• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Bloomberg: Tencent, Guillemot Family Are Considering Creating a New Venture that Include Certain Ubisoft Assets

Lunatic_Gamer

Gold Member


Key Quotes:

"Tencent Holdings Ltd. and Ubisoft Entertainment SA's founding Guillemot family are considering creating a new venture that would include certain Ubisoft assets as they seek to boost the French video-game company's value, people familiar with the situation said.

The Chinese technology firm and the Guillemot family are evaluating which assets to include in a new entity and their valuation, the people said, asking not to be identified because the deliberations are private. A potential deal would allow Tencent to own a stake in the venture and gain more control over some of Ubisoft's intellectual properties, while boosting its video game business outside of China, the people said.

Deliberations are ongoing and no final decisions have been made, the people said. A representative for Tencent declined to comment. A spokesperson for Ubisoft referred to the company's Jan. 9 announcement, when it said it had appointed advisors to review and pursue various options to boost value, declining to comment until that process has been completed.

Bloomberg News reported in October that Tencent and the Guillemot family were speaking with advisers on ways to stabilize Ubisoft and bolster its value after its share price plunged. A buyout was one of the options under consideration, people familiar with the matter have said."


everything emperor GIF
 
Last edited:

Laptop1991

Member
They will have to change the formula they have been using recently to make games or they won't sell and their reputation isn't good now, infact it's really bad and gamer's have long memories.
 

Kurotri

Member
So what does this mean? A new company where certain IPs will be offloaded to that Tencent has more control over? And if that company does well they..somehow boost Ubi's stock or something? Just by association? I'm confused.
 
If they reduce the asset could sony or nintendo swoop in and buy multiple studios and ips? As I hear selling of assets and studios? I would love if tencent didn't have it due to the point that tencent is gonna own all studios and publishers as this rate
 
Last edited:

Thief1987

Member
So what does this mean? A new company where certain IPs will be offloaded to that Tencent has more control over? And if that company does well they..somehow boost Ubi's stock or something? Just by association? I'm confused.
They want to offload part of Ubisoft's property to some subsidiary joint company which Guillemots and Tencent would own. Basically they want to become private.
 

mdkirby

Gold Member
My understanding is Ubisoft is unionised. They are also based in eu countries with strong employee protection laws.

If as both the ceo says is true (ie that 50% of their 20,000 staff are juniors who haven’t made a game before), and recent reports of the staggering amount of deadweight, then they can’t just “sack them” easily.

This could be a get out hatch, make a new company with tencent, transfer the core IP, then shut down Ubisoft, so the jobs no longer exist. Offer jobs at the new company to the high performing talent.
 

Gonzito

Gold Member
I dont understand why Sony or Microsoft don't offer that buy them or something. Maybe they could actually start making good games again
 

lh032

I cry about Xbox and hate PlayStation.
I dont understand why Sony or Microsoft don't offer that buy them or something. Maybe they could actually start making good games again
good games is not enough. Companies wants profit.

Ubisoft has more than 20k employees i believe? that is a huge operating cost
 

Thief1987

Member
I dont understand why Sony or Microsoft don't offer that buy them or something. Maybe they could actually start making good games again
I doubt that there are many willing to buy a deadweight of 20k employees. And also it seems like Guillemots desperately don't want to sell, more to it they most likely want to become Ubisoft's private owners and this ruse with Tencent is part of this movement.
 
The Guillemot family are seemingly impervious to the effects of free market economics.

How do they still have this much sway. They should be bought out and therefore ousted from anything to do with the company ever again.
 

MayauMiao

Member
I dunno, man. Making a deal with Tencent is like making a deal with the Russian mafia, imho. They will fuck you over at some point.

How so? Ubisoft already fucked gamers, how would making a deal with Tencent be any worse?
 

Hudo

Gold Member
How so? Ubisoft already fucked gamers, how would making a deal with Tencent be any worse?
I know it's popular to hate on Ubisoft and I don't deny that they're, like every other big company, shitty to their customers. But I believe that Tencent getting ownership of Ubisoft's IPs is even worse.

Edit: Ubisoft still have some occasional releases that are pretty good. And they've got some stuff in the pipeline that has the potential to be good, like Anno 117, the new Rayman game or Heroes of Might & Magic: The Olden Era. I fully believe that Tencent either wouldn't make these "smaller" games or try to monetize them even more aggressively.
 
Last edited:
I dont understand why Sony or Microsoft don't offer that buy them or something. Maybe they could actually start making good games again
Merger and acquisitions is more than just forking up a sum of cash and "owning" a company. They'd inherit their entire organizational infrastructure and their miscellaneous challenges.
 
Tencent can have em.

Probably improve tenfold anyways. What’s the last good thing to come out of France anyways? 😏
 
Last edited:

hinch7

Member
Ubisoft as a brand are tainted now so this is probably the best way they can get out. Tencent were rumored to be circling around Ubi even before all of this went down.
 

