Andvary said:development time? budget? hardware knowledge ? style?
It happens in every console, what is your point?
Striek said:The poster screwed up by trying to say that Segas games graphics (screen ) is more what we should expect.
No, just no.
guess he missed the memo.jett said:That's not GT5, it's "Vision GT":it's GT4 running in high res, showing some features that will make it into the next-gen Gran Turismo. Motorstorm, on the otherhand, is a real game. There's your pretty goddamned obvious explanation.
SpokkX said:Motorstorm was clearly CG
xabre said:Look, however you all want to spin it, there is a discrepency in the shots released so far and IMO this discrepency is so obvious that you could mistake the games for entirely different systems. This leads me to the conclusion that the less spectacular looking games, such as eyedentify and fifth phantom saga look like total arse compared with the likes of killzone or motor storm so much so that the later two couldn't possibly be running on the same hardware.
SolidSnakex said:Sorta like this?
![]()
![]()
SolidSnakex said:Sorta like this?
![]()
![]()
xabre said:Pointless 1st gen vs 5th gen comparison.
CabbageRed said:I think the moral of this thread is that crashing buggy screenshots excite gamers and frighten fanboys.![]()
SolidSnakex said:It's not pointless. What you have is a developer that knows what they're doing vs. one that doesn't.
But here's 2 launch games for ya
![]()
![]()
xabre said:Of course you conveniently fail to mention that one is a PS1 game and the other is a PS2 game. Try again.
xabre said:Of course you conveniently fail to mention that one is a PS1 game and the other is a PS2 game. Try again.
xabre said:I think the moral is that no mater how hard one tries to point out the bleedin' obvious, people stick steadfast to what they hope in spite of what the reality actually is, i.e. gullibility.
I know PS3 is an impressive piece of kit because killing day was real-time and it was very impressive; however motor storm and killzone were sure as hell not realtime, but I suppose if your happy to live in fictitious land where pre-rendered movies are accepted as real-time graphics then so be it.
Twix said:what kind of topics is this ? I am sorry xbox fanboys but the PS3 is really impressive, there is no reason to dubiety and no reason to make all this stupid theories.
PS3 > Xbox 360... PEACE.
xabre said:Pointless 1st gen vs 5th gen comparison.
xabre said:I don't know what you posted but it sure looks like one; full of pixellation.
xabre said:Have a look at the Tekken 6 shot form the link I posted above, do you think that is a real-time grab? Compare it to the characters from Eyedentify...the image quality of the Tekken shot clearly shows it to be CG. Why is it so hard for you to consider the prospect that at least some of the demos shown were concepts of what they believe the end product will look like? Why is this so inconceivable? This is not a knock on PS3, just an observation.
xabre said:I don't know what you posted but it sure looks like one; full of pixellation.
Have a look at the Tekken 6 shot form the link I posted above, do you think that is a real-time grab? Compare it to the characters from Eyedentify...the image quality of the Tekken shot clearly shows it to be CG. Why is it so hard for you to consider the prospect that at least some of the demos shown were concepts of what they believe the end product will look like? Why is this so inconceivable? This is not a knock on PS3, just an observation.
xabre said:I don't know what you posted
:lolduckroll said:THERE! He admits it like a man. He has NO IDEA what he's talking about. :lol
xabre said:Yeah laugh it up, we'll see who'll be doing the laughing when these games are made available and look nothing like the CG we saw earlier :lol
Ryudo said:I demand an apology. I dont know what for, but you sony fans need to be pegged back a notch.