Star Trek Into Darkness - Official poster revealed, teaser trailer now online

Status
Not open for further replies.
Is there a larger size available for this?!

center_bg.jpg
Click to expand...
 
Trailer attached with all prints of The Hobbit has been rated and is almost 2 minutes in length:
http://www.albertafilmratings.ca/recentclasstrailers.aspx

1 minute online exclusive trailer hits tomorrow!! Also interesting is the official Russian poster:
stidintl-ru-post-t.jpg


Apparently the direct translation is Star Trek: Vengeance which according to TrekMovie.com was one of the titles tested for all domestic and international markets but they went with Into Darkness. The Russian distributor said the Vengeance title is more appropriate given the film's content and only in Russia will the film keep the title Vengeance. More about it here:
http://trekmovie.com/2012/12/05/exc...-as-tested-title-for-star-trek-into-darkness/
 
Vengeance sounds much more badass than Into Darkness, but I think that's why I like Into Darkness so much more. It's not really an average title.
 
The first thing I think of when I see the busted up building in that poster is "that wreckage looks alot like the design of a Borg cube."

Obviously, it's not, but I wouldn't mind if we get bad-ass, non-queen-led Borg in Kirk's time period in a darker film in this universe.

Still, by this point didn't we pretty much know the entirety of the first film's plot? Seems like this one has been kept under wraps pretty damn well - could be a good or bad thing.

I'll say one thing though, there's always hype around the Star Trek villains (even when the TNG movies came out) and they hardly ever deliver in any meaningful or satisfying way just because the entire "good guy" cast is so large. It would be nice if they'd go back to something more like the ST:TMP or even ST4:Voyage Home, where there wasn't necessarily a central villain character, but a large insurmountable mystery and/or problem that had to be solved that wasn't necessarily some maniacal villain running amok.
 
teiresias said:
The first thing I think of when I see the busted up building in that poster is "that wreckage looks alot like the design of a Borg cube."

Obviously, it's not, but I wouldn't mind if we get bad-ass, non-queen-led Borg in Kirk's time period in a darker film in this universe.

Still, by this point didn't we pretty much know the entirety of the first film's plot? Seems like this one has been kept under wraps pretty damn well - could be a good or bad thing.

I'll say one thing though, there's always hype around the Star Trek villains (even when the TNG movies came out) and they hardly ever deliver in any meaningful or satisfying way just because the entire "good guy" cast is so large. It would be nice if they'd go back to something more like the ST:TMP or even ST4:Voyage Home, where there wasn't necessarily a central villain character, but a large insurmountable mystery and/or problem that had to be solved that wasn't necessarily some maniacal villain running amok.
Click to expand...

Absolutely agree with this. The writers have been intent on making "this generations Khan" for quite some time and they screw up a potentially good movie every time they tried. Hell they've been screwing it up in the James Bond movies lately too.
 
Okay, going to try something new for a while. If there are updates of a new movie which could be of interest to a larger segment of the forum who might not be subscribing to some old-ass thread, if that thread is bumped the thread will be locked. :)
 
I accidentally made my second thread. lol
Anyways, I'm beyond excited for the teaser. I watched the original one again yesterday out of hype.
 
MrCunningham said:
I wanted to like J.J. Abrams' Trek, but I couldn't get into it. I don't know, it didn't really do anything for me, and I wouldn't place it as one of my favorite Trek movies in the series. It felt more like a Star Wars inspired adventure movie with thinly layered science fiction elements that took a back seat to the action set pieces. I didn't care for the villain, and the plot had too many "destined to be together by fate" moments in it. I didn't hate it either, but I hope that I enjoy Abrams' second Trek outing more than his first one.
Click to expand...

I wanted to like it but had no problems sentencing them all to death and pulling the switch myself every time.
 
The teaser is playing in front of The Hobbit here next week. We'll probably get the trailer in at work. I might have a sneaky watch before it plays with Hobbit. Same deal with the new Man Of Steel trailer.

Source: I'm a projectionist

Life's OK
 
Router said:
On TV try called him a "one man weapon" so I guess that confirms its Mitchell?
Click to expand...

Seems to be the safest bet. Have the TOS like mitchell play out in the comics to throw people off then surprise Pissed off god Mitchell shows up for movie
 
Barely feels like Star Trek. There was a quick shot of the Enterprise, no space, looks like it's mostly set on Earth.
 
Looked pretty good. Not sure about the visuals, some of the effects didn't look great yet, maybe just unfinished. Voiceover was well done, what little plot shown seems pedestrian but hopefully there is something deeper to it than rage, vengeance and so on.

Knows nothing about Star Trek.
 
Looks like a fun sci-fi action movie to me. Of course, I've never been a huge Trek fan, and really enjoyed the last one. Cumberbatch's voice is awesome.
 
Darklord said:
Barely feels like Star Trek. There was a quick shot of the Enterprise, no space, looks like it's mostly set on Earth.
Click to expand...

So basically, you want a ton of corridor shots, a few holodeck scenes and perhaps a ship or two destroyed on the screen on the bridge?
 
He "returned". Gary Mitchell hasn't happened in JJ Trek so it can't be him IMO.

I feel really strongly now that it is Khan or another of his Supermen. If Khan was in cryostasis and was awoken, he was gone for a while so he can actually "return" for vengeance. They are really ambiguous with what they show, clearly trying to get fans to think it could still go either way. The villain is shown leaping with some kind of weapons on his arms. If he was Gary Mitchell, he wouldn't need weapons. Also, Kirk and Spock wouldn't be able to get into a fist fight with Mitchell, so that further lends evidence to support a Supermen villain.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

Astartes II – Official Teaser Trailer
1
485
Apocryphon replied
HIM | Official Teaser Trailer (Sports Horror Film)
5
474
StueyDuck replied
Star Trek: Section 31 Trailer
2
86
4K
Captain Zyrain replied
Now You See Me: Now You Don’t (2025) Official Trailer
32
485
Come On Tars replied
Section 31 Rottenwatch: Kurtzman makes a worse Star Trek movie than Into Darkness, Nemesis, and Final Frontier combined
2
93
5K
Fluffytheterrible replied
Top Bottom