You never know with the supposed 3rd party Wii U oriented presentation Iwata hinted at, at the end of his ND presentation.
Nintendo paid Sqaure to make Versus XIII Wii U exclusive? :O
You never know with the supposed 3rd party Wii U oriented presentation Iwata hinted at, at the end of his ND presentation.
GILGAMESH for smash believe!
The world and FF fans all over care about what you asked for.
Come on, an airship? That's every FF game.. how bout something new? That's fine if you really want that but this is a solitary dude in a rocking mech, not an entire party needing to go on adventures around the world.
Give me a reason to expect VsXIII to not turn to shit when they couldn't even manage to make a decent console game in forever, as they say "you're only as good as your last game"
A full blown conniption? That's a huge exaggeration. I just think you're finding mundane details in order to have something to criticize.
You never know with the supposed 3rd party Wii U oriented presentation Iwata hinted at, at the end of his ND presentation.
not going to hold my breathe Square Enix totally hates money
Not running over, flying over.
![]()
If you don't want to get Versus, I really couldn't care less. Don't buy it then, it's not my job to sell you on it.
How many games has Monolith developed in those 7 years? How many has Square and on how many platforms?
For Monolith Soft to pull out an amazing looking game like this with potential multiplayer, while Square Enix takes 7+ fucking years to develop a SINGLE player game? Yeah. Square Enix really shot themselves in the foot.
Not only that, but if X is multiplayer w/ no sub fee... then all that money will likely have gone to waste with XIV 2.0.
If you don't want to get Versus, I really couldn't care less. Don't buy it then, it's not my job to sell you on it.
It's a discussion of which game looks better. Why is that mundane to mention the animations of all the characters and monsters? It's kind of a key part of the game. Admiring rocks and mountains that look arguably better or around the exact same looks fairly mundane to me, but everyone in this thread is doing that.
If you don't personally care about animations, that's fine. Why are you arguing with me about it then?
So you accuse me of shitting on SquareEnix and then you give no reason why one shouldn't when they actually deserve it?
I guess you should find something substantive to criticize or go home.
If you didn't care Shinta, you wouldn't be dignifying others with a retort.
wut lol
Skyrim looks a lot better than Versus. It's hard to look at any of Versus's environments and not come away unimpressed.
The difference being that pretty much all Final Fantasy games are very different from each other. XII doesn't play like Type-0 which doesn't play like Dissidia which doesn't play like XIV which doesn't play like Crystal Chronicles: Ring of Fates. Giving them the name Final Fantasy is simply a marketing trick, it automatically gives the game visibility whereas games like The World Ends With You end up being ignored by many who'd probably enjoy it, despite it being better than a lot of FF games.I agree, but in this generation, that seems impossible. It's not just square, its all of the major publishers that over expose their franchises. It's especially painful coming from their playstation and snes days, where they just made high quality games left and right like it was going out of style. And the majority of them weren't final fantasy titles.
Actually deserve what? I enjoy their games a lot, and I think Versus looks great. This whole conversation has been about me saying Versus has substantially better animations. It also looks much better in general, as far as character models, art design, character design, spell effects, combat system, music, story.
If you don't agree, I honestly, truly, supremely don't care.
The difference being that pretty much all Final Fantasy games are very different from each other. XII doesn't play like Type-0 which doesn't play like Dissidia which doesn't play like XIV which doesn't play like Crystal Chronicles: Ring of Fates. Giving them the name Final Fantasy is simply a marketing trick, it automatically gives the game visibility whereas games like The World Ends With You end up being ignored by many who'd probably enjoy it, despite it being better than a lot of FF games.
I'd understand the bitching about SQEX relying on Final Fantasy if they were like the Call of Duty series or something, but as they are all so vastly different... Besides, they've had some (good) new IPs in the last few years (The Last Remnant, TWEWY, Bravely Default), they simply haven't been successful enough to encourage a shitton more of original IP development. The reason why they dropped the number of new IPs is pretty clear when they saw awesome games like Vagrant Story selling maybe two copies outside Japan while some much worse FF spin-offs sold like gangbusters (at least in comparison).
Caring what they think, and letting buffoons get the last word are two entirely different things.
I actually am late now though, so have it at gentlemen. You have the floor. Don't kill too many brain cells.
Your insults are getting tiresome though.
You're literally throwing everything and nothing at this argument.
I mean we don't even have words about story or anything and magically Vs is better?
