BojTrek said:Still one of my favorite trilogies...
John Dunbar said:It is my favourite trilogy after Lord of the Rings.
Not counting Indiana Jones, since that won't be a trilogy for long.
ImperialConquest said:OKAY FOLKS, LITTLE HELP:
I've only seen the first movie, but I really liked. I only saw a couple of months back on Bluray. I don't know why I waited so long, since I like J.Depp movies and all..
Anyway, my wife has seen the frst and second parts and ansolutely loves them both.
So, should I buy the complete set in Bluray? Is one even out? I've seen the first two at the store.. but is a box set out for Bluray?
If so, would it be worth buying?
yacobod said:the movies really drop off after the 1st one, but the PQ/AQ is great so id recommend picking them all up, but the 2nd and 3rd movies are pretty disappointing compared to the 1st
probune said:God damn is your tag appropriate.
CajoleJuice said:POTC3 was the worst movie I saw this summer.
But didn't see Spider-Man 3.
Yea, that's what I figured. :lolAnasui Kishibe said:and that's why
one was good, two was mediocre ( i found it hard to watch a second time).. three was just a mess.DevelopmentArrested said:Pirates 3 was awful.
One was the one good one of the bunch, IMO.
YYZ said:shame, could've been a decent franchise since it was known to be a trilogy. I never "got" these movies anyway, although 1 was enjoyable. 2 and 3 confused me to no end, a bunch of twisted stuff. Maybe I'd appreciate it more if I spent a day just watching all three in a row (not on DVD though).
Linkzg said:however, if they make Shrew 4, I would seriously be ticked off, the Shrek movies suck ass.
omg rite said:What? The first two are awesome.
I'm pretty sure they were both critically acclaimed too.
But 3 was pretty lame.
And you're gonna be mad, as they planned 3 + 4 after 2 came out.
fistfulofmetal said:It was big, dumb, convoluted, hard to follow, and silly.
But it was fun.
I swear to god that some of you have some of the worst tastes in movies ever!!!!SofaKing said:At World's End >> Dead Man's Chest, but still not worth rushing out to buy
Linkzg said:but the third was the worst movie of 2007....
omg rite said:How many movies did you see?
Yea, Shrek 3 was pretty dreadful, particularly if you've already seen the other 2. Rehash total.Linkzg said:a lot.
Name one you thought was worse than Shrek 3 and I might consider it better. Shrek 3 was seriously the worst time I spent in a movie theater in a long time, unlike Spiderman 3 which was funny in a bad way, Shrek 3 was just shit bad. I feel bad for those that payed to see the movie, I only went because there was a deal going on.
actually it didn't, I just hastily wrote that. I have no idea what happened in 2 so I was lost in 3. I just bundled them together.omg rite said:How in the world did 2 confuse you?
I understand 3 completely, but 2 was really simply to follow.
i'm so glad this was the 2nd post of this thread. QFT.Defcon said:Horrible movie, though.
suzu said:I liked the 1st one. 2nd was decent, 3rd was pretty terrible but eh. I didn't expect much so I had fun watching them.
I have not watched Spiderman 3 yet... kinda afraid to after hearing everybody say it's shit, lol.
I thought it was the best in the trilogy, easily. Rousing finale, unexpected (and to me, unexpectedly moving) end to the Elizabeth story arc.ant1532 said:Although a lot of people didn't like it and though it was just average I thought it was amazing and awesome.