• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

$242b Moscow-Beijing high speed rail approved

Status
Not open for further replies.

Polari

Member
A social media post, published by Beijing’s municipal government yesterday, finally confirmed that China are to go ahead with plans to build a multi-billion dollar high-speed rail link between Beijing and Moscow.

The line aims will provide super fast transport across Central Asia and will compete with the Trans-Siberian Railway, cutting travel time between the two countries from six days to two, according to the government’s post on social media website Weibo.

http://www.newsweek.com/242-billion-high-speed-beijing-moscow-rail-link-approved-301302

China still killing it in the high speed rail game #americaplease
 

Amir0x

Banned
Man fug high speed rail, let's invest in Elon Musk and hyperloops plz. 4000mph coast to coast >> high speed rail
 

Burt

Member
Glad someone finally had the bright idea to milk the economic mother lode that is the Mongolia-Kazakhstan corridor.
 

fushi

Member
No doubt it will be built on terms that cripple Russia, much like the recent trade agreements.
 

Ekdrm2d1

Member
A quarter of a trillion dollars!?

To be completed in 2050.

BkZBzWl.gif

Road traveling technology won't change in that time. I can imagine there will be addendums and revisions out the ass.
 

winjet81

Member
A Chinese blog has claimed that the rail link will have multiple long term benefits, including improving the country’s food shortage problems as fertile soil can be easily imported from Russia. The site also said the link would provide an easy way for Chinese farmers to migrate to Russia where they would set up farms to supply food to both countries.

Soil imported from Russia?

Chinese farmers migrating to Russia?

1351116165579.gif
 
Good for them. It'd be cool for countries like Russia and China to make the kind of close ties that Western countries have with each other. You could argue that the original railway networks helped Europe achieve the kind of inter-connectedness it has today.

Glad someone finally had the bright idea to milk the economic mother lode that is the Mongolia-Kazakhstan corridor.
Altay Mountains are beautiful.
 
Soil imported from Russia?

Actually, some Siberian soil is super fertile because no nutrient-intensive plants have grown there for tens of thousands of years. Just smaller plants and animals decaying slowly on top of it. The more northward you travel, however, and it just starts being acidic because nothing has grown there in way too long.

Leave it to the Russians to export all the good stuff, though, and leave nothing for the people who actually need it back home.
 

Burt

Member
They should wait on Musk's HyperLoop, will save you loads and triple speeds.

Ha, that's the last thing they want to do. There's 6000 miles worth of pockets getting greased here, and an equivalent amount of workers getting screwed and corners getting cut. Every dollar spent is another 20 cents in some bigwig's pocket.
 

MJPIA

Member
RT article said it'll be around 7000 kilometers long so around 4349 miles for us americans.
That's roughly 18 billion per mile.
Anyone know the California high speed rail projects estimated cost per mile?
 

johnny956

Member
RT article said it'll be around 7000 kilometers long so around 4349 miles for us americans.
That's roughly 18 billion per mile.
Anyone know the California high speed rail projects estimated cost per mile?

you mean 18 million per mile?
 

Melon Husk

Member
RT article said it'll be around 7000 kilometers long so around 4349 miles for us americans.
That's roughly 18 billion per mile.
Anyone know the California high speed rail projects estimated cost per mile?

you mean 18 million per mile?

Did you all calculate with a potato? You divide the cost by length to get $/mi - in this case $55 million per mile. That's very reasonable actually as far these projects go.
Wikipedia said:
In July 2014 The World Bank reported that the per kilometer cost of California's high-speed rail system was $56 million, less than Phase 1 of High Speed 2 in the United Kingdom ($173 million per km),[5] but more than the average cost of $17–21 million per km of high speed rail in China and $25–39 million per km for similar projects in Europe.[6]
Wikipedia.

More prosperity to the far east can only be a good thing. Go infrastructure projects.
 

jtb

Banned
Love that countries are going this route but hasn't China had a ton of problems with corruption in public works/transportation projects like this one? I could've sworn some high ranking transit official was executed a couple months ago. Or maybe just sent to a gulag. I don't remember.
 

Jasup

Member
I guess it's nice for people afraid of planes. Otherwise i don't see what the point is.

Well, high speed rail competes well with short haul flights. That's what it's great for, and it complements the transportation system by introducing a high capacity alternative for trips that are a bit too long to drive and too short to fly. It's suited for trips that are 150 - 900km long and when introduced it has usually taken the majority of the market share between cities that fall within that (Tokyo-Nagoya, Barcelona-Madrid, Paris-Brussels, Cologne-Frankfurt) practically eliminating air traffic between the cities, easing congestion at airports and freeing more space for long-haul travel.

This approved line however doesn't fit in that scheme however, it's just too long. People won't travel from Moscow to Beijing using the train most probably and it mostly serves communities between the cities like the trans-siberian railway does today. However I suspect we're talking about multi-purpose line, which allows high speed rail travel. Unlike the Japanese and French for example in Germany freight trains are allowed in high-speed lines if they meet certain requirements so we're not talking about long and lumbering freight trains going 80km/h here. And this is the idea here, it will have high speed link, but the main focus is to have a good quality and fast rail freight link.

The idea has been brewing for a while. The idea behind it that it serves a certain niche in the markets between shipping and air freight - cargo that needs to get somewhere faster than with a ship (or to a place a ship can't go) and is too big/expensive to haul by air. We're talking about medium sized and medium priced cargo on a high capacity system. That's what the point is.

Journalists just tend to see the high speed passenger rail part because for the public the point is how fast can they go.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom