• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Atari broke - defaults on a 50$ million loan

argon

Member
http://www.thestreet.com/_googlen/tech/gamesandgadgets/10263817.html?cm_ven=GOOGLEN&cm_cat=FREE&cm_ite=NA

In a regulatory document filed on Tuesday, the video-game software publisher warned that results for the period ended Dec. 31 of last year didn't meet the strictures placed on the company by its lender, HSBC.

On the positive side, the fact that Atari has breached the agreement may have little immediate effect. According to the regulatory filing, Atari had essentially borrowed only a "nominal amount" of money from the credit line from HSBC.

But the negative could outweigh the positive. This marks the second time in three quarters the company's results have failed to meet the financial targets set by HSBC, even though HSBC reduced those targets after the previous time Atari fell short of them.

With Atari's cash reserves having dwindled to just $2.5 million at the end of September, access to the credit line from HSBC has previously been -- and could again prove to be -- crucial to the company's ability to continue as a going concern.


Company representatives did not return calls seeking comment.

Although HSBC notified Atari that it was in default of the lending agreement -- a $50 million line of credit -- Atari didn't say what actions the bank by take in response.

In its latest incarnation as a subsidiary of the France-based Infogrames, Atari has been struggling for years. In just the last year, the company's CEO left after just seven months on the job, it shut down or sold off three software development studios and saw sales and bottom-line results fall off dramatically.

Is a buyout in Atari's future? Will they drag Infogrames down with them?
Microsoft would probably love to get its hands on that Atari IP and brand image for XBLA.
 
WTF is up with Atari, how many times have they gone broke now throughout history? And I thought they were doing well after the success of Enter the Matrix.
 
Am I wrong or does Atari = Infogrames? So this is just Infogrames going down, not a big surprise. As everyone here I'm sure knows, the Atari of the 80s is long, long, gone. Infogrames just bought the name Atari and changed their name for more recogizability in the US.
 
I really hope Mark Ecko's Getting Up sells a lot of copies! It would be a shame if this potentially awesome franchise about selling clothes were to end too soon.

OOPS I MEAN THE OPPOSITE OF THAT
 
ghostmind said:
They should stop releasing games that suck then...


I'm sure Driv4r will save them...

Driver: Parralelelelel Lines is much, much, much better than Driv3r. And the proposed soundtrack that I heard is pretty amazing. But I don't think it's going to sell 1.25 million out the gate....
 
argon said:
Atari is a subsidiary of Infogrames..
No, Atari is just the US branch of Infogrames after they bought the name and game rights. It's still just Infogrames.
 
I thought Infogrames officially announced a company wide name change a few years back. I can't remember the last time I heard "Infogrames".
 
On May 7 2003, Infogrames, Inc. officially rebrands its global operations as Atari. All titles published under the Company are now under the Atari brand name. The Company's U.S. operations become Atari, Inc. (formerly Infogrames, Inc.) and its trading symbol on the NASDAQ becomes "ATAR." Although majority shareholder IESA retains its current name and symbol on the Euronext under the code: 5257, all of the Company's worldwide operations are renamed Atari.

http://corporate.infogrames.com/history.html
 
publishers should look at ubisoft for an example of success.. where they were a couple of years ago, and where they are now...
 
Meh, the Atari brand isn't going anywhere anytime soon, nor will it ever again represent what it once stood for...whatever that may be.
 
thorns said:
publishers should look at ubisoft for an example of success.. where they were a couple of years ago, and where they are now...


QFT... I used to think they sucked ass.. .now they are one of the best 3rd party developers in the industry.
 
Where's a new North and South? :P

Mashing said:
QFT... I used to think they sucked ass.. .now they are one of the best 3rd party developers in the industry.

UBi have gone downhill. All their new franchises are critic darlings but utter rubbish to play.
 
thorns said:
publishers should look at ubisoft for an example of success.. where they were a couple of years ago, and where they are now...
I hope they don't. Ubisoft hasn't had an original idea since 2003. Publishers like Ubisoft are why the North American gaming industry is leveling off. Can't bring in new consumers or keep the old ones excited if you do the same things over and over.
 
SKOPE said:
I hope they don't. Ubisoft hasn't had an original idea since 2003. Publishers like Ubisoft are why the North American gaming industry is leveling off. Can't bring in new consumers or keep the old ones excited if you do the same things over and over.

blah blah... do away with they have no original idea bullshit.

far cry instincs
splinter cell: chaos theory
prince of persia
king kong
beyond good and evil
lock on
il 2-sturmovik/forgotten battles
brothers in arms
ghost recon

These are all highly rated..

They've shown that quality is important for success, no?

