This is one meaty article, tin foil hat of industrial scale needed.
https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2017/may/07/the-great-british-brexit-robbery-hijacked-democracy
https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2017/may/07/the-great-british-brexit-robbery-hijacked-democracy
In June 2013, a young American postgraduate called Sophie was passing through London when she called up the boss of a firm where shed previously interned. The company, SCL Elections, went on to be bought by Robert Mercer, a secretive hedge fund billionaire, renamed Cambridge Analytica, and achieved a certain notoriety as the data analytics firm that played a role in both Trump and Brexit campaigns. But all of this was still to come. London in 2013 was still basking in the afterglow of the Olympics. Britain had not yet Brexited. The world had not yet turned.
That was before we became this dark, dystopian data company that gave the world Trump, a former Cambridge Analytica employee who Ill call Paul tells me. It was back when we were still just a psychological warfare firm.
Was that really what you called it, I ask him. Psychological warfare? Totally. Thats what it is. Psyops. Psychological operations the same methods the military use to effect mass sentiment change. Its what they mean by winning hearts and minds. We were just doing it to win elections in the kind of developing countries that dont have many rules.
On that day in June 2013, Sophie met up with SCLs chief executive, Alexander Nix, and gave him the germ of an idea. She said, You really need to get into data. She really drummed it home to Alexander. And she suggested he meet this firm that belonged to someone she knew about through her father.
Whos her father?
Eric Schmidt.
Eric Schmidt the chairman of Google?
Yes. And she suggested Alexander should meet this company called Palantir.
I had been speaking to former employees of Cambridge Analytica for months and heard dozens of hair-raising stories, but it was still a gobsmacking moment. To anyone concerned about surveillance, Palantir is practically now a trigger word. The data-mining firm has contracts with governments all over the world including GCHQ and the NSA. Its owned by Peter Thiel, the billionaire co-founder of eBay and PayPal, who became Silicon Valleys first vocal supporter of Trump.
In some ways, Eric Schmidts daughter showing up to make an introduction to Palantir is just another weird detail in the weirdest story I have ever researched.
Tamsin Shaw, an associate professor of philosophy at New York University, helps me understand the context. She has researched the US militarys funding and use of psychological research for use in torture. The capacity for this science to be used to manipulate emotions is very well established. This is military-funded technology that has been harnessed by a global plutocracy and is being used to sway elections in ways that people cant even see, dont even realise is happening to them, she says. Its about exploiting existing phenomenon like nationalism and then using it to manipulate people at the margins. To have so much data in the hands of a bunch of international plutocrats to do with it what they will is absolutely chilling.
We are in an information war and billionaires are buying up these companies, which are then employed to go to work in the heart of government. Thats a very worrying situation.
The Electoral Commission has written to AggregateIQ. A source close to the investigation said that AggregateIQ responded by saying it had signed a non-disclosure agreement. And since it was outside British jurisdiction, that was the end of it. Vote Leave refers to this as the Electoral Commission giving it a clean bill of health.
On his blog, Dominic Cummings has written thousands of words about the referendum campaign. What is missing is any details about his data scientists. He hired physicists is all hell say. In the books on Brexit, other members of the team talk about Doms astrophysicists, who he kept a tightly guarded secret. They built models, using data scraped off Facebook.
And to finally answer the question about how Vote Leave found this obscure Canadian company on the other side of the planet, he wrote: Someone found AIQ [AggregateIQ] on the internet and interviewed them on the phone then told me lets go with these guys. They were clearly more competent than any others wed spoken to in London.
The most unfortunate aspect of this for Dominic Cummings is that this isnt credible. Its the work of moments to put a date filter on Google search and discover that in late 2015 or early 2016, there are no Google hits for Aggregate IQ. There is no press coverage. No random mentions. It doesnt even throw up its website. I have caught Dominic Cummings in what appears to be an alternative fact.