• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

4D Object Challenge

Status
Not open for further replies.
I have to construct a 3D model of a 4D Octahedron. I'm having a lot of trouble finding any pictures to use as reference. Could anyone point me to a site which has such things?

Or better yet, could someone explain how to go about constructing one.
 

tenchir

Member
BobbyRobby said:
I have to construct a 3D model of a 4D Octahedron. I'm having a lot of trouble finding any pictures to use as reference. Could anyone point me to a site which has such things?

Or better yet, could someone explain how to go about constructing one.

4D?? So it's length, width, depth, and......... time?

I used google and clicked on the first link.

http://astronomy.swin.edu.au/~pbourke/polyhedra/platonic4d/

Here's what I found:

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cross Polytope
Also known as 16 cell or hexadecachoron

Dual with hypercube

4D equivalent of the octahedron

16 tetrahedral cells, 32 triangular faces, 24 edges, 8 vertices

4 tetrahedra meet at an edge

The generation sequence is: Point - Line - Square - Octahedron - Crosspolytope
------------------------------------------------------------------------------


16cellslices.gif

16cellsolid.gif

16cellpov.jpg


Just use google, I found a lots of pics and info on 4d octahedron.
 
tenchir said:
4D?? So it's length, width, depth, and......... time?
Not necessarily time. One can imagine a theoretical fourth spatial dimension that we're just not well equipped to deal with. I'm not sure if there's a standard convention about what to call a fourth to go along with "length" and the rest, though.

Looks like you and Google have done a nice job of providing help, tenchir. I've read up a bit on this stuff, but not enough to help a great deal. I remember the basic idea of creating a 3D model of a 4D shape is analagous to how we often see 3D shapes turned into 2D versions of themselves for display on our limited monitors. And as is the case with a 3D shape being viewed on a 2D screen, what that lower-dimensional representation will look like can differ a lot depending on the viewing angles.
 
I usually just refer to any extra dimensions not easily described as physical aspects (ie: time, density, some sort of tempreture gradient, etc) as sub-dimensions. They're actually kindof fun to play around with in math.
 

Scrow

Still Tagged Accordingly
morbidaza said:
I usually just refer to any extra dimensions not easily described as physical aspects (ie: time, density, some sort of tempreture gradient, etc) as sub-dimensions. They're actually kindof fun to play around with in math.
whoa, slow down there. you can't use the words "fun" and "math" in the same sentence.
 

slayn

needs to show more effort.
Scrow said:
whoa, slow down there. you can't use the words "fun" and "math" in the same sentence.

what about:

integral(e^x)=f(u^n)

if you write it out, this mathemtical formula spells out sex=fun
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom