DS9 is my least favourite Star Trek it was so dry. I will check out this episode
They had Babylon 5 to compete with too pushing them harder.I think when it first aired a lot of people (including me) felt it was too dry, dark and too serious when compared to the more adventurous Next Generation, but when looked back on now, it‘s very considerable merits are very apparent.
All the shit they try and fail to do in nu-Trek now was being done properly and very well 25 years ago. DS9 has aged so well in storytelling terms.
There was nothing like watching DS9 during its original run…that and WCW Monday Nitro, what a time to be a preteen
if you only watched the first 2 seasons I could imagine that... but 3 onward? no, its the opposite of that. Truthfully it found its footing faster than TNG did.DS9 is my least favourite Star Trek it was so dry. I will check out this episode
They had Babylon 5 to compete with too pushing them harder.
Sorry if this rant is just some griping about DS9 in general but, while I agree that DS9 certainly had complex serious storyline and maybe writing-wise DS9 > TNG, but oh my god, I think character/cast-wise TNG >>>> DS9.
Looking back I think that was my main reason for not being able to get into DS9. I just couldn't connect with any of the characters. They are all so attractive, perfect and flawless, but also so bland and uninteresting, and can almost be interchangeable.
There were no amazing multi-faceted, flawed characters like Data, Geordi, Lt. Barclay, or Worf. In fact they even had to bring Worf over to DS9 to save the show.
I guess Quark and Gul-Dukat were pretty cool, but they weren't enough to make DS9 worth watching for me.
That's why these days I'd rather look up the history of DS9 on Memory Alpha than have to sit through the episodes.
Wtf am I reading? TNG all characters seem the exact same by the end, even data as he didnt even get his emotions until the movies.Sorry if this rant is just some griping about DS9 in general but, while I agree that DS9 certainly had complex serious storyline and maybe writing-wise DS9 > TNG, but oh my god, I think character/cast-wise TNG >>>> DS9.
Looking back I think that was my main reason for not being able to get into DS9. I just couldn't connect with any of the characters. They are all so attractive, perfect and flawless, but also so bland and uninteresting, and can almost be interchangeable.
There were no amazing multi-faceted, flawed characters like Data, Geordi, Lt. Barclay, or Worf. In fact they even had to bring Worf over to DS9 to save the show.
I guess Quark and Gul-Dukat were pretty cool, but they weren't enough to make DS9 worth watching for me.
That's why these days I'd rather look up the history of DS9 on Memory Alpha than have to sit through the episodes.
Sorry if this rant is just some griping about DS9 in general but, while I agree that DS9 certainly had complex serious storyline and maybe writing-wise DS9 > TNG, but oh my god, I think character/cast-wise TNG >>>> DS9.
Looking back I think that was my main reason for not being able to get into DS9. I just couldn't connect with any of the characters. They are all so attractive, perfect and flawless, but also so bland and uninteresting, and can almost be interchangeable.
There were no amazing multi-faceted, flawed characters like Data, Geordi, Lt. Barclay, or Worf. In fact they even had to bring Worf over to DS9 to save the show.
I guess Quark and Gul-Dukat were pretty cool, but they weren't enough to make DS9 worth watching for me.
That's why these days I'd rather look up the history of DS9 on Memory Alpha than have to sit through the episodes.
Um, what?They are all so attractive, perfect and flawless, but also so bland and uninteresting, and can almost be interchangeable.
Production wise yes, story wise I don't feel it does even after all this time. B5 just has a special place in TV history for what it did (to me at least).DS9 holds up better than B5 I think. But you’re right. They had up their game because of what B5 was doing.
I just rewatched B5 and it loses all steam once Earth is dealt with. Meaning the final season is a bore.Production wise yes, story wise I don't feel it does even after all this time. B5 just has a special place in TV history for what it did (to me at least).
Wtf am I reading? TNG all characters seem the exact same by the end, even data as he didnt even get his emotions until the movies.
Ds9 literally every character changed.
Op on point probably the best ds9 episode
Sorry if this rant is just some griping about DS9 in general but, while I agree that DS9 certainly had complex serious storyline and maybe writing-wise DS9 > TNG, but oh my god, I think character/cast-wise TNG >>>> DS9.
