plagiarize
Banned
<JaggedSac> Thanks gamers for ruining it for me![]()
They need to let it go. When consumers unite over something, the gaming press don't mean shit.
#dealwithit
<JaggedSac> Thanks gamers for ruining it for me![]()
Lee Hutchison is a sharp guy and writes neat, informative pieces for Ars. Check out his Web Served series on setting up a personal web server.
I don't really disagree with him either, console gamers really need to chill.
He is not altogether incorrect, there's not a 1:1 correlation or anything, but without a good start, it's unlikely you are going to be a competitor.
Of course, that they felt the need to run damage control on whether people were "looking into" those PS4 numbers says it all - once again, it's a service against how shitty and dumb they perceive their audience to be, not a service any one actually needs in their readership (unless they're fanboys). It's straight up for their masters.
Who are their masters?
Who are their masters?
I agree with this. Usually I agree with the general consensus of GAF but it's too early to tell how well the PS4 will do. I hope it does well or I will be concerned about the future of my hobby.I don't see why people are so upset about this article. It is simply pointing out there is a low correlation between initial sales and final sales. It is a valid point. It is the best article? No, but that is hardly a reason to get upset. At this point I wouldn't be surprised if Microsoft was benefiting from an anti-Sony fanboy bias. The Sony defense force is a little ridiculous right now.
And to the people pointing out the difference between 24 hours and the first week, it is completely irrelevant when you sell out of 95%+ of your launch stock in day one. You rarely see replenishment stock until the following week. They are essentially the same thing. I'd be really surprised if Sony made an announcement of week 1 sales because it is unlikely to change beyond potentially passing 1.1M units.
Signed,
Day one PS4 console owner that valiantly attempted to get his wife to switch from Xbox to PS4 despite the fact that his first PS4 console was bricked
see that's the difference though. you are saying they need to chill, he is calling them a derivative of retard. which is both offensive to people with retardation and the people he is attacking(which are the people that read his work, and keep the money coming to his site). telling people to chill is fine, but name calling and being offensive is not.
What piece are they going to write after the Xbox One sales?
"Despite bad messaging the Xbox One sells out!"
Who are their masters?
Just trying to get caught up on this thread.
- Ars releases a click-bait article
- GAF calls them out on it.
- Ars lashes out at GAF for calling them out on their bullshit "journalism"
Is that about right?
Whilst I don't condone anyone using insults against the author etc. He's meant to be a professional, and should be held to a higher standard than his readership.Somehow, I don't think the console fanboys that attacked Ars showed that kind of restraint.
If they mention sales at all...
"XBox One sold at a stately pace in both NA and EU. Balance is a game changer."
Nothing wrong with the drm.If we'd chilled when the gaming press told us to, Xbox One pre-orderers would be about to enjoy their DRM infested console on Friday. This attitude of 'The people we write for are morons who need to be told what to do and what to think' really has to stop.
What Ars thinks of their audience.
Somehow, I don't think the console fanboys that attacked Ars showed that kind of restraint.
Nothing wrong with the drm.
I don't see why people are so upset about this article. It is simply pointing out there is a low correlation between initial sales and final sales. It is a valid point. It is the best article? No, but that is hardly a reason to get upset. At this point I wouldn't be surprised if Microsoft was benefiting from an anti-Sony fanboy bias. The Sony defense force is a little ridiculous right now.
And to the people pointing out the difference between 24 hours and the first week, it is completely irrelevant when you sell out of 95%+ of your launch stock in day one. You rarely see replenishment stock until the following week. They are essentially the same thing. I'd be really surprised if Sony made an announcement of week 1 sales because it is unlikely to change beyond potentially passing 1.1M units.
Signed,
Day one PS4 console owner that valiantly attempted to get his wife to switch from Xbox to PS4 despite the fact that his first PS4 console was bricked
Nothing wrong with the drm.
And they are absolutely right.
What does my misspelling have to do with anything? I get paid a lot to write, you mad?
Nothing wrong with the drm.
I agree with this. Usually I agree with the general consensus of GAF but it's too early to tell how well the PS4 will do. I hope it does well or I will be concerned about the future of my hobby.
Self-hating consumers are hilarious
People really should think carefully about pulling the professionalism card every time somebody makes a tweet or facebook post you don't like. It really works both ways, even if you aren't somebody that deals with the public.being professionals, they should be above the crap. journalists and professionals in general, especially in entertainment industries, get that crap all the time. you don't see George Lucas bash his audience when they call the Star Wars prequels crap. no he just keeps himself above it and rakes in the cash.
i would like to know what are you implying here.
Never, ever read Ars for gaming news. Tech and science coverage have gone downhill in recent years, but they're still somewhat worthwhile. Their gaming coverage has always been abysmal.
They don't? Didn't someone just show that both the Wii and the PS2 (market leaders in their respective generations) also had the highest launch day sales?
Any data from previous generations?
People are annoyed (I don't think upset is the right word), because it's a condescending article no matter how you look at it. It's telling its readers, "hey, you know that record-breaking impressive achievement that just happened? I'm going to tell you why it's not actually impressive at all! I'm going to tell you why you're wrong if you think it means anything." Who is it being directed at? The writing history of its author also indicates a pretty heavy bias, which is annoying when it's being posted on a tech site from which you'd hope for some neutrality.
People really should think carefully about pulling the professionalism card every time somebody makes a tweet or facebook post you don't like. It really works both ways, even if you aren't somebody that deals with the public.
Also, none of these people are exactly George Lucas famous. Also, fame is a disgusting concept, anyway.
He is not altogether incorrect, there's not a 1:1 correlation or anything, but without a good start, it's unlikely you are going to be a competitor.
Of course, that they felt the need to run damage control on whether people were "looking into" those PS4 numbers says it all - once again, it's a service against how shitty and dumb they perceive their audience to be, not a service any one actually needs in their readership (unless they're fanboys). It's straight up for their masters.
People who get defensive and make snide generalizing comments to their inner circle of followers on Twitter are such a shameful lot. It's always an embarrassing thing to witness.
Do you punch yourself in the dick?
no they are not as famous as george lucas but they are on twitter accounts being representatives of their employer. and its not about me not liking what they say. its the offensive name calling and attacking of their own readership. it is harmful to their business.
Nothing wrong with the drm.