that'll probably be showing the movie is a dome screen in a museum. This sounds like it'd be a terrible way to watch a Hollywood movie. Am I correct in this assumption?
Sweet deal. Should be a fun first IMAX experience.As long as you get one of the four backrows, it's awesome.
So the only non-digital IMAX theater around here that'll probably be showing the movie is a dome screen in a museum. This sounds like it'd be a terrible way to watch a Hollywood movie. Am I correct in this assumption?
Why do you hate that concept? Is it just because you think it limits Batman or...?
It limits the villians and the crazy shit in regards to the city.
Batman in the comics is actually embarrassing as hell. Pre-prep and "meditating" for an hour instead of a full nights rest? Never should touch celluloid.
Regarding the first statement, I can understand that perspective. I like the likes of Mr. Freeze and Croc and stuff as well. But a realistic batman still has merits as well, I think, as it makes the story more grounded. Truth of the matter is is that there are lots of ways to have batman. Dark and brooding vs lighthearted and fun, realistic vs outlandish, noble hero vs psychotic mess, etc.
As for the second statement, wtf? Where did that come from and what does that even mean?
So many writers have attached bullshit luggage and quirks to the character to keep giving him the upperhand. It's awful.
Speaking of Dragon Tattoo, I'm guessing Sony has abandoned the sequels after taking a loss? Hasn't been any chatter about them whatsoever.
I really wouldn't bother with James Woods.
I have no idea what you are trying to say.
So the only non-digital IMAX theater around here that'll probably be showing the movie is a dome screen in a museum. This sounds like it'd be a terrible way to watch a Hollywood movie. Am I correct in this assumption?
The character of Batman in modern comics is completely ridiculous and should never be put on film. There is so much awful tripe attached to him that when another film series is made I hope they don't include any of it. You know how Iron Man 3 follows a recent arc? I hope no Batman films do that.
I'm saying current Batman, the character and the attributes and even the events unfolding around him, are fucking stupid.
Are you aware that the films are in a completely seperate continuity from comics?
And there is no Iron Man 3 out yet.
Derp.Yes, holy shit yes.
The first and last Hollywood movie I watched at a domed Imax theater was Batman Begins. The ticket was expensive, the line was long as hell, and when we finally got in we had to sit on the aisle. I was lying on my back and turning my head side to side because I couldn't see the whole screen in my field of vision. After a while I just gave up and watched basically the left side of the screen unless there was nothing going on, in which case I'd turn my head.
I felt like crap, because I talked my coworkers into buying, waiting, and watching what I thought was the "definitive" version. Months later when it came out on dvd, I learned that you still couldn't figure out what the hell was going on onscreen during fights and action sequences, so I guess it wasn't all my fault.
I went it thinking it was going to be like one of the IMAX documentaries, that is, that the movie fills the entire screen. It turned out it was a very narrow band stretched across the middle of the screen.
Save your money.
SPOILER: Bane and Batman are on screen at the same time at some point in the movie.
That's why I said another film series.
SPOILER: Bane and Batman are on screen at the same time at some point in the movie.
...I am so confused. You said you want the batman movies to be in their own continuity because modern batman is ridiculous according to you. I say they are in their own continuity, seperate from others. You reply that another film series will do the same, which it will, I think all super hero movies have done. And I don't understand how this at all relates to the original question of how Nolan's realistic batman is a detrimental theme to the story.
Derp.
Except unlike Batman Begins, TDKR actually has over an hour of IMAX footage (the most for any commercially released film).
What is this prediction based on?I didn't say it was detrimental to the story. It just sucks as a fan of the villains. I think they're decent movies. I also was saying I don't want Batman, on film, to ever be as stupid as he is in the comics. I can see the next Batman series being closer to the source material.
Derp.How considerate, they've included rest periods for your neck.
front of bane's mask is missing
What is this prediction based on?
Derp.
You got a bad seat.
3/4 of the theatre were bad seats.
So, yes, if your going to be first in line and can sit in the very back row/middle seats or they offer reserved seating, I suppose I could see myself watching at a domed theater.