trmas said:Good old MS, selling yet another lie. Gotta love 'em.
You have to be a joke character...
trmas said:Good old MS, selling yet another lie. Gotta love 'em.
trmas said:Nope. I don't know why you are surprised about this. MS never wanted or expected to have to deal with BC. They half-assed it like they did the rest of the launch, and expect ignorant consumers (like Speevey) to lap it up.
Haklong said:Asshat, you said people that owned one had to trade it in for a 360. That is a large godamn number and you are wrong. You need a clue. I also know people personally that didn't have to sell their system to get a 360. Just because you had to doesn't mean everyone else had to. If you think I'm the only one that has both system sin their home then you are retarded. You come to this damn forum each day. You hear how the BC is for the system yet you still trade in your XBOX and keep the games HOPING MS makes them all BC? If you did that then you are more retarded than I initially thought.
Angelus said:Good point,you saved me the trouble of typing it out.
I pretty much saw what might happen when they were pussyfooting around about "the best seelling games being compatatable for the 360 machine." :lol
I mean honestly all anyone had to do was use some common sense here. If folks had doubts that there wouldn't be problems with original XBox games playing ok on a 360 then don't act at all surprised that this is now happening. It'll probably all be sorted out as we go along 2006 but for now you can see its business as usual in this forum-tons of over assumptions running rampant now.![]()
And this forum probaly owns more anime than should be legal,I doubt folks are having storage problems then. An Xbox doesn't take up that much space.
Speevy said:The Xbox 360-owning world can never fully appreciate how well you understand them.
Speevy said:That's one of the main reasons I spent $400 on the console.
demi said:When did you spend $400?
Speevy said:That's one of the main reasons I spent $400 on the console.
Honestly? Black.Borys said:I mean - what would you like to play more: Black or Halo 3?
Borys said:Even though I despise him, Speevy is right this time:
BC was never promised or touted as a major selling point of 360. It is just an obscure feature that may be or may be not used by 1% of 360 buyers. Every sane person will value playing new, "next-gen" (har, har) games over old crap he has beaten countless times, even in "upgraded" (har, har) graphics.
As for the haters saying "buh, buh, buh PS2 did it!" - so what?
SNES didn't, N64 didn't, neither did GameCube nor Dreamcast - you don't have a point to base your attacks on.
I <3 Katamari said:Here's the question, and someone else mentioned it:
Why the hell are they on "holiday" for a month and a half from this?
Excelion said:they delivered the most complex piece of software ever written in emulation history, owning thousands of GAFFers when the BC list was revealedthey deserve it.
monkeymagic said:1. Pretty much the only people who have been owned (as evidenced in this thread) are faithful XBox customers who continued purchasing XBox games and lining MS' pockets after being promised working BC.
monkeymagic said:2. No point writing software no matter how complex it is if it doesn't work - but then that's the Microsoft way - bloat, complexity and never working.
monkeymagic said:3. Unlike 99% of other emulation projects out there they had the backing of a $300B company and access to all the specs of the hardware they were emulating and still did a piss poor job.
Nevertheless M$ promised full backwards compatibility at E3 after Sony and Nintendo had done so. They could've just kept quiet but instead decided to lie.Borys said:BC was never promised or touted as a major selling point of 360.
cybamerc said:Nevertheless M$ promised full backwards compatibility at E3
westical said:What backwards arse logic is that? How have I been owned by buying Xbox games while waiting for the 360 to come out?
westical said:Unlike 99% of other emulation projects, they were emulating a system only released four years ago.
Speevy said:Yeah, MS really conned me. Man, I was looking forward to that backward compaitibility. That's one of the main reasons I spent $400 on the console. You sure do know what you're talking about, trmas.
godofcookery said:Linky
"from what it sounds like..." part seems a bit suspect. if true, very bad. I like BC.
anyway, opinones?
monkeymagic said:I guess you like throwing away $50 games but I don't think those who bought XBox games believing they would work on X360 are as rich/frivolous/forgiving as you.
monkeymagic said:
westical said:Unlike 99% of other emulation projects, they were emulating a system only released four years ago.
Borys said:Even though I despise him, Speevy is right this time:
BC was never promised or touted as a major selling point of 360. It is just an obscure feature that may be or may be not used by 1% of 360 buyers. Every sane person will value playing new, "next-gen" (har, har) games over old crap he has beaten countless times, even in "upgraded" (har, har) graphics.
