Nintendo ditches main E3 conference, still there with games, press events, N-Direct

But where will I hype train? I can't get hyped for the nextbox or the ps4! It's not the same level of hype.

Hype for the Nintendo Direct E3 special. It will almost certainly be more exciting than what they did last year.
 
The data isnt the point though. In a year when 2 huge companies release new hardware with guns blazing, you dont go experimenting with skipping a big press event at the biggest game show.. But it fits in the list of mind boggling decisions that Iwatas replacement hopefully reverses.

Except you will literally get the same exact information from these smaller events as you would in a main one. Plus, you won't have to wade through things like sales figures.
 
I don't see a difference. Instead of seeing something highly scripted on stage in the E3 streams this summer, I'll see highly scripted ND's in the streams instead. It's not like they're going to do them at 5 am EST, so besides the lack of stage, I don't see the big deal. In fact, letting the media get very hands on with the games right away could work very much in their favour. The gamers still see the stuff, the media get more of a hands on and I don't have to sit through sales wankery for 5-10 minuets.
 
This is a very good point. Nintendo rented this little thing called the freaking Kodak theater, which also hosts the oscars, for their latest events, they placed their bet on big and live and if they move away from that they obviously have a reason to.
I think they only hosted the conference at the Kodak theater two or so times, they've been moving towards smaller venues for the past few years (Nokia theatre iirc).
 
So... no press conference GIFs :(

Never forget.

1IYM.gif
 
It's hard to find all the titles at E3 by walking the show floor. A company's press conference serves to give you an idea of the main headliners to look for. It also serves as a grandstand for you to boast and draw attention AWAY from other companies.

Not just for gamers and the press, but DEVELOPERS, PUBLISHERS, and RETAILERS. You know, the people you get your games FROM. E3 is where places like Target, Wal-Mart and Gamestop (Aside from Gamestop's own annual party in Texas) talk to companies about what to order, stock and such.

If a Nintendo Direct was enough to work around E3 time, then they'd just make a Nintendo Direct the same week as E3. They chose not to. Or maybe it's because out of desperation with the last two Directs they don't have enough to show to fill 45 minutes.

Or maybe it's because their usual presenter, Reggie, is on his way out.

Or maybe they saw the futility in trying to compete with the new juggernauts.
Heck, all Sony and Microsoft need to do is show a 2 minute trailer and publish a pdf with the specs on it with launch date and price.

A user said this in another thread, but I think the pre-E3 conferences simply communicate the marketing and messaging strategy for the coming year.

But you can do that, and everything you discussed, without renting out the Nokia Theater. And I think this starts to paint a huge picture about how Nintendo wants to market going forward. It's not the complete picture, of course. We'll have to wait until June to see that.
 
I think that they don't have much to talk about, so no conference saves money and allows them the luxury of being low key. I hope people set their expectations properly. At least the 3DS has a ton of games coming.
 
"Fuck you gaming press.

You ignored us when we were completely dominating everyone else in the industry with the TWO top platforms, and now we've curated a forum of direct contact with he public, getting them the same PR content without your immaturity, dissmissiveness, and sponsored Microsoft ads all over the page".
 
I guess this way they can avoid doing it live and do several takes until whatever news doesn't come off as flat as last year

But it's still a horrible decision
 
I'd like to get the info on who buys a freaking 10k dollar car based on a 30 second ad, but for some reason advertisers still pay tons of money on advertisements.

Guess what, advertising is fucking tough, which is why its so strange that they would give up any ground at all on it.

First, they aren't giving up any ground. They're changing the presentation. Neither you or I know what that entails in the long run, but looking at it logically, the people this matters to won't be impacted at all.

Secondly, I don't know what your comparison has to do with anything at all. Why even bother with E3 then? It would make the most sense to just spend that E3 money on advertisements and getting the WiiU on every talk show imaginable.
 
If E3 is so pivotal, why have both Microsoft and Sony abandoned it for their hardware announcements?
I don't know why people keep insisting on somehow giant massive events revealing the new hardware from Sony and Microsoft at E3 when they had done (or are going to do) those big announcements outside of E3.

