At least you're not pushing the Moto X anymore.Z3?
Z3
Z3 might not be out for them though if they're in the US.
At least you're not pushing the Moto X anymore.Z3?
Z3
soonT mobile doesn't have the Z3.
At least you're not pushing the Moto X anymore.
Z3 might not be out for them though if they're in the US.
man i need a phone yesterday.soon
Umm, someone already linked the video earlier in the thread. Though the video is so good everyone should see it again! I guess I'll let slideSpeaking about the Xperia Z3 here is an underwater unboxing video of the the Z3 by Carphone.
ok soooo g3 vs note 3 vs note 4 vs s5 vs m8?
i need to buy a phone tomorrow.
god there's so many. im going with t mobile.
man i need a phone yesterday.
so apart from the z3 the g3 is the best phone on the market?
I see a lot of hate for the new Moto X.
What's the reasoning? The camera? The battery?
I get the complaints about screwing with the 'ideal' form factor of the original X. But for me as long as it:
1) Lasts me the full day only needing to charge when I go to bed so (7:30-12 usually)
2) Takes considerably better pictures than my Nexus 4
I think I'll be very satisfied. Not to mention the price is great.
If the Z3 Compact was out and on AT&T this wouldn't even be an issue, but my N4's battery is basically shot and I need a new phone soon.
Umm, someone already linked the video earlier in the thread. Though the video is so good everyone should see it again! I guess I'll let slide
The 2014 Moto X satisfies both your conditions easily. Based on reviews its battery life is comparable to Moto X 2013, iPhone 5s and the camera is better than the 2013 Moto X which was leaps and bounds better than a Nexus 4 camera. (I have owned Nexus 4, Nexus 5, and 2013 Moto X)
The reason why people on this forum love to hate on it because they now expect phones to last 1.5 - 2 days and they expect every camera to be iphone level.
Oh and they also require sd cards which 99 percent of the US population does not give a shit about except for the small tech population like the people on this forum.
The 2014 Moto X satisfies both your conditions easily. Based on reviews its battery life is comparable to Moto X 2013, iPhone 5s and the camera is better than the 2013 Moto X which was leaps and bounds better than a Nexus 4 camera. (I have owned Nexus 4, Nexus 5, and 2013 Moto X)
The reason why people on this forum love to hate on it because they now expect phones to last 1.5 - 2 days and they expect every camera to be iphone level. Oh and they also require sd cards which 95 percent of the poulation does not give a shit about.
No the reason people on this forum love to hate on it is because a few proselytize over the phone.
And those same people are not trying to do that with the Z3?
What a great crowd. People ask for $500-650 purchase advice and they never recommend a Moto because they hate the fans on this forum.
What a nice crowd
Nah, it is a natural reflex to people over hyping something.
And the battery sucks.
No, the battery is average and gets you through a full day if its comparable to the 2013 Moto like the reviews say. A sucky battery would die at 5-6 PM.
This kind of crap is the problem
No the reason people on this forum love to hate on it is because a few proselytize over the phone.
No the reason a few proselytize over the phone is because people on this forum love to hate it.
It might get you through a day, but it won't get everybody through every day.
My Oneplus One gets 5-6 hours screen time over 14-15 hours and still isn't enough for travel days.
Battery life is top two of important features for me, and for many others. Moto X doesn't stack up to other options, thus it isn't an option for me.
Oh man, you just blew my mind.
Yeah that's a load of crap. I do it because I think its a great American company and phone so I want them to do well.
What I don't do is hate on others phones consistently like others do with the Moto. OK I lied, I will hate on touchwiz.
Why.Speaking about the Xperia Z3 here is an underwater unboxing video of the the Z3 by Carphone.
Software matters when it comes to camera quality.Why are sony cameras in sony phones never as good as sony cameras in apple phones?
Sony!?
Why are sony cameras in sony phones never as good as sony cameras in apple phones?
Sony!?
Yup, its amazing. I love my moto g 4g, especially for how little I paid for it. Makes it a lot harder for me to convince myself that high end £300-£550 phones are worth it, although that's the only way to get a good camera.I have been playing with my moto g all day and I cannot say how impressed I am with the phone. The only hiccup I noticed was when I was running like 12 things including a gps and then went to the home screen. While its not the fastest phone that I have used. It certainly is a smooth and impressive experience. Super pleased so far. Call quality is nice but its a tad low. Also speakers are similar in loudness to my original beats audio htc one m7.
I think I will be buying a turquoise backing for the phone over the royal blue.
Why are sony cameras in sony phones never as good as sony cameras in apple phones?
Sony!?
http://www.dxomark.com/Mobiles/Appl...et-gold-standard-for-smartphone-image-qualityIs there a good camera comparison between the i6 and the z3?
Internet speed is good but I was thinking it would be better. I think I might not be able to get the prime lte-a connections where I live. Anyway with unlimited data on 4g it's pretty damn fun. My old phone was a 3 year old 3g pantech so I'm pretty happy.
Why are sony cameras in sony phones never as good as sony cameras in apple phones?
Sony!?
Dxomark is the leading camera sensor testing site out there. They're the anandtech of camera sensors.That site doesn't have the 1020 at or near the top. I question it's credibility.
Why are sony cameras in sony phones never as good as sony cameras in apple phones?
Sony!?
Then that coverage map doesn't seem right.
Here's LTE coverage from their site:
Here's what opensignal.com says for ATT LTE coverage:
And I'm pretty sure every one I've met who has Cricket says their coverage is terrible around here. But that's just around here (a major metro area), it could be different elsewhere...
More HTC Eye Info:
- It's a 13MP duo camera setup (so no more ultrapixels?)
- Launch Android 4.4.4/Sense 6
- Unsure about screen (could be 5 or 5.2 inch)
It seems like if you want an M8, this seems like the version to get
http://www.gsmarena.com/htc_m8_eye_with_13mp_duo_camera_set_to_land_in_october-news-9770.php
It's got the same problem I have with the Sony phones.
If both are just being announced for NA in early October that probably means they will launch what late October? Maybe Early Nov?
Do you really want to pay a premium for a 801 handset this late in the 801 life cycle?
Sure it's the phone people should get over the current M8, but like I said it's just a bad spot IMO to be buying older 801 hardware that isn't on the cheaper low. You can get the current M8 for under $500 or $50 on contract.
805 devices are starting to hit outside of the far east so it's hard to recommend an 801 device. Plus we are gettiing a lot of low end and mid range 64 bit devices coming as well. I'm not even sure if the 615 chip could even really be called mid range too which is in the HTC Desire 820 and seems to be really fast.
Don't forget the 800 is essentially an overlocked 800 with some battery improvments too.
Of course, but people who are really set on the M8 but are disappointed at the camera may mean this is the phone for them. I would too suggest the current M8 since it's cheaper, but some people really prioritise the camera aspect.