• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Only 9 of the top 111 highest grossing film directors in 2025 were women...

Director Chloe Zhao has some thoughts...

"Speaking at a Women in Motion talk at the Palm Springs film festival on Monday, Zhao was asked for her response to a recent study that found just nine of the 111 directors behind last year's 100 top grossing films in the US were women.

Zhao is on the list with awards season favourite, Hamnet, a poetic exploration of the grief experienced by William Shakespeare (played by Paul Mescal) and his wife, Agnes Hathaway (Jessie Buckley). The film won Buckley a Critics Choice award last weekend for her raw performance as mother struggling with the death of her son.


"What I've learned from making Hamnet," said Zhao, "is that feminine leadership – and that doesn't mean just women, it means the feminine consciousness in all people – is drawing strength from interdependence, not dominance. So it's drawing strength from intuition, relationships, community and interdependence.

"So it doesn't fit into the current model that we exist in, the container we exist in. It's difficult to come through, and I feel very lucky that I had people in power that trusted that this way of leading is needed for this story."

The annual USC Annenberg Inclusion Initiative surveys the gender, race and ethnicity of directors across the top performing US films. This year's study recorded a considerable year-on-year decline for female directors, with 8.1% of the US's 100 highest-grossing films helmed by women in 2025, compared with 13.4% (15 women) the previous year.



The bolded is a bunch of words that have no meaning at all. But dumb people will read it, nod, and say "yeah that makes sense."
 
Kathryn Bigelow (James Cameron's ex-wife) seems like the exception that proves the rule trend of the subject matter and tone that female directors gravitate towards. She directed Zero Dark Thirty, The Hurt Locker, Near Dark, and K-19: The Widowmaker amongst many other movies.
Add in Gale Anne Hurd and either James Cameron has magic sperm that gets his girlfriends into awesome filmmaking or he just has "the touch" (you got the touch!) for picking cool ass women.

Personally I think he was a fool to leave Bigelow, damn she fine.
 
So even after 10 years of babysitting them and forcing DEI and equal gender representation everywhere, they still can't compete?

Must be sexism.
 
"is that feminine leadership – and that doesn't mean just women, it means the feminine consciousness in all people – is drawing strength from interdependence, not dominance.
1Veqmsb6eWama15o.gif
 
There's no shortage of good women directors. I think most of them tend not to gravitate towards making blockbusters, and that's fine.
 
Last edited:
Men will usually put more effort in such things. You can talk around it as much as you want but we men have an innate desire to impress and compete. Women don't have that. Hence the top end of each spectrum will be male dominated. It's not rocket science.

Yup.

Female group hierarchy is covert and based on relational and not the overt dominance in establishing a visible pecking order we have. They're wired that way in everything they do.

Leadership is based on collaboration, inclusivity and all that shit.

In movie making that means making movies by committee vs a male director's individual vision of HIS movie.
 
I'm not utterly convinced by the explanation this lady gave for why women don't succeed in the field. It sounds more like the mock psychology you see on social media than anything grounded in truth.
 
Probably because the various agenda films most women are making now have bad scripts and dialogue, bad plots, bad acting, bad stories etc as they only care about their over used antagonistic messages and don't care about the overall quality of the film's themselves, definition of madness, doing the same things over and over that doesn't work!.
 
Last edited:
If women wanted to make movies they could do so tomorrow. There's nothing stopping them.

Every woman now has a phone in her pocket that has a camera on it better than anything used to create Metropolis, Citizen Kane or Psycho. They have access to a distribution network in Youtube that is easier to access than Hollywood has ever been.

The fact is they don't really want to make movies. They want to access the status that Hollywood offers. It was the same with comic books and video games. Women had no interest in them until they became big business. Prior to that women tended to mock and ridicule these things and the men that obsessed over them.

This is the reason why all feminism around these issues begins with 'it's not fair...' rather than 'I've got a great idea...' or 'wouldn't it be cool if...'

Men are constantly told that we are bad at expressing our emotions. In reality we express ourselves just fine, it's just that we tend to do it vicariously via sports, engineering and culture. Women do it by sitting around talking. That is why we created the Sistine Chapel and they created Loose Women / The View. It doesn't occur to them to create comic books or movies, they are only interested in these things because men made them successful.
 
Majority of the normal folk who watch movies have no idea who made them.

Rarely are movies seen because of the creative force behind them, ie. James Cameron, Nolan, Spielberg etc.

Maybe, and this is a crazy idea I know, make better movies 🤷
 
Arguably people like Amy Hennig and Roberta Williams and Kim Swift have achieved more in the games industry than any female directors have achieved in the movie industry
 
Director Chloe Zhao has some thoughts...

"Speaking at a Women in Motion talk at the Palm Springs film festival on Monday, Zhao was asked for her response to a recent study that found just nine of the 111 directors behind last year's 100 top grossing films in the US were women.

Zhao is on the list with awards season favourite, Hamnet, a poetic exploration of the grief experienced by William Shakespeare (played by Paul Mescal) and his wife, Agnes Hathaway (Jessie Buckley). The film won Buckley a Critics Choice award last weekend for her raw performance as mother struggling with the death of her son.

"What I've learned from making Hamnet," said Zhao, "is that feminine leadership – and that doesn't mean just women, it means the feminine consciousness in all people – is drawing strength from interdependence, not dominance. So it's drawing strength from intuition, relationships, community and interdependence.

"So it doesn't fit into the current model that we exist in, the container we exist in. It's difficult to come through, and I feel very lucky that I had people in power that trusted that this way of leading is needed for this story."


The annual USC Annenberg Inclusion Initiative surveys the gender, race and ethnicity of directors across the top performing US films. This year's study recorded a considerable year-on-year decline for female directors, with 8.1% of the US's 100 highest-grossing films helmed by women in 2025, compared with 13.4% (15 women) the previous year.


The public mindset has been bombarded with girl power shit for the last 10 or so years. Considered it jaded.
 
I imagine that'll change over time as more women organically rise up from making more stuff people want to see. It just takes time to happen as Hollywood definitely had/has a sexism issue to work though, the process needs to happen by making good products and providing opportunity to those that best deserve it rather than just meeting an arbitrary quota.
 
If you look at the overall breakdown of men vs women directors in Hollywood, then the ratio actually isn't very far off. It would be statistically odd if say the top 100 grossing directors was half men / half female, because that would be a huge outlier.

In other words, seems about right give the overall ratio? 🤔
 
Stop blaming the "patriarchy" when your niche boring crap flops, women can direct big bank movies, just last year we had Kpop Demon Hunters and before that there was Barbie.

Just release things people want.
 
Top Bottom