We don't have anything as far as music and AGAIN you claim it's better?
You're a joke poster that's for sure.
And funny how when your opinion doesn't match its "like your opnion man"
but yours need to be treated like some word from god.
''Let's just release a trailer showing a guy entering a flying robot, I'm sure the nerds will have a meltdown thinking it's the best thing ever and immediately take out their wallets''
Haha?''Let's just release a trailer showing a guy entering a flying robot, I'm sure the nerds will have a meltdown thinking it's the best thing ever and immediately take out their wallets''
How many games has Monolith developed in those 7 years?
I agree, games never need trailers.
Shouldn't the argument be nintendo vs square? Even though mono made a great game compared to square in the last fucking decade, i think a publisher vs publisher should be more appropriate.
So no contest then? Ok mods, close this thread.Pokemon.
Shouldn't the argument be nintendo vs square? Even though mono made a great game compared to square in the last fucking decade, i think a publisher vs publisher should be more appropriate.
Trailers have release dates.
Did Nintendo release trailers with release dates? Nope, they basically know the sheep will get excited anyway.
Wait are they actually gonna have a conference in February? I thought that was just a fake internet rumor.They hate me too. With the whole BDFF situation. I hope their February conference changes my mind in that regard.
Say whaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaat?Skyrim looks a lot better than Versus. It's hard to look at any of Versus's environments and not come away unimpressed.
Shouldn't the argument be nintendo vs square? Even though mono made a great game compared to square in the last fucking decade, i think a publisher vs publisher should be more appropriate.
Trailers have release dates.
Did Nintendo release trailers with release dates? Nope, they basically know the sheep will get excited anyway.
Wait are they actually gonna have a conference in February? I thought that was just a fake internet rumor.
Just ignore this post folks. Pretty sure the dude doesn't know what he/she is talking about.Trailers have release dates.
Did Nintendo release trailers with release dates? Nope, they basically know the sheep will get excited anyway.
Square is a primarily roleplaying publisher though, and Nintendo has lots of different genres. It's like comparing apples and oranges.
SquareEnix also isn't limited to games, they publish stuffs too (Gangan is them, right?)
They have these bi-annual conferences for stuff including western plans.
Last one was in December.
Not to mention you can't drive the ones that are there post FF9.Every FF game? Crystal Chronicles? Dirge? XIII series?
Really? I never knew that. I presume it's a fairly behind the closed doors affair with a press statement released at the end of it?
not to mention you can't drive the ones that are there post FF9.
Just ignore this post folks. Pretty sure the dude doesn't know what he/she is talking about.
Yeah. But those are generally Japan only. Much like every Ultimania in existence.
Ohh jackpot, did I hurt your feelings? *Baah*
Good point although I remember the music part trying to expand internationally but that's probably my shitty memory.
Ohh jackpot, did I hurt your feelings? *Baah*
They have their concerts in certain locations and albums available to buy, but that's the most that the other hemisphere usually can have access to, and that's if you pay attention.
So are you trying to talk about the game/topic or are you just in here to make passive-aggressive statements and derail the thread with "Nintendo sheep" crap?
A friend went to see the one from last week or so in Paris....yeah you really need to know for that...
Too bad their cinema venture was so misguided, they really do some sweet CG
Cool, will be on the lookout for it info about it, in that case. Square really has a very barren line-up in the west and east this year.It is, but one insider or so he says is able to attend these meetings. He generally doesn't reveal much but he is so far trustworthy.
Cool, will be on the lookout for it info about it, in that case. Square really has a very barren line-up in the west and east this year.
is not a fair question.. Monolith Soft is a small company of 92 people divided in 3 teams... plus they never got great budget from Nintendo.. Probably that will change with X
Square Enix is a giant..
How many games has Monolith developed in those 7 years? How many has Square and on how many platforms?
It frightens me to think how much money has been dumped into 14.
A subscription based MMO that failed, got shutdown, retooled and will be relaunched?
No one even cares anymore.
=(
is not a fair question.. Monolith Soft is a small company of 92 people divided in 3 teams... plus they never got great budgets from Nintendo.. Probably that will change with X
Square Enix is a giant..
First, research every article about Versus Info, then watch every trailer, also realize that it's being done by a different team and then you will see that Versus will be NOTHING like FF13.
The only connection is the vague crystal theme and the name.
I suspect 2013 will be a shitty year for Square. At least IMO.
2014 might be different.