Looking back I think that was my main reason for not being able to get into DS9. I just couldn't connect with any of the characters. They are all so attractive, perfect and flawless, but also so bland and uninteresting, and can almost be interchangeable.
There were no amazing multi-faceted, flawed characters like Data, Geordi, Lt. Barclay, or Worf. In fact they even had to bring Worf over to DS9 to save the show.
I guess Quark and Gul-Dukat were pretty cool, but they weren't enough to make DS9 worth watching for me.
That's why these days I'd rather look up the history of DS9 on Memory Alpha than have to sit through the episodes.
I guess they were flawed, but not in a way I could relate to. I dunno what it was exactly but I just didn't care for any of the characters, except maybe Gul Dukat.When Sisko grew his goatee, the stories got better but even in the first episode... ALL the characters were deeply flawed! What the HELL were you watching?! Because it definitely wasn't DS9!
I think you summed it up pretty well. So they were all pretty much nasty, unlikeable people.Kira was a terrorist, Quark a conman, Garak a spy, Dukat a war criminal, Bashir narcissistic, Sisko cold-blooded and vengeful...
All the characters had a lot of depth.
Not at all. They were complex characters with faults, which made them interesting. This was a direct reaction to TNG's idealized cast, which portrayed a vision of the future largely free of human shortcomings dragging it down.I think you summed it up pretty well. So they were all pretty much nasty, unlikeable people.
Yeah, it was a shame the way the studio handled it, leaving it unsure if there would be a 5th season so the makers crammed season 4 full of events, leaving the cup bare for season 5 when it got greenlit.I just rewatched B5 and it loses all steam once Earth is dealt with. Meaning the final season is a bore.
Doesn't that include season 6? That's where the federation actually actively started fighting back.I have never seen the Dominion war season because my local syndication station at the time stopped carrying DS9. I should watch the final season of DS9.
I don't know I haven't seen it.Doesn't that include season 6? That's where the federation actually actively started fighting back.
You should, it still has some of the best armada vs armada fights in TV history IMOI don't know I haven't seen it.
Um, what?
Sisko was a huge departure from Kirk and Picard, willing to get down and dirty. One might argue that Kirk was also a rule breaker, but mostly in a “I don’t do speed limits” kind of way. Sisko on the other hand, was willing to do serious longterm damage. There’s of course, the bit that this thread is dedicated to. He also detonated photon torpedoes on two Maqui planets, irradiating them and making them uninhabitable for five decades… motivated by mostly his own personal grudge with Eddington over a betrayal. That’s top tier petty and I question what other Federation protagonist or DS9 character you could possibly exchange him with.
Kira is an unrepentant former Maqui terrorist. I mean, her past is littered with a large Cardassian body count, and she doesn’t budge an inch on how she feels her actions were 100% justified, man, woman, or child, as she viewed all present on Bajor as valid targets. She’s interchangeable with whom, exactly?
I mean, even Jake Sisko got more development than say, Deanna Troi or Beverly Crusher. Jake showcasing a very realistic reaction to war, choosing to run at the sign of immediate, direct danger and later trying to come to terms with his own cowardice was a really great arc for the character. The Visitor was an incredible episode showcasing just how important his father was to him.
DS9 had far better character writing than TNG. And it’s fine really, they’re two very different shows doing very different things. I love TNG and all, but your take on DS9 is just absurd and disconnected with the given lineup of episodes that are (Christ) over two decades old.
I live here in Las Vegas so I just kind of love the whole aesthetic of Vic Fontaine.Vic Fontaine was low key my favourite DS9 character. An absurd character in conception, a holographic agony uncle for the crew of a station that didn’t have a counsellor who just happened to be a lounge singer from the 60s.
But as opposed to being a one and done character he became quite impactful to the crew, to the point that they helped him with his own problems when the time came (even if it was largely a daft episode).
DS9 was a great show, even if it was something that I think Roddenberry would have hated. It blurred the lines between his idea of a utopian future and how reality can actually be, something this particular episode demonstrated.