I have no doubt they will continue to be a quality developer/publisher. They have gone from being a nobody to being one of the bigger players. I guess you could say the same about Take Two, but I wouldn't say they 're as successful, they have failed to make good use of their enourmous success with GTA.
 
xir said:
Driver: Parralelelelel Lines is much, much, much better than Driv3r.
In the manner that being stabbed in the buttocks is much, much, much better than taking a shotgun blast to the chest? I'll believe it when I see it.
 
This is like what, the 3rd NA publisher hitting hard times? First Midway(should've stayed making arcade games), Majesco, now Atari? It would be interesting to see where these companies end up 5 years from now.
 
argon said:
Is a buyout in Atari's future? Will they drag Infogrames down with them?
Microsoft would probably love to get its hands on that Atari IP and brand image for XBLA.
And why the hell would somebody buy a sinking ship? The company isn't even mildly successful, they pose not threat to other publishers and they simply don't have any interesting IPs.
 
All these East Coast companies have a history of iffy management: Atari, Majesco, Acclaim, Take2, etc., etc.

Must be something in the water....
 
GitarooMan said:
Am I wrong or does Atari = Infogrames? So this is just Infogrames going down, not a big surprise. As everyone here I'm sure knows, the Atari of the 80s is long, long, gone. Infogrames just bought the name Atari and changed their name for more recogizability in the US.

This is how I understand things. Atari of yesteryear is not the Atari of today at all. It's just a name.
 
Zaptruder said:
Will the Atari name die for good? I remember infogrames were doing really quite well a few years back.

I'm sure someone could buy it. But the name doesn't mean shit to most people except for us old folk.

And us old folk know that it's not even the same Atari Nolan Bushnell started.
 
Next-gen = doom of Take Two and Atari?

(then pretty much anyone else?)

If there really a crisis going on next-gen, the Rev may really influence something if it is indeed cheap as Nintendo is telling.
Damn, next-gen is going to be a very interesting one!
 
Wyzdom said:
Next-gen = doom of Take Two and Atari?

(then pretty much anyone else?)

If there really a crisis going on next-gen, the Rev may really influence something if it is indeed cheap as Nintendo is telling.
Damn, next-gen is going to be a very interesting one!

I'm sure the big wigs will survive next gen no problem.
 
Dr_Cogent said:
I'm sure someone could buy it. But the name doesn't mean shit to most people except for us old folk.

And us old folk know that it's not even the same Atari Nolan Bushnell started.

I know someone else could buy it. I meant, would some one else buy it? Whatever for? the name is shit.
 
Zaptruder said:
I know someone else could buy it. I meant, would some one else buy it? Whatever for? the name is shit.

I know I wouldn't buy it if I was in a position to. Anyone with 1/2 a brain shouldn't buy it.
 
Dr_Cogent said:
I'm sure the big wigs will survive next gen no problem.

Yeah. EA, Activion and Ubi will prolly survive of course. I mean, things would start to get really interesting if all the mid-size and small publishers are going all crazy on handhelds and Rev. Seriously, that's what i would do if i was them.
 
argon said:
http://www.thestreet.com/_googlen/tech/gamesandgadgets/10263817.html?cm_ven=GOOGLEN&cm_cat=FREE&cm_ite=NA



Is a buyout in Atari's future? Will they drag Infogrames down with them?
Microsoft would probably love to get its hands on that Atari IP and brand image for XBLA.



It would be nice to see a company with alot of money and lasting power adopt the Atari name (but not the company behind the name). I think it would be good to have an Atari Xbox brand but that is just me.
 
typo said:
They didn't get broke on the X360/PS3. They got broke on the current gen.

The current gen is killing publishers, folks.
Publishers kill themselves. Which ever generation it occurs is irrelevant.
 
Atari held a formidable position in the world video game market. They were the number one console maker in every market except Japan, whose market belonged to Nintendo, which had released their first game console, the Famicom (known to the rest of the world as the NES) in 1983. The system took Japan by storm, and Nintendo began to look to other markets. They approached Atari and offered a licensing deal: Atari would build and sell the system, paying Nintendo a royalty. The deal was in the works, and the two companies tentatively decided to sign the agreement at the 1983 Summer CES. Unfortunately, at that same show Coleco was showing their new Adam computer, and the display unit was running Nintendo's Donkey Kong. But Atari owned the rights to publish Donkey Kong for computers. Atari CEO Ray Kassar had a fit, accusing Nintendo of double dealing with the Donkey Kong license. Nintendo in turn tore into Coleco, who only had the console rights to the game. In the coming month, Ray Kassar was forced to leave Atari, and executives involved in the Famicom deal were forced to start over again from scratch.

As you can see, atari has always taken bad decisions, i just hope they die and never come back.
 
Top Bottom