Behold, the Big Three™

LakeOf9

Member
image.png


This is it. The core gaming industry has rallied around three platforms, each with more than 100 million active users, each selling billions of games, each giving third parties large, receptive audiences to sell to. There are differences in all of them of course - other than the exclusives unique to each platform, they each specialize in different things; Steam and PC gaming is open, flexible, and all about giving users and developers options. PlayStation is the go to, premier, default console option. If you want to play games but don't want to muck with PCs, PlayStation is the way to go. Nintendo is the go to, premier, default portable and family-friendly option, prioritizing local multiplayer, user friendliness, and toy style hardware gimmicks.

With Xbox on the way out, and Steam starting to proliferate the platform beyond just PCs thanks to Steam Deck, SteamOS, and rumoured upcoming Steam OEM consoles, as well as Switch 2 anticipated to set sales records, and absorb a lot of third party support Nintendo didn't get before, plus PlayStation's ongoing dominance, means these three platforms are it. The big three for the industry.
 
There's way more to PC than just Steam.
Yes there is, but Steam the platform is what I am talking about in the OP (for good or for bad)

Steam needs more competition. I hope other companies start creating PC gaming storefronts, Apple perhaps.
Steam really has not needed competition so far to act in its user base's best interest

Also Apple already has a storefront on Mac.
 
I think I have more games on GOG than Steam

Edit: I feel like the OP does a bit of a disservice as to how good Nintendo games are and feeds into the narrative that they just make little kids games. All games are for kids. Don't delude yourself into thinking you're more of an adult because you're playing on a PlayStation or PC.

Gaming is a kids hobby.
 
Last edited:
but Steam the platform
Sorry to bother but could you please define platform for me?

Because imo the platform is the place where you play, the PC. Steam is just a storefront and distributor, just like GOG. I dunno, it would be like calling PSN a platform, when the plaform imo would be whatever Sony console you are accessing PSN from.

Still too many.

We need a big two.
Nah fuck that, the more the merrier. The more competition, the better things are for the consumer.
 
Sorry to bother but could you please define platform for me?

Because imo the platform is the place where you play, the PC. Steam is just a storefront and distributor, just like GOG. I dunno, it would be like calling PSN a platform, when the plaform imo would be whatever Sony console you are accessing PSN from.
I think platform and hardware used to be interchangeable, but the rise of digital ecosystems has changed the equation. A platform hosts your games, your play history, friends, achievements and activity, a centralized storefront for game purchases, standardization for input and abstraction, servers for online play, tools provided to developers to facilitate game development and distribution, curation, promotion, and distribution. Steam, I think, is a platform, and it is a platform that is most divorced from being attached to hardware. You can get it on PCs running Windows, Mac, Linux, plus Steam's own in-house and OEM devices. But it is a platform, IMO.
 
hosts your games, your play history, friends, achievements and activity, a centralized storefront for game purchases, standardization for input and abstraction, servers for online play, tools provided to developers to facilitate game development and distribution, curation, promotion, and distribution
Ok, you've convinced me! Never though of it this way.
 
Steam needs more competition. I hope other companies start creating PC gaming storefronts, Apple perhaps.
Yeah sure. The company that has been making computers for like 40 years and has never cared one bit about games even working on their computers are gonna be the ones to compete with steam.
 
I still don't see Nintendo as a competitor to Steam or Playstation. If Switch didn't exist, most of those customers would not have bought a PS5 or Steam Deck. Would probably just go without dedicated gaming hardware. Maybe an iPad gets bought or something. Switch doesn't replace Steam Deck whatsoever and vice versa.
 
Last edited:
image.png


This is it. The core gaming industry has rallied around three platforms, each with more than 100 million active users, each selling billions of games, each giving third parties large, receptive audiences to sell to. There are differences in all of them of course - other than the exclusives unique to each platform, they each specialize in different things; Steam and PC gaming is open, flexible, and all about giving users and developers options. PlayStation is the go to, premier, default console option. If you want to play games but don't want to muck with PCs, PlayStation is the way to go. Nintendo is the go to, premier, default portable and family-friendly option, prioritizing local multiplayer, user friendliness, and toy style hardware gimmicks.

With Xbox on the way out, and Steam starting to proliferate the platform beyond just PCs thanks to Steam Deck, SteamOS, and rumoured upcoming Steam OEM consoles, as well as Switch 2 anticipated to set sales records, and absorb a lot of third party support Nintendo didn't get before, plus PlayStation's ongoing dominance, means these three platforms are it. The big three for the industry.
Xbox isn't dead until they announce plans to discontinue their console business.

There's way more to PC than just Steam.
Lol look at this guy
 
I still don't see Nintendo as a competitor to Steam or Playstation. If Switch didn't exist, most of those customers would not have bought a PS5 or Steam Deck. Would probably just go without dedicated gaming hardware. Maybe an iPad gets bought or something. Switch doesn't replace Steam Deck whatsoever and vice versa.
Honestly, Steam's a road apple in the console space.
 
Top Bottom