BudokaiMR2 said:Really don't see how this applies at all. Unlike most emulation project this is sponsered by the biggest software giant in the industry, who also employs some of the best coders in the world.
Sorry, as far I am concerned M$ just half-assed it on purpose.
westical said:Two games that fully work. Bust-A-Move and Namco Museum.
westical said:Find me an Xbox owner who has bought games in the last six months and genuinely thought that they would work on the 360.
Borys said:The saddest point is that there is no middle ground here on GAF, there's noone level-headed here. You either are posting as a:
Blind Fanboi:
- best launch ever!
- best hardware ever!
- LMAO who needs HD-DVD media? DVD-9 is enough!
- SC >>> MGS
- Live! Arcade >>> whole PSWho library
- who needs BC when there's PD0, Kameo and other 11/10 titles?
- Live! is only $50 a year and I'd pay even $500 a year because it's that good!
- Halo > PC gaming
- etc.
or a:
Rabid Hater:
- LMAO at the "next-gen" graphics
- Xbox could do that
- Live! is a rip-off, PC online is free
- M$
- you bought 360 to play some shitty 2D, 8MB arcade games? that are free on PC?
- 2 failures: HD-DVD addon and HDD
- online is a fad, 2M people played online on Xbox; PS2 has 100M users
- what a shitty BC service - Barbie Horse Adventure and Ninja Gaiden in 2 fps
- 360 is a poor man's PC with PC ports
- etc.
Every fucking thread is like that. BC, HD-DVD, Splinter Cell, Rare. People who can't see a damn flaw in their system and in MS and people who see *only* flaws. Usually you don't even have to open a thread to know what's inside.
westical said:Yes, I'm sure it's a big elaborate ploy by "M$" to piss off part of their userbase who want to play Xbox games on their 360.
Panajev2001a said:For me Backward-compatibility on any console MEANS added value, it is an important thing.
westical said:Yes, I'm sure it's a big elaborate ploy by "M$" to piss off part of their userbase who want to play Xbox games on their 360.
westical said:I wasn't replying to you.
BudokaiMR2 said:The joke is on M$. This is one of the few reasons that I am not buying a 360 yet. I never owned an XBOX and it would be nice to if I could just get a 360 and play some of the games I missed. IMO BC isn't something that should be half-done. You either have full BC, or you axe it completely.
Panajev2001a said:I was only commenting your post. I was agreeing with you.
Panajev2001a said:You forgot the third type:
Almighty, High-horse riding poster who generalizes everything and subdivides all of his fellow board members in either one of two negative categories.
Borys said:Even though I despise him, Speevy is right this time:
BC was never promised or touted as a major selling point of 360. It is just an obscure feature that may be or may be not used by 1% of 360 buyers. Every sane person will value playing new, "next-gen" (har, har) games over old crap he has beaten countless times, even in "upgraded" (har, har) graphics.
As for the haters saying "buh, buh, buh PS2 did it!" - so what?
SNES didn't, N64 didn't, neither did GameCube nor Dreamcast - you don't have a point to base your attacks on.
As for the whole BC fiasco - MS should just release Halo 3 and shut all the yapping mouths out there.
I mean - what would you like to play more: Black or Halo 3?
Think before posting people, it doesn't hurt. Neither does keeping your old Xbox in a closet.
Borys said:The saddest point is that there is no middle ground here on GAF, there's noone level-headed here. You either are posting as a:
Blind Fanboi:
- best launch ever!
- best hardware ever!
- LMAO who needs HD-DVD media? DVD-9 is enough!
- SC >>> MGS
- Live! Arcade >>> whole PSWho library
- who needs BC when there's PD0, Kameo and other 11/10 titles?
- Live! is only $50 a year and I'd pay even $500 a year because it's that good!
- Halo > PC gaming
- etc.
or a:
Rabid Hater:
- LMAO at the "next-gen" graphics
- Xbox could do that
- Live! is a rip-off, PC online is free
- M$
- you bought 360 to play some shitty 2D, 8MB arcade games? that are free on PC?
- 2 failures: HD-DVD addon and HDD
- online is a fad, 2M people played online on Xbox; PS2 has 100M users
- what a shitty BC service - Barbie Horse Adventure and Ninja Gaiden in 2 fps
- 360 is a poor man's PC with PC ports
- etc.
Every fucking thread is like that. BC, HD-DVD, Splinter Cell, Rare. People who can't see a damn flaw in their system and in MS and people who see *only* flaws. Usually you don't even have to open a thread to know what's inside.