There is not going to be a big Sony reveal of the PS4 simply because it already happened.
Why are people assuming that because Sony and Microsoft held or are holding separate announcement events that E3 isn't still a pivotal part of their announcement and unveiling strategies?

They will hold some cards to reveal there as they gradually try and define the narrative around their product launches. As they will for GamesCom and TGS, well the latter maybe only for Sony.
 
I think that they don't have much to talk about, so no conference saves money and allows them the luxury of being low key. I hope people set their expectations properly. At least the 3DS has a ton of games coming.

Seems like they have a lot of software to show off. An hour full of sizzle reels and trailers probably isn't worth renting out a gigantic theater. Small events will get similar media coverage and get you an intimate audience with people you need to impress.
 
This is really anti climatic, the one year they have games to show (and this is, at the end of the day, all about games) they chose not to?

Having Mario Kart, SSB, Zelda, Mario 3D and others finally up on stage would have been great way to change the perception of the Wii U to something more positive.
 
Earlier this week, I posted a recommandation about skipping the traditional E3 conference format, and focus on short clips that could serve as Nintendo ads for the rest of the year.

Halfway there :)
 
It'll be weird not having a Nintendo conference, but it'll be interesting to see how this goes.

E3 conferences have been pretty dull of late anyway. Though, I suppose it could be said that watching a press conference for entertainment is a bit silly.

The real victims cause Nintendo always got classy but hot ones :(

Aw man, did they ever. Remember the 3DS reveal? Beauty and class all the way.
 
In pretty typical fashion, looks like gamers don't like change!

This is a bold cost effective and smart move given the success of the nintendo directs. It is beyond me as to why people are viewing this as a fail.

They have solid data to back up that doing directly targeted video presentations will be just as if not more effective than the traditional conferences.

People always talk about these conferences as if they ultimately determine the success of a console.

The only things these conferences contributed to was the egos of fanboys. Just look at the whole silly thing of "rating" conferences. It's all pointless at the end of the day.
 
Why not both? That way hardcore Nintendo fans get their yearly shot of hype. I need it :(
And the only way to satisfy your hype is to have a 1-hour conference? What's wrong with a 1-hour Nintendo Direct? (Though I'm not sure if that's what they'll use instead)

Nintendo's conferences haven't been above average lately anyway. The last decent ones were 2009 and 2010. I'm glad they're trying something different; a more intimate approach.
 
Nintendo directs are the reason nobody is buying a WiiU; this is a fact. If they announce the same information in a press conference the WiiU will magically start selling way better; this is also a fact. Just look at how Sony announced the PS3: in a press conference, and people bought it in droves. Because E3 press conferences and their perception are what drive the video game industry. Just look at the conference where Microsoft revealed Kinect and how gamers laughed and laughed at how stupid it was, and nobody bought Kinect and it was a huge failure.
 
No conference? D:

This seems like a really bad idea, stand up and be counted for Nintendo! I'm sure this will really help in generating mindshare for the WiiU against PS4/NextBox -_-
 
This is really anti climatic, the one year they have games to show (and this is, at the end of the day, all about games) they chose not to?

Having Mario Kart, SSB, Zelda, Mario 3D and others finally up on stage would have been great way to change the perception of the Wii U to something more positive.

they will be showing games. they are having smaller events all throughout E3 instead of one big conference.
 
And the only way to satisfy your hype is to have a 1-hour conference? What's wrong with a 1-hour Nintendo Direct?

Nintendo's conferences haven't been above average lately anyway. The last decent ones were 2009 and 2010. I'm glad they're trying something different; a more intimate approach.

A live event is 10 times more exciting imo.
 
Well, we get the same information.

Press conferences are great because of the lulz, but the important part are the games/information which we'll get anyway, so I'm fine.
 
Honestly, I fell like the press has been shitting on Nintendo for so long that Nintendo just decided to forego it this time. I don't think it is Nintendo admitting defeat, I just think that they rather do it their own way.

Same thing with Microsoft not coming out with info with the new Xbox yet.

