bitwise said:har har. GTA:SA as best adventure. HAR HAR
They spelled MGS3 wrong.bitwise said:Game of the Year: Halo 2
6.8 said:My favourite title didn't win my favourite award therefore this list sucks.
Littleberu said:GTA SA has more role playing elements than Fable.
Bitching about irrelevant lists.... Wait, nevermind.Littleberu said:That's why a forum is all about. What would it be if we couldn't state our opinions?
6.8 said:Bitching about irrelevant lists.... Wait, nevermind.
Littleberu said:This is a forum about video games, and you should be expecting some arguments about video games.
bitwise said:Most innovative: Splinter Cell: Pandora Tomorrow
Kuroyume said:..Halo 2 isn't good enough to be GOTY....
Littleberu said:GTA SA has more role playing elements than Fable.
Kabuki Waq said:Fable has better Combat / Action than GTA:SA.
bitwise said:Online/Multiplayer: Halo 2
Shooter: Halo 2
Game of the Year: Halo 2
Kabuki Waq said:Fable has better Combat / Action than GTA:SA.
Kabuki Waq said:Fable is by no means better than GTA:SA i just meant that it definately has better combat mechanics than GTA:SA.
I was just trying to couteract Little Beru's obvious troll.
Scoot said:I disagree with you.
But agree with you on Little Beru's obvious troll passed off as "discussion."
chespace said:Dude, it's LITTLE BERU, what the fuck were you guys expecting? :lol
chespace said:Dude, it's LITTLE BERU, what the fuck were you guys expecting? :lol
Scoot said:I'll go one further.
Fable is better than GTA: SA.
Too often Fable is treated like a failure because of PM's big mouth. Rather than being treated for what it in fact IS -- it is treated like what it is not. However, GTA: SA is another expansion pack, this time incorporating RPG elements and a sort of Animal Crossing for the gangsta aspect, but does this carry the game, no of course not. Fable, flawed as it is now, is emblematic of the the future of the RPG -- GTA:SA is just another version of GTA3.
belgurdo said:Quoth myself: San Andreas made Fable irrelevant
Littleberu said:Another awesome version of GTA3. It's not like GTA3 was a poor game to begin with. It's ten time the size of GTA3, the mission are a lot more varried than any other game I played and the customization part is above everything on the market presently ; how is this "another expansion pack"? I would love to buy expansion pack this complete.
Scoot said:Yes, it's bigger. Yes, there's more missions. But the gameplay is fundamentally identical. Wonky targeting, horrendous performance and the customization part of the game, while deep is still pretty simple. I ate more Hamburgers I got fat. I need new clothes, wait for loading screen and wear new clothes, et cetera.
What I do like about GTA:SA is the increasing performance of the player character regarding driving, shooting, et cetera and the improvement of your performance on said tasks as your levels increase. GTA:SA is a fine game, but like I said earlier, it's just an expansion of the two previous incarnations. Making your own clothes and interacting with town people in Animal Crossing is better than pimpin' your ride like Xzibit and smacking hoes on the mean streets of San Andreas.
Littleberu said:Wonky targeting? I thought the targeting system was a lot better than in the previous game, and a lot better than in most games of its genre (see Getaway or True Crime). Yeah, performance wise, it's not that great, but it's still damn impressive from a PS2-hardware point of view.
GhaleonEB said:Better than past versions, impressive for PS2-hardware - that's some serious qualifying.
belgurdo said:Quoth myself: San Andreas made Fable irrelevant
Artanisix said:Best Fighting Game of The Year: DOA Ultimate? WTF!? I find DOA to be a friggin shallow fighting game that features breasts. Best fighting game of the year GGXX#R.
Scoot said:fixed.