I'm assuming 5'4" for #2. It's the average height in the US for women.The range in 2-3-4 all have their advantages.
But I need to know height. I'd probably take #2 as the best but moreso if she's close to 5', anything in the range around 5'2" is optimal female height.
I choose 2, 3, 4, 6. If I had nothing else to eat, I would settle for 1 and 5, but there is very little meat there.
5 ,1, 3, 2, 4, 6![]()
3>2>1>4>5>6
I'd put 1 over 5 but I've seen a version of this pic with the same images just spaced a bit farther apart where 5 looks petite instead of a waif.5 ,1, 3, 2, 4, 6
I guess Worf was being pulled in by the gravitational pull!!!From Star Trek... Don't know the actress's name or anything but I saw this and thought immediately of this thread.
![]()
Boy daniel larusso went from elizabeth hurley and a hot asian to sniffing crusty jockstraps uh...
lool MajorGrin is having some fun with the thumbnail.. she's a cute asian bridge member with nice enough butt but it's being enhanced quite a bit for this thumbnail editFrom Star Trek... Don't know the actress's name or anything but I saw this and thought immediately of this thread.
![]()
Either 1 or 2, wouldn't pass on a 5, the perception on the 6 translate to hip hop culture![]()
I'm assuming 5'4" for #2. It's the average height in the US for women.
![]()
I'm assuming 5'4" for #2. It's the average height in the US for women.
vera dijkmansWho is she?
vera dijkmans
The dark side of the moon
The closer the camera is, the bigger the booty looks. I know several models this applies to.