I only skimmed a video (without audio too lol), but it seems the prices are well above MSRP and the performance over the 4070TI is pathetic.Can someone summarize? Is it more money for similar performance?
Can someone summarize? Is it more money for similar performance?
Except you can't get an RTX 4080 super at the price of an RTX 4080 because econ 101.(Demand is so outstripping supply right now.)It's slower than the 2.5 year old RTX 4080 for the price of an RTX 4080![]()
BTW I found it interesting Jayztwocents doesn't remember a card release with such screwed up availability as this shit show. Guess he doesn't remember the AMD 6000 series release since that was so long ago, IE late 2020. (Let's hope they don't screw up this release but why do I think they're up for the challenge?)
BTW I found it interesting Jayztwocents doesn't remember a card release with such screwed up availability as this shit show. Guess he doesn't remember the AMD 6000 series release since that was so long ago, IE late 2020. (Let's hope they don't screw up this release but why do I think they're up for the challenge?)
It would be alright, not even good. That’s still slower than the 2 years old 4080.Bottom line: if it really was 750 it would be good (not great, but good).
4070ti super 66RT cores, 5070ti - 70.What surprises me is how ray tracing hasn’t improved at all.
Because buying a $2500 GPU isn’t getting fucked in the ass?So basically get a 5090 or get fuck in the ass?
What surprises me is how ray tracing hasn’t improved at all.
The dick is biggerBecause buying a $2500 GPU isn’t getting fucked in the ass?
this is around a RTX 4080 level which is ~1.7 the performance of a 3080.....What a joke.
I was expecting this to double the performance of my 3080 + unlock the cripling 10gb of vram... it only does the vram part.
It's barely any faster otherwise and it's way more expensive. Would be too expensive even at msrp
1.7?this is around a RTX 4080 level which is ~1.7 the performance of a 3080.....
So "barely faster" is
![]()
your numbers are factually false as xy benchmark comparisons show....1.7?
It's maxing at around 45-50% faster compared to my 3080 10gb version and that is in 4k limited vram scenarios.
Otherwise it's around 30% faster.
yes. I call that BARELY FASTER over 2 generations of graphics cards at the same price... or in fact for a thosuand $ compared to 700$ I paid for 3080
What do you mean? gtfo with your 1.7 outlier lol.uh get it, that`s a rofif definition thing, just like Forspoken is a "great" game.
no one is arguing that this is shit value for the money, but your usual completely arbitrary definitions are just.....I would get this for 500$. Just to have more vram. But not 1k
what definitions?no one is arguing that this is shit value for the money, but your usual completely arbitrary definitions are just.....
I'm glad I bought 4070ti Super ~100$ below MSRP in October and didn't wait for this, damn...
I was offered a kfa2 geforce rtx 4090 sg 1-click oc for 1500€…. Shall I buy it?
it hurts to say it, but it`s probably not the worst value for the money in this shithow of a situation. I´d not buy a card without any warranty though.I was offered a kfa2 geforce rtx 4090 sg 1-click oc for 1500€…. Shall I buy it?
Still expensive for a video card. I got my 4090 for around £1500 brand new. It comes down to how much income you have. Also depends on your CPU and your monitor.I was offered a kfa2 geforce rtx 4090 sg 1-click oc for 1500€…. Shall I buy it?
Oh I don't doubt that. Sorry about not being clear about that. It's just the idea that he doesn't remember how bad the AMD 6000 series was for availability. (It was only 4 years ago and that was another paper launch.)Trust me, this is peak covid levels of fucked up availability.
Aww man, I remember umming and ahhing, proper soul searching for ages I was, over whether to chance getting a 4070 ti Super, so late as it was into the 4000 gen.
Never felt so vindicated.