Cyberpunkd

Member
This could be a get out hatch, make a new company with tencent, transfer the core IP, then shut down Ubisoft, so the jobs no longer exist.
Agencylife Bingo GIF by MX Player


Even if they are in their right at least in France the moment they announce it the State will order a fiscal control, and everything else for that matter.
 

mdkirby

Gold Member
Agencylife Bingo GIF by MX Player


Even if they are in their right at least in France the moment they announce it the State will order a fiscal control, and everything else for that matter.
Yah it’s very different to the U.S. where it would be comparatively trivial to purge huge amounts of staff, then immediately start hiring back up.
 

R6Rider

Gold Member
I'd rather them make a huge downsize, and sell off most of their IPs.

Basically anything Tom Clancy is better in someone else's hands at this point.
 

Mibu no ookami

Demoted Member® Pro™
Imagine these shareholders allowing this family to sink the company and then raid the assets for pennies on the dollar.

The shareholders should call for an emergency meeting to fire the entire board and to fire the CEO.

Bringing in a new board and a new CEO, if it is determined that the best course of action is to sell off assets, then those assets should be sold to the highest bidder rather than to the Guillemot family who sunk the value of the assets in the first place.

I could see EA being interested in some of those assets and perhaps Microsoft too.

The problem is how toxic those assets are now. Ghost of Yotei could completely kill off Assassin's Creed this year. Splinter Cell is long gone.

Rainbow Six is probably the only asset with long term and current value.

Ubi Soft is basically the most generic company in gaming today.
 

Felessan

Member
I fully believe that Tencent either wouldn't make these "smaller" games or try to monetize them even more aggressively.
You, as many others, have a great misconception about Tencent and their modus operandi
Both last year stars Wukong and Stellar Blade backed by Tencent without "wouldn't make or monetize aggressively"
 

MikeM

Member
This guy need to let go. Stop trying to control something that is clearly failing. Sell it and let your family ball out on the money.
 

poodaddy

Member
I'd rather them make a huge downsize, and sell off most of their IPs.

Basically anything Tom Clancy is better in someone else's hands at this point.
This. I don't want these cucks fuckin up a potential Splinter Cell return to form one day. Sell the IP to someone who cares.
 

yurinka

Member
hearing about the misadventures of these Guillemot
It’s always about money, profit maximisation, shareholder revenue, bonuses, asset value, business expansion.
This is what CEO & board of directors do in all companies, it's their job.

Tencent were rumored to be circling around Ubi even before all of this went down.
Tencent gave money to the Guillemots to help them (+ their stockholders partners/allies, which include a big chunk of Ubi employees) have full control of the company, and signed that in a certain amount of years (don't remember if 5 or 8 years, and don't remember how long ago it was) they wouldn't buy more Ubisoft stock and wouldn't sell the one they have.

That would be compatible with making an Ubisoft+Tencent spinoff -which could keep private, safe from hostile takeovers and stock market value engineering from hostile actors- to move part of Ubisoft there, which would give money to Ubisoft for the transaction and would reduce its costs since now part of then would be on that spinoff. While at the same time, they would continue controlling it.
 
Last edited:

NickFire

Member
I can't help but wonder if this would allow a new company to control the best assets while leaving Ubisoft in hospice after the owners cash out.
 

Kurotri

Member
Tencent gave money to the Guillemots to help them (+ their stockholders partners/allies, which include a big chunk of Ubi employees) have full control of the company, and signed that in a certain amount of years (don't remember if 5 or 8 years, and don't remember how long ago it was) they wouldn't buy more Ubisoft stock and wouldn't sell the one they have.

That would be compatible with making an Ubisoft+Tencent spinoff -which could keep private, safe from hostile takeovers and stock market value engineering from hostile actors- to move part of Ubisoft there, which would give money to Ubisoft for the transaction and would reduce its costs since now part of then would be on that spinoff. While at the same time, they would continue controlling it.
Man, the corporate world is so fucking insane. To someone who isn't as in the know when it comes to these things it reads like some insane story twist. How is that even possible :messenger_tears_of_joy:
 

yurinka

Member
Man, the corporate world is so fucking insane. To someone who isn't as in the know when it comes to these things it reads like some insane story twist. How is that even possible :messenger_tears_of_joy:
Yes, it's pretty insane.

And well, in big corporations even if they talk in a politically correct way, PR friendly way, specially publicly to don't affect the stock value with some weird quote, there are fierce fights for power both inside and outside the corporations. Stabbing coworkers or supposed partners, or partnering with supposed enemies, depending on their interests on each topic.

I left big companies and moved to small indie games partly because wanted to skip these politics/fights for power and focus instead just in making games and teaching about it.
 
Crazy. I wonder how many people would lose their jobs if they were to do this. I imagine AC and Rainbow is all they would really care about taking with them.
 
Top Bottom