Horse Detective
Why the long case?
Got into a fight with a hunter and won.
th-this cannot be real
Looks like a cross between Ronaldinho, Barack Obama and Anthony Kiedis
The misspelling accents the misogyny quite nicely.
You've never had a sadnwich?
![]()
Why does the deer have a scar on his eye, was he hit with a sword?
I need to know before I can laugh. tyvm
Not funny, they died after that.
Wow....that was very very very bad and you should feel bad.
I'm with this guy.I don't care if the graffiti is good or bad, vandalism is vandalism.
I think you need to lighten up.
I don't care if the graffiti is good or bad, vandalism is vandalism.
This actually saddens me
I don't care if the graffiti is good or bad, vandalism is vandalism.
I think you should darken down!!!
I don't care if the graffiti is good or bad, vandalism is vandalism.
Graffiti isn't vandalism.I don't care if the graffiti is good or bad, vandalism is vandalism.
I don't care if the graffiti is good or bad, vandalism is vandalism.
I don't care if the graffiti is good or bad, vandalism is vandalism.
Graffiti isn't vandalism.
Vandalism is a deliberate attempt to destroy, graffiti isn't.
Also, murals like that one cannot really be done in hiding, so the owner of that property either commissioned it, was aware of it, or the property was abandoned.
p.s.
that picture is awesome.
LOL yeah try using your google "define vandalism" with a cop to avoid arrest.
You are very wrong. In Canada, graffiti is 100%, unarguably, vandalism.
Graffiti is vandalism (like my picture where I assume it was without consent).
No argue about it.
Graffiti is vandalism (like my picture where I assume it was without consent).
No argue about it.
Hmm, depends on the quality of the work and whether the wall it's on is public or not.
Plenty of graffiti artists are hired to legally create graffiti, how is that vandalism?
They are with consent then...
Plenty of graffiti artists are hired to legally create graffiti, how is that vandalism?
I would say that in this case they legally created art, not graffiti, which is inherently vandalism.
I´m confused. So you´re saying art is only art if it is legal?
I don't care if the graffiti is good or bad, vandalism is vandalism.
I´m confused. So you´re saying art is only art if it is legal?
So you're saying all graffiti is art?
I'm saying that if they are paid to do it, they are creating art in a graffiti-style, as opposed to simply creating graffiti, which is unasked-for art, i.e. vandalism. In most cases, graffiti is unwanted art or tags, creating high costs for those who must remove it.
EDIT: Go here bro.