Same thing with Sony getting out in front and showing the PS4 off.
 
I can see both sides of the coin here. You have to think that Nintendo looked into the pros and cons of this decision before making it. I thought Nintendo would head this way after Nintendo Directs upstaged what was delivered to those of us sitting in the Nokia Theater last year. All those announcements we were waiting for? Those came later, on Nintendo's own terms.

If Directs are going to be Nintendo's main communication vehicle, that's great for them. I do have doubts about press outside of the gaming sector taking any interest in them-- or much interest in what Nintendo will deliver in a more subdued and intimate fashion-- but many believe that mainstream media simply isn't vital to potential success for Nintendo.

I know that if I was Satoru Iwata, I would have held the event anyway and used it to re-roll the Wii U and cement the idea that 3DS is making proper strides forward. But I don't run a company worth billions. He knows the risks and potential rewards with this bold strategy. All we can do is see what effect it has on sales over the next 8-12 months.
 
I honestly am not going to mind, as long as I get the exciting trailers and footage of brand new games and whatnot.

Though I'm going to miss how grand the conferences were; the 3DS reveal was just SO good...
 
No conference? D:

This seems like a really bad idea, stand up and be counted for Nintendo! I'm sure this will really help in generating mindshare for the WiiU against PS4/NextBox -_-

If Nintendo has the same amount of space on that they normally have, journalist aren't going to care. And if they have software to announce, gamers aren't going to care.

It probably won't really matter. It's a new marketing strategy when they desperately need new marketing strategies, so we'll see if it pays off.
 
I think the first mistake you can make is assuming This is a reactionary move.

They've been moving toward this for a long time.

This is the equivalent of saying that the reason Nintendo generally doesn't attend the Tokyo Game Show is because they can't compete! Space world and after, their fall conferences were them hiding from the competition even when they were in first place!

Basically, there is just this weird venom waiting to escape at the release of any Nintendo news, no matter how neutral, for who knows what reason.

It IS a reactionary move though. It's just not a reaction only due to new consoles but also their past missteps at E3. If they felt they were successful at E3 they would have kept doing it. I mean let's face it, NDs are aimed specifically at Nintendo gamers. Events like E3/GC/TGS are great opportunities to reach out to different audiences outside of the Nintendo core as these events will have a lot of media attention on them. Given the wiiu situation a kick ass E3 would have been great. But new hardware almost always have the most attention on them..and this year we have two

Not sure if the venom remark was aimed at me or not tbh since I am actually saying this is a good move. Their last two E3s were pretty weak and their NDs have been met with a lot of success. No need to be so defensive

I do think they should come to E3 again next year. It'll be a wasted opportunity if they didn't
 
Nintendo directs are the reason nobody is buying a WiiU; this is a fact. If they announce the same information in a press conference the WiiU will magically start selling way better; this is also a fact. Just look at how Sony announced the PS3: in a press conference, and people bought it in droves. Because E3 press conferences and their perception are what drive the video game industry. Just look at the conference where Microsoft revealed Kinect and how gamers laughed and laughed at how stupid it was, and nobody bought Kinect and it was a huge failure.

Not sure if serious....
 
but many believe that mainstream media simply isn't vital to potential success for Nintendo.
Which seems odd, considering those new ads, for example, and some of the comments from the investor briefing, would suggest Nintendo is doubling down on targeting families and/or expanded audiences to try and turn the Wii U around.

There are little things that have struck me as odd with the approach to Wii U from a marketing perspective, e.g. why wasn't the Wii U among Ellen's give-aways at Christmas? Instead it was all Kinect, Move and Vita.
 
First, they aren't giving up any ground. They're changing the presentation. Neither you or I know what that entails in the long run, but looking at it logically, the people this matters to won't be impacted at all.

Secondly, I don't know what your comparison has to do with anything at all. Why even bother with E3 then? It would make the most sense to just spend that E3 money on advertisements and getting the WiiU on every talk show imaginable.

E3 press conferences are advertisements and marketing. It's just the type where people don't really look at it as an advertisement and are actually interested in what's going on.
 